We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Audit case study Essay

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

3. a) Three parties that auditors might be held liable for negligence are : 1. Liability to client (Better Production & Co)
2. Liability to third party who use the information (Usahasama City Bank) 3. Liability to the foreseen user (who rely on the auditor’s financial statement)

b) No. Aiman & Co can not be held liable to Usahasama & Co. The only action available for financial loss caused by a false financial statement was in the tort of deceit. In order to succeed, the claimant (Usahasama) had to prove that Aiman & Co had acted dishonestly.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Audit case study
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

It was not enough to show that the loss suffered by the claimant was reasonably foreseeable. In the case of Hedly Byrne and Co vs Hedler and Partners Ltd, where there was a special relationship between parties, there could be a duty of care for financial loss caused by a negligent misstatement. However, there was a valid disclaimer as the advice given by Heller was headed without responsibility and the defendant was not liable.

In this case, Aiman & Co were not liable since there is no special relationship between parties and the advice given by Aiman & Co was headed without responsibility.

4. a) 4 precautions by auditor to avoid/ minimize the consequences of lawsuit : 1. Deal only with clients possessing integrity
2. Obtain an engagement and representation letter
3. Follow the standards of the profession
4. Maintain independence
b) Expectation Gap is the different between the actual and expected performance of an auditor. It can be defined as the difference between what the public and financial statement users believe the auditors are responsible for and what auditors themselves believe their responsibilities are. Factors contribute to Expectation Gap:

1. Auditor’s Deficient Performance
Deficient performance includes lack of experience, knowledge and care.

2. Deficient Standard
Deficient standard gap is the gap arising due to difference between what
auditors can reasonably be expected to do and what they are required to do by the current standards. Eg: investors are expecting auditors to detect fraud while auditor’s duty to detect fraud is limited.

3. Unreasonable Expectation
Unreasonable expectation is when public is expecting auditors to do what they are not required by the standards. It is mostly caused by the public ignorance and inexperience on the auditor’s duties. There are confusions concerning auditor’s duties in fraud detecting and reporting.

4. Lack of Auditor’s Independence
Auditors can be independent when they are not in positions that will make them compromise. It is important since it adds creditability to the report and is the basis of an audit work. Its inadequate can lead to the auditor’s opinion to be questioned.

c) Steps to be taken to bridge Expectation Gap:
1. Expansion of Auditors’ duties and responsibilities
Expansion of auditors’ duties will help to reduce the gap. It is impossible for the community to discard their expectation that auditor is a fraud detective. All auditors should possess basic knowledge of fraud detection in order to better position themselves to detect red flags during an audit. Auditors can start by developing basic understanding of fraud schemes and scenarios as well as reasons why people commit fraud.

2. Awareness of the Public
Explanation of audit function and limitations to the public can help to reduce the gap. This can be done in Annual General Meeting or be included as part of the audit report. This will help to reduce the unreasonable expectation gap since the public will be aware that their expectations are unrealistic.

3. Provision of more Clarity Auditing Standards
Auditing standards should be adjusted to make rules and regulations clearer to both public and auditor. Eg: The standard may show the clear statement
about auditor’s duties and responsibilities. But, it not as clear as to the public’s view since they have no auditing background. Therefore, the auditing standards should be clear with situations where auditors will and wont have duties such as going concern and fraud.

Cite this Audit case study Essay

Audit case study Essay. (2016, Dec 06). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/audit-case-study/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page