My research will help to educate people on animal rights and to hopefully to ensure the ethical treatment of animals in the entertainment industry. By gathering information from college students I will how the students education to animals rights as well be able to provide some insight to their views to animal rights. Using the data collected will be able to show viewpoints on animal rights, which animals are considered to have rights and what types of rights people feel are needed to protect animals.
Entertainment Industry Concerns about animal suffering are not new or modern ideas. The question of animal rights is discussed in relation to man’s evolutionary history as a predator and exploiter of other species. It is suggested that, providing man attempts to eliminate suffering from the animals with which he is dealing here is no reason why he should not exploit them. However, decisions on the degree to which, and the manner in which, we exploit animals are ethical decisions that should be made by society in general, but only when it has a knowledge of the facts.
Animal rights is a subject that has been around since the publication of “Animal Liberation” in 1 975 by philosopher Peter Singer. In his book, Peter Singer States that the basic principle Of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires equal consideration. The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) being founded in 1 980 allowed this, which has helped bring attention to the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry.
PETA believes supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth?a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. Animal rights are not just a philosophy?they are a social movement that challenges society traditional IEEE that all nonhuman animals exist solely for human use. (PET A, n. D. ) Literature Review While my research is regarding what people believe animal rights to be and their feelings as to the treatment of animals in the entertainment industry.
I was unable to find any research to go along with my topic but getting an understanding of animal rights will help to create a focus on my research topic. Regarding animal rights, it appears that we have to first define them into law in order to be able to start protecting animals. Corroded Attainment (2013) examines animal law; his research provides information on what is fined as animal law. This Article considers a critically important issue facing the new field of animal law: how to define animal law itself. There currently is no definition of animal law that is accepted generally by lawyers in the United States.
The Article demonstrates that advocacy-oriented definitions violate fundamental standards of definition and conflict with crucial aims and values of our legal system. The discussion argues in favor of descriptive definition of animal law, but explains why such a definition may be difficult to formulate. The Article maintains that a necessary first step in finding a satisfactory benefiting?and in motivating lavaВ»years, law school faculty, and law students to pay sufficient attention to animal-related legal issues?is rejection of advocacy-oriented definitions of animal law.
Claire Rasmussen (2012) discusses the animal rights in a little more detail in regards to the biasness of the animal rights laws. She discusses the deficiencies in the laws that do exist and points out that the laws will never cover all aspects of animal interactions with the human population. Her research is important because when new laws are formed they can try to better protect all animals versus the few that re protected. While law does not define animal rights, it is a something that the world has put a large focus on for years.
Lyle Munroe (2012) introduces us to the Animal Rights movement, which he describes as one of the most neglected and misunderstood movements of our era. He explains the history of the movement and then explores the reasoning why it’s becoming more important to our society and social movement scholars. His research will help to understand the reasoning for the movement and stand to educate people on the importance of the movement. The animal rights movement is important in understanding what animal rights are and why there is a focus on it being added to law.
The movement as helped to make strides towards changing the governments of the world’s view on the treatment of animals. The animal rights movement is attributed to the book “Animal Liberation” by Peter Singer in 1 975; most of the awareness comes from the efforts of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Mutatisј and Forrester (2013) analyze Petal’s strategies for making social noise, a form of public communication that is sufficiently attention grabbing to be ‘heard’.
A common social noise tactic is shock advertising. It has a magic-bullet effect; when PETA resorts to graphic video recordings of animal abuse, it instills feelings of ‘shock’ to get its point across. Unlike many other studies on PETA and its advertising strategies, this analysis is distinctive in that it mostly bases the principle of shock advertising on the theory of social noise. The latter adds fresh insights to our understanding of visual legitimacy in the twenty-first century.
While knowing that animals are important to the planet as well as society as a whole is great, knowing why this is important will help to make changes in laws to protect animals. Exploring the credibility of the law is important to be able to prove why the changes are needed. Mattocks & Sorenson (2013) address an area that has not been given serious consideration in social welfare and social work literature, the instrumental use of nonhuman animals, in particular as food, and argues that the welfare of humans and other animals are intertwined.
The paper also examines the consequences of animal exploitation for humans in terms of health, well- being environmental damage, and exploitation of vulnerable human groups. In order for laws to be able to be set to protect the rights of animals, determining what is wrong or right is important to be able to make sure every animal is awarded the same rights. In order to create laws that will equally protect and ensure the proper treatment of animals you have to explore current conditions in which humans subject animals to for research.
Foreordains (201 1) discusses both human research and animal research operates within established standards and procedures. Although the human research environment has been criticized for its sometimes inefficient and imperfect process, reported abuses of human subjects in research served as he impetus for the establishment of the Emerging Code, Declaration of Helsinki, and the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and the resulting Belmont Report. No similar, comprehensive and principled effort has addressed the use of animals in research.
Although published policies regarding animal research provide relevant regulatory guidance, these policies have not emerged from the process of specifying consistent and reasoned ethical principles. The lack of a fundamental effort to explore the ethical issues and principles regarding he use Of animals in research has led to unclear and disparate policies. Recent studies have increased our understanding of animal cognition and emotion, suggesting that animals’ potential for experiencing a wide variety of harms, such as pain and fear, is greater than has been previously appreciated.
Furthermore, relationships between methods of captivity and certain laboratory procedures and the resulting adverse physical, social and psychological effects have been established. In light of this information, current protections may need to be reconsidered and modified. The paper explores the historical convergence and divergence in the creation of human and animal research guidelines, as well as opportunities to align ethical frameworks with new scientific discoveries.
By examining the current conditions of animals being used in the entertainment industry we can learn ways to better protect the animals by ensuring they are properly cared for by their owners. Duffy & Moore (201 1) examines challenges associated with global regulation of the tourism industry via an analysis of the use of elephants for trekking and safaris in Thailand and Botswana. It highlights inherent problems in applying universal principles in diverse locations; it unpicks the North-South power dynamics involved in drawing up global standards for elephant welfare in tourism.
While it focuses on elephants it can also help in exploring the exploitation Of other animals throughout the world by giving insight into the problems. Methodology This paper utilizes interview data collected from current college students from all parts of the United States. I used a combination of in person interviews, Keep interviews and a survey that I administered to student via social networking sites. The personal and video interviews I administered to people who I knew that were attending school. The survey I then loaded on Faceable and Twitter and directed to any college student that was now enrolled and attending classes.
Eligibility Criteria To be eligible for participation in the study the people must attend college student currently enrolled and attending classes in the United States. The questions from the interviews were the same as the questions used in the online survey. Enrollment Process I selected from my group of friends and family the participants that interviewed via face-to-face and Keep. Elected based on the criteria that they were in college and selected them based on the schools they attended. Was able to get participants from Florida, Indiana, Ohio, North Carolina and California to give me answers to the questions.
I created the survey on Survey Monkey and used the same questions that I used for the interviews. I then uploaded the survey to Faceable and Twitter. When loaded ask qualify candidates to please complete the survey to help me with my research project. I listed the eligibility criteria so that could decrease the amount of data that was irrelevant to my study. If the participants took the survey via Faceable or Twitter, review the results to remove anyone that wasn’t a college student. Study Participants The interviews I administered to participants in sit down face-to-face interview or via Keep. Hose 5 of my friends as participants each was chose because they were current college students in a U. S. Campus. For the interviews asked 5 questions to the participants on their opinion on treatment of animals and their rights. I also then took those same 5 questions and created a survey on survey monkey and blasted it out to my friends via Faceable and Twitter. I only asked my friends that were in college to complete the survey. Data Analysis The sample data collected in my research wasn’t enough for me to be to claim that the American college student’s population shares the Same views.
I had hoped that by creating the survey and blasting it out on social networks I would be able to reach more college students but in the time frame in which I had to complete the project I didn’t receive enough responses. I did however receive some great data from both my interview process and the surveys about how the participants view animal rights. Mostly the sample believe that there is a need for animal rights law definition. However I did notice that hen asked to define some of those rights the participant found it hard to decide what those were and whether they should pertain to all animals.
From this information find a direct correlation to the issue of animal rights and American lawmakers. Both my survey and the information I find about animal rights lead to the same issues about what the laws should define and whom they should cover. Conclusions Based on my research I was able to find that people do believe that animals deserve protection by written laws and have rights created to protect them. While it’s a consensus that animals need protection, the matter of equality moms into question when people’s opinions asked to write the laws.
What types of animals need protection, what types of protections and the extensiveness of the penalty for breaking the laws all keep animals from having right granted to them. Like the freedoms that were given to the American people after years of struggle, animals lack the ability to stand up for them and require us to do so for them. Animal rights will only be accomplished if we as the human race change our ways of thinking about what is equal to us on this planet. Once we are able to accept that we need animals, then we will be able to grant protection Of law o them. Placation for future research I believe there is a lot of research on animal rights exploration to do. If given more time believe that I could collect more results to support my research question. In determining the knowledge of animal rights, researchers and lawmakers could work together to carry out laws that will protect all species of animals equally. Laws haven’t been written due to the indifference on which animals to protect and how to protect them, but by using the research that exist and all future research we will be able to come to an agreed conclusion. References Attainment,J. (2013). What Is Animal Law?.