Get help now

Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution

dovnload

Download

  • Pages 2
  • Words 451
  • Views 551
  • Can’t find relevant credible information

    Let our experts help you

    Get help now

    To a remarkable degree Anti-Federalist had many different views and motivations to reject the ratification of the Constitution. The both parties Federalist (also known as Nationalist) had different views on the constitution, Anti-Federalist opposed the Constitution. They felt the articles should only be amended, it also felt that the constitution gave more power to the central government and less to the states, and for having such a negative sounding label the Anti-Federalist didn’t get as much support as the Federalist.

    Before the constitution we have today, there was something known as the Articles of Confederation, which was essentially an early version of the Constitution. When the Articles of Confederation were written, a group of American leaders thought that the newly-written articles didn’t give the main federal government enough power and that too much power was being given to individuals and the state. They called themselves the federalists. To oppose them a new group formed called the Anti-Federalist.

    They felt that the articles should be changed, because the Original Articles wanted to give the central federal government a lot more power over the states, which caused the anti-Federalist to opposed. Anti-Federalist felt that the Constitution gave more power to central government and less to the states. Anti-federalist saw the constitution as a sinister plot by an Elite leader; “to lord it over to the rest of their fellow citizens, to trample the poorer part of the people under their feet that they may be rendered their servants as slaves. They also argued that the constitution would become to tyrannical because the central government wouldn’t be able to run all states as a result of being too distant and removed from interest of common citizens and farmers. The Anti-Federalist didn’t ever top off a counter campaign effective as the Federalists’ pamphlets, speeches, and newspaper editorials. Federalist had a base support of commercial farmers, merchants, shippers, artisans, and finally holders of national debt.

    Anti-Federalist did get some supporters of wealth and social standing. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts and George Mason of Virginia; they were both delegates that refuse to sign the constitution, because they feared that new national government would swallow up the state government. In the other hand most Anti-Federalist were backcountry farmers who live far from centers of communication and market outlets for their produce.

    They also distrusted social and commerce elite. So in conclusion these are some reasons why the Anti-Federalist failed but attempted to oppose the ratification of the Constitution; They felt the articles should only be amended, it also felt that the constitution gave more power to the central government and less to the states, the Anti-Federalist didn’t get as much support as the Federalist.

    Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution. (2017, Feb 16). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/analyze-the-reason-for-the-anti-federalist-opposition-to-ratifying-the-constitution/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper