We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

New Structure of Reforms in Russia

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Проблемы России были огромны. Они простирались от сельскохозяйственного производства до отсутствия индустриализации в России до 1894 года. Жители Запада полагали, что лучший способ реформирования России – это перенять лучшие черты политической и экономической систем, которые использовались в Западной Европе.

Славянофилы восприняли это как посягательство на чистоту России, они считали западные ценности развращающими и призывали сохранить нацию как “ святую Русь ”. Это привело к политическим, социальным и экономическим беспорядкам, нанесшим вред стране. Однако западные решения не обязательно были приемлемыми для реформы в России, они нуждались в новой структуре реформ. Николай II столкнулся со всеми этими и другими проблемами во время своего восшествия на престол в 1894 году. Я изучу их, чтобы выявить основные проблемы, с которыми он столкнулся при вступлении на престол.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
New Structure of Reforms in Russia
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Земледелие было большой проблемой для Николая II. Сельское хозяйство России было неэффективным и бессистемным. Землю России лучше охарактеризовать как национальную слабость, а не силу. Несмотря на то, что четыре пятых населения составляли крестьяне, процветающая сельскохозяйственная экономика не развивалась.

Кроме того, только 6% земли можно было обрабатывать, поэтому нехватка земли и рост населения не помогли, поскольку все больше крестьян нуждались в работе, и был серьезный случай земельного голода. Однако в 1861 году крестьянам было разрешено покупать землю по указу об освобождении. Это вызвало еще больше проблем, поскольку теперь у семей были долги по выплате ссуд за землю, на выплату которой уйдут поколения. Высокая цена земли означала, что семьи не могли увеличить размер своей земли, и это вызывало проблемы, потому что по мере увеличения размера семьи количество доступной земли уменьшалось.

However grain exports increased as did the crop yields (By 50% between 1860 and 1910), this is good for the economy and finally shows some forwardness from Russian agriculture. Also now that the emancipation decree had been passed meant that more people and peasants will turn to farming leading to greater prosperity and also to less civil unrest if more peasants have money and jobs. Only 4 months of the Russian year could be farmed on and the weather was usually extreme, very hot or very cold.

This meant that farming suffered, as only a small period of the year could be farmed on during he summer as in the winter the weather was too extreme.

Also communication and transportation was difficult, as Russia had not met an industrial revolution yet, this affects farming because transportation of goods, exports and imports would be difficult, and cost more money to travel them. Finally strip farming was still being used and this is not economically forward, this method was used in England many years before and more productive forms of farming had be found.

Nicholas clearly faced vast problems with agriculture and I believe that this is his most important issue to tackle because arming also affects economical and social standards.Industrially Nicholas II seemed to be quite lucky in the timing of his accession.

In 1893 Russia entered a stage known as `the great spurt’. This led to the country growing rapidly in a short time, changing from an agricultural country to an industrial country. This obviously led to industrial expansion. Russia excelled on the world stage industrially; they had a growth rate of 8% per annum, the highest in the world.

This was good for the country as it led to a stable economy and more jobs, whilst also showing a forwardness and modernisation.However a large problem for the country was that the government viewed industrialisation as a means of improving the military strength of Russia. So the Russians still seem to think that expansion and a country’s power is based on the military and this could lead to the abandonment of other key features. Nicholas faced many problems through industrialisation.

Russia had a notorious backwardness, and lack of capital for industrial investment, so Nicholas had to ensure that industrially and at the same time financially Russia was safe due to the debts.To ensure economic survival Nicholas faced the rap of the public as he increased taxation, also with prices raised for the domestic customer. However the main industrial problem for Nicholas II and Russia was that they followed western ideas, when they needed brand new plans, as the west does not have the answers for Russia’s problems. Also Russia focussed too heavily on industrialisation ignoring other factors of need, like light industry and the social and political issues surrounding Russia.

Russia and Nicholas II faced industry problems, but in the early 1890’s the great spurt happened, mproving the industry in general, the economy and world trade. The Russian social structure also posed many a problem for Nicholas II, with early ideas of revolutions and unrest amongst peasants.The main problem socially was the social structure that placed peasants at the bottom and the upper classes at the top of a social pyramid. This meant that with the tsar wanting a dictatorship with one leader in an autocracy didn’t see the need for reform.

He had nobody challenging him, the various governmental bodies had little power and the only group with any power was the Orthodox Church, so they could confront he tsar. Russia contained many people of different race, language and origin; this caused conflict and proved hard for Nicholas to glorify Russia as this would lead to social unrest. Only 44 % of the people in the country were Russian, this was a problem, as Nicholas would have to control this many people over a wide and vast land.The tsar had total power and there was no power for the people, I think that this was a problem as the people of the country would felt that they have no say in affairs and lead to social unrest.

The government were very onservative and didn’t see the need for change; this is a problem as the autocracy is backwardness and democracy is the way forwards. Giving power to the people allows them to decide what the problems are and who they want to solve them and the tsar did not provide the public with any power and so they would be disliked and the public challenge Nicholas II due to his conservative views on the autocracy and the injustice of his social system. Socially and politically Nicholas’ biggest problem was to preserve the autocracy, as there was such a stigma against it from the people.Politically the tsar allowed no room for criticism, this meant that problems that were seen daily be the Russian people would be ignored by the tsar.

The most challenging factor politically is that Nicholas would not allow criticism leading to revolts. In Nicholas’ attempts to preserve autocracy he leads the country into frustration, violence and no outlet for criticism. He doesn’t see the need for reform but stays conservative in preserving the autocracy. Industrially Russia lags behind western countries like England, and agriculturally Russia suffers through land hunger.

Великий рывок – явный шаг вперед, но он испорчен выкупными сборами, деньгами, которые правительство занимало крестьян. Это вызывает противоречие между экономическими реформами. Сложные факторы были связаны с промышленными, сельскохозяйственными, экономическими, транспортными и политическими идеями, с которыми столкнулся Николай II при его восшествии на престол. Идея в том, что если вы хотите демократии и используете западные идеи, тогда вся система должна измениться.

Консервативный подход Николая к автократии означал, что Россия отстала в политическом, а также в социальном плане, а это означало, что он столкнулся с большим количеством проблем, пытаясь «очистить» Россию, чем раньше.

Cite this New Structure of Reforms in Russia

New Structure of Reforms in Russia. (2017, Nov 13). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/biggest-challenges-facing-nicholas-ii-accession-throne-c1894-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page