We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Assignment 07.06 writing an argument Essay

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Define “standard of care. ” How would appropriate “standard of care” be determined in this case? In the healthcare industry “standard of care” is defined as the attention given to a job (with a patient) that would realistically be expected to be given by anyone in an alike situation (Caldwell, Carla, and Connors, 2012). In this case study there are several things that a healthcare provider can do to insure that the “standard of care” is properly put into action.

One would be to liver high-quality care, even though the patient is incoherent they still deserve high-quality care, not to mention the fact that if we were patients we would want the same high-quality care.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment 07.06 writing an argument
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

2. What is the difference between informed and implied consent? Was the consent in this case implied, informed, or neither? Explain your response. Implied consent is the permitting of authorization for health care without a formal agreement between the patient and health care provider (Farley, 2014).

Informed consent is required before most invasive actions are preformed (Farley, 2014).

In this case study neither implied nor informed consent applies due to the fact that the patient was incoherent when she arrived at the hospital. Therefore if the patient was not conscious then there could not have been any consent of any kind given. 3. Using the internet, research the Patient Care Partnership. Identify and explain three rights that the patient has according to the Patient Care Partnership. The Patient Care Partnership is replacing the SHAHS Patients’ Bill of Rights, this plain language brochure informs patients about what they should expect during their hospital tat with regard to their rights and responsibilities” (American Hospital Association, 2006-2014). Three of the rights that patients have are high quality hospital care, a clean and safe environment, and involvement in your care. High quality hospital care is the (American Hospital Association, 2006-2014). Hat was mentioned and that means the hospital provides the patient with all the care that they need when they need it, with skill, compassion and respect. Patients have the right to know the identity of their health care providers and others involved in your care as well (American Hospital Association, 2006-2014). The second priority mentioned is a clean and safe environment, this refers to hospital works hard to keep patients safe.

They use special policies and procedures to avoid errors in the patients care and keep them free from abuse or neglect (American Hospital Association, 2006-2014). And the last priority I mentioned was involvement in your care this consisted of the patient and their healthcare providers making decisions about their care before they go into the hospital. Other times these decisions are made while patients are in the hospital (American Hospital Association, 2006-2014). 4. Using the internet, research the Good Samaritan Law in your state. Summarize it and explain if it would apply to this case.

Georgians Good Samaritan Law states that a person nor physician can be held accountable for or sued if they are rendering care to an emergency victim as long as it is in good faith and within emergency situations. And physicians cannot be sued as long as nothing happened because of a physician’s willful and wanton negligence (n. A. , 2014). In this case study the Georgians Good Samaritan Law would apply to the actions that are taking place by the friends and the healthcare revisers. Due to the fact that the patient was incoherent and could not give consent of any kind is why the Good Samaritan Law would apply. 5.

Define the terms below and give an example of how each of these principles should be used in this case: “Respect means esteem for or a sense of the worth or excellence of a person, a personal quality or ability, or something considered as a manifestation of a personal quality or ability” (Dictionary. Com, 2014). “Empathy mean the intellectual identification with or secondhand undergoing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another” (Dictionary. Mom, 2014). “Dignity is the bearing, conduct, or speech indicative of self-respect or appreciation of the formality or gravity of an occasion or situation” (Dictionary. Mom, 2014). This this case study believe that each of these, (respect, empathy and dignity) were shown to the patient despite her incapacity to accept it. Her friends showed empathy and respect by getting her to healthcare heal as soon as it was possible. Respect, empathy and dignity was shown by the healthcare providers by doing whatever they could to make sure that the patient obtained proper and prompt latherer as soon as they were able, all the while trying without success to reach her next of kin.

Cite this Assignment 07.06 writing an argument Essay

Assignment 07.06 writing an argument Essay. (2018, Jun 04). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/assignment-07-06-writing-an-argument/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page