We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Case Analysis: Carruthers Poultry Products Inc. (CPP)

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

ACTG 2011 Section H

Function:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Case Analysis: Carruthers Poultry Products Inc. (CPP)
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

As an accounting adviser to your company, Carruthers Poultry Products Inc. ( CPP ) my function is to analyse the company’s economic activity, and measure any accounting issues that may show themselves. My analysis of the current standing of CPP will enable me to project indifferent recommendations for the usage of accomplishing CPP’s chief aims.

Main Users:

The first chief user of your fiscal statements will be you, the proprietors and stockholders of CPP. Bing the primary stockholders of the company, you take a direct involvement as to find how to continue with future investings and company enlargement.

Your chief aim is to turn the concern, and hence to be able to tap into a larger dividend pool. Thereby, your chief involvement falls within maximising the company net incomes, and your hard currency flows. The 2nd primary user of the fiscal statements is the private creditor, whom has financed CPP with a $ 700,000 line of recognition. They require CPP to supply their one-year fiscal statements, within 90 yearss of their year-end.

Their aim is to guarantee CPP repays the loan. The concluding users of CPP’s fiscal statements would be the Canadian Revenue Agency ( CRA ) , every bit good the Canadian Food Inspection Agency ( CFIA ) , who would be interested in the economic activity of the company, as to justify they are runing in conformity to their parametric quantities. The most of import user of the fiscal statements would be you, the three stockholders of the company. Keeping tantamount control of the company, you are responsible for modulating its concern activities, and keep the largest interest in CPP’s viability.

Conflicts and Constraints:

The first restraint to see is CPP’s accounting policies. Bing a private company, they have the option to utilize ASPE, IFRS, or their ain regulative policies. ASPE is more trim to private companies, being simplistic, while IFRS is used by public companies, mensurating with a higher grade of item. Due to the fact that CPP wants to spread out, into the US peculiarly, I recommend the internationally recognized IFRS. The 2:1 ratio demanded from the private creditor is the following restraint. It is conditional, as it is dependent on CPP geting the $ 700,000 loan from the creditor. The concluding restraint is the CFIA’s Food Act. CPP must stay to the policies this act expects. There is besides a struggle that arises from user aims. The chief stockholders want to develop CPP, which requires increased hard currency flows ( investing financed through plausible debt ) . At the same clip CPP wants a D/E ratio of 2:1, which is unrealistic.

Issues:

1.Liquid and Inventory Turnover Ratio

In the analysis of your fiscal statements, issues are apparent. Appropriate perpendicular and horizontal analysis’ can be found in B1. First, the sum of stock list CPP is keeping in 2014 is outrageously high. Compared to the anterior twelvemonth, CPP is keeping 4.1 times every bit much ( A15 ) . In the horizontal analysis found in B2, your stock list history in 2014 was 410 % larger than in 2013. Consequently, your Inventory Turnover Ratio in 2014 was 19.31 ( A16 ) . This is straight correlated with your lessening in hard currency flows for 2014. The copiousness of stock list you have in stock has hindered your gross revenues, so much so that you have negative hard currency in 2014. This speaks to your company’s liquidness, or instead, deficiency of. Despite your positive net incomes, hard currency is needed to fulfill liabilities, and with a shortage of hard currency, you are non able to actively back up yourself. This deficit can besides be affiliated with your Histories Receivable. Your Argon for 2014 are about 50 % of your entire assets. I would urge diminishing your recognition footings, as to promote rapid payment. This is farther supported by the fact that in 2013 your speedy ratio was 1.3:1, diminishing to 0.66:1 in 2014 ( A17 ) . This bead in your liquid assets is refering, as it exemplifies a worsening support construction. Consequently, your solvency- the ability to run into long-run duties is weak. With a current D/E ratio of 21.14:1, ROE is about $ 5.26 on each dollar of equity. This may look executable, nevertheless to investors this, coupled with the negative hard currency flow of 2014, does non do CPP look feasible.

2.Investing in CTR

The first issue brought to visible radiation is whether CPP ought to put in CTR Meat Processing Ltd. ( CTR ) . CPP can buy 19 % of CTR’s common portions, thereby geting important influence of this company. Despite the fact that IFRS denotes important influence as refering to 20-50 % of the ballots within the investee company, CPP’s extra acquisition of seats within CTR’s assorted committees increase effectual control. Investing translates to the acquisition of 2/7 seats on CTR’s board of managers, every bit good as another two seats on the Risk Management Committee of the company, which has a high degree of influence on the board of managers themselves. Control of these four musca volitanss suggests important influence on the tactical determinations for company enterprises. If CPP were to enter this investing, it would ab initio be accounted for utilizing the equity method on the balance sheet. It would be recorded at cost, capitalized as an plus with a value of $ 132,525 ( Appendix A1 ) :

Dr. Investment in CTR $ 132,525

Cr. Cash $ 132,525

From this point of record, each hereafter period would necessitate to be re-adjusted by the investor’s portion of the net income of CTR less dividends declared. In footings of their income statement, CPP would describe an equity accounted income of $ 114,000 ( A2 ) . CTR has historically reported uninterrupted net incomes of $ 600,000, and has paid $ 2.00/share in dividends. Investing in CTR would increase CPP’s dividend income by $ 17,100 ( A3 ) , which we deduct from CPP’s income of $ 114,000:

Dr. Investment into CTR $ 96,900

Cr. Income from Equity Investment $ 96,900

Through the acquisition of CTR’s portions, CPP will hold an increased net income, every bit good as an increased dividend pool, two factors that coincide with company aims. Furthermore, CTR is portion of the processing section of the domestic fowl industry, so puting in this company will assist CPP spread out from entirely being a distributer in this industry, vertically turning CPP.

In order to put in CTR, you are sing publishing a bond in order to raise the financess needed to anticipate the funding of this chance. I would extremely deter this, as CPP presently has a D/E ratio of 21.14:1 ( A4 ) . Despite the advantages of this investing, debt would adhere CPP to farther payments, which may turn out to be hard sing your current negative hard currency place. I believe you would fight to keep these one-year payments, impeding your company from operating to its full potency. Therefore, I do non urge publishing a bond to cover this venture, nevertheless you may desire to look into private equity funding, possibly. It may come at the cost of cut downing the ownership of the three chief stockholders of the company, but would still enable you to impel CPP to spread out.

3.To Buy or to Rent

In order to put in CTR, CPP must either purchase and finance, or rent a bringing truck. First, if CPP were to see buying the $ 76,000 truck, they would necessitate to finance it with an 8 % per annum loan. This does non look like a feasible option for the company one time once more, as incurring a bank loan at this point in clip would badly increase your debt-to-equity ratio, which you need to acquire to 2:1, as per your conditional compact with the private creditor. The present value of loan payments would compare to $ 82,985.29 ( A6 ) , financing which you can non back up at the minute. Contrariwise, you are able to rent a bringing truck. Under IFRS, we can reason that this option would be rectified as a capital rental. As per the standard for a capital rental: 1 ) The leaseholder will probably achieve ownership of the leased plus after the leasing term, 2 ) The leaseholder receives most of the economic benefits of the leased plus during the term ( 75 % of utile life ) , 3 ) The present value of the rental payments represents most of the assets just value ( 90 % ) . Standard 3 is met, as the present value of the rental payments is $ 67,906.25 ( A5 ) , which is 90 % of its just value ( $ 67,906.25/ $ 76,000=89 % ) . Thereby, the rental of the truck is a capital rental:

Upon Purchase( A5 ) : Dr. Delivery Truck $ 67 906.25

Cr. Lease Liability $ 67 906.25

Depreciation Exp.(A7 ):Dr. Depreciation Expense $ 16974.50

Cr. Accumulated Depreciation $ 16974.50

Interest Exp.( A8 ) : Dr. Interest Expense $ 1640

Dr. Lease Liability $ 18860

Cr. Cash $ 20 500

Therefore, in the context of whether to finance or rent the bringing truck, I recommend non taking out a loan from the bank, and renting this plus. It will decrease the impact on your debt-to-equity ratio sporadically, and the acquisition of this vehicle is imperative for your investment activities in CTR for daily operations, so of your options renting would be the best pick.

4.Probable Changes in the CFIA and Food Act

The last issue sing your investment activities in CTR involves the appropriate regulative patterns that may be employed around the importation and exportation of nutrient within the processing section of the industry. It is proposed that in 2015 the CFIA will necessitate nutrient processors to use traceability systems within concerns and supervise the development of care and bar programs. These systems will cut down the costs associated with at hand callbacks. However, nutrient processors such as CTR will hold to extensively update their current systems as to accommodate to these new processs. Although non quantifiable, it is extremely likely that this will necessitate internal funding-decreasing hard currency flows. The chief issue we must see with these processors is whether or non they should be capitalized or expensed. Under IFRS, plus standards denotes: a ) hereafter benefit/ quantifiability, B ) control, and degree Celsius ) consequence of past dealing. It is appropriate to reason that the processors will supply future benefit, appealing to salvage CTR financess lost in callbacks. They are mensurable, as one time announced in 2015, the processors will be quantified in cost. Next, the companies who employ these systems on premiss will hold control over them. Finally, they will be the consequence of a past dealing, as the company will hold to blast out support for them. Therefore:

Dr. Capital Asset ( Processors ) Thirty

Cr. CashXXX

They would be consequently depreciated over their utile life:

Dr. Depreciation ExpenseXXX

Cr. Accumulated DepreciationXXX

Despite non being able to quantify this on your current fiscal statements, I recommend entering this as a subsequent event. Bing one that occurs after the year-end of the company in 2014, you are merely required to unwrap it in your notes. This is good to possible investors, as this revelation of information is utile for calculating future hard currency flows and effectivity.

5.Investing in CGI

CPP’s other appealing investing chance is Chicken Galore Inc. ( CGI ) , a US domestic fowl distributer. Unlike in CTR, CPP will hold commanding involvement of CGI, making a demand for amalgamate statements. Under IFRS, for a parent company to keep control of its subordinate, it must presume over 50 % of its ballots. CPP will keep 75 % of CGI’s outstanding portions, so presuming that a portion is a ballot, this dogma is fulfilled. They will besides get 3/5 seats on the board of managers, enabling concern determinations without all member audience. The net identifiable assets of CGI would be recorded on CPP’s balance sheet at their historical cost. Upon investing into CGI:

Dr. Investment in CGI $ 4,500,000

Dr. Goodwill $ 1,625,000

Cr. Accounts Collectible $ 5,000,000

Cr. Non-Controlling Interest $ 1,250,000

Since CPP does non keep 100 % of control in CGI, you must account for non-controlling involvement. This history quantifies the net assets of CGI that are owned by non-parent shareholders- $ 1,125,000 ( A10 ) . Consequently, the measure of net income that is owned by non-parent stockholders would be $ 125,000 ( A11 ) , based CGI’s historical net incomes of $ 500,000. The staying $ 375,000 of net income would be movable to CPP’s net income, reported in maintained earnings- adhering to your chief aim of spread outing the company’s net incomes. I believe it would be in your best involvement to put in CGI, as opposed to CTR. CGI can be financed through vendor-take back which provides optimum flexibleness, and may be the lone method of funding you are considered for. Furthermore, the $ 375,000 of forecasted net income from CGI can be utilized as payment. Consequently, CGI does non necessitate the purchase/lease of a vehicle, it lacks the complications CTR has around funding steps, and it ceases to demand future alterations in its systems. It is an international distributer, and has the ability to spread out your company horizontally ( in the same section across states ) . Most significantly CPP can reassign its stock list to its subordinate, rectifying their minimum hard currency flows. I believe that CGI would be a much better tantrum for your current aims of enlargement and subsequent dividend growing. Under IFRS you will necessitate to unwrap extra information for whichever investing you choose ( section info, consolidation, etc. )

6.Snuff outing the Line of Credit

In order to publish a new bond at a voucher rate of 8 % , you have decided to snuff out your current line of recognition. Assuming the bond besides has a FV of $ 700,000 the one-year payment CPP would be obligated to pay would be $ 56,000 ( A12 ) , as opposed to the old $ 70,000 ( A13 ) .

This seems to be good, as you will hold lower one-year payments, thereby maintaining hard currency flow higher, adhering to this aim. However, in order to achieve this bond, CPP must achieve a D/E ratio of 2:1. Presently sitting at 21.14:1, this is improbable. I do non urge snuff outing your current line of recognition, as it is highly doubtful that you will be able to keep this compact. The bond is besides retractable, intending if you violate the D/E ratio your support is cut off. Keeping the current funding system you have in topographic point would be my recommendation to you. It may salvage you from farther debt and even greater negative hard currency flows in future financial periods.

7.Replacing Dividends with Salary and Bonus

There is an issue in respects to the deductions of changing CPP’s current dividends. You are looking into paying yourselves, the stockholders of CPP, wages and fillips, alternatively of dividends. This would take down the net income of CPP, as you would necessitate to write off the harmonizing payouts. Dividends are non an expense- they are recorded as a remotion from retained net incomes, and hence do non consequence net income. I would urge non using this system in your company, as to go on declaring dividends, and redistributing the wealth of your company in this manner:

Upon declaration: Dr. Retained EarningsXXX

Cr. Dividends PayableXXX

Upon payment: Dr. Dividends PayableXXX

Cr. Cash Thirty

However, you may non be able to declare dividends this twelvemonth, as you have negative hard currency on manus, and paying out dividends would farther impede your ability to run into your duties.

Decision:

Overall, I feel that this study has analyzed the retrospective concern activities of CPP, and has provided you with indifferent, yet effectual recommendations for proficient usage to achieve your chief aims. I hope that this study meets your fiscal demands, and enables strategic decision-making. Thank you for using my services, I wish you all the best in the hereafter. Respects,

Olivia Worona

APPENDIX A

A1: Cost of puting into CTR

19 % of 45,000 portions were purchased by CPP at $ 15.50 per portion:

= 0.19 ten 45000 ten 15.50 = $ 132, 525

A2: CPP’s portion of CTR’s net income

CTR makes $ 600,000 after revenue enhancements, and CPP owns 19 % of them:

= ( 600,000 ) x 0.19

= $ 114, 000

A3: CPP’s dividend income

8, 550 portions x $ 2.00 per portion = $ 17, 100

A4: CPP’s Debt- To-Equity Ratio

D/E= $ 2,529,782 / $ 119,626 = 21.14

A5: PV of the Lease

PV =$ 67, 906.25

Interest on Lease= $ 20,500 * 0.08 = $ 1640

PV of Lease/Purchase Price= $ 67,898.60/ $ 76,000 = 89.34 %

Depreciation Under Capital Lease:$ 67,898.60/4 old ages = $ 16,974.50 per twelvemonth of lease term

A6: PV of the Loan

Cash Paid in Period = ( 76000/4 ) + 76000 ten 0.08 = $ 25,080

PV=$ 82,985.29

A7: Straight Line Depreciation of the Loan

=67,898.60/4 = $ 16974.50/yr

A8: Interest Expense

=0.08 ten 76, 000 = $ 6080

A9: Calculation of Goodwill

$ 5,000,000 = 75 % of CPP Valuation, Value of CPP = $ 5,000,000/0.75 = $ 6,666,666.66

Goodwill Amount:( Value of Company – Net Identifiable Assets ) *percentage of Goodwill owned: ( $ 6,666,666.66- $ 4,500,000 ) *0.75 = $ 1,625,000

Non-Controlling Interest:% of Net Identifiable Assetss Owned by Subsidiary ( non owned by CPP ) = $ 4,500,000 * 0.25 = $ 1,125,000

A10: Net Assetss owned by non-parent stockholders

= Net Assets x % of non-parent stockholders

= $ 4,500,000 x 25 %

= $ 1,125,000

A11: Net Income owned by non-parent stockholders

= Net Income x % of non-parent stockholders

= $ 500,000 x 25 %

= $ 125,000

A12: Annual Interest of New Bond

=Face Value of Bond x Coupon Rate

= $ 700,000 x 8 %

= $ 56,000

A13: Annual Interest of Line of Credit

= Line of Credit x Interest Rate

= $ 700,000 x 10 %

= $ 70,000

A14: Calculation of New Bond

Returns from bond issue= PV of rente + PV

PV=$ 82,985.29

A15: Inventory of 2014 compared to 2013

=Inventory of 2014/Inventory of 2013

=1,418,931/346,158

= 4.1

A16: Inventory Turnover Ratio ( ITO ) 2014

ITO 2014 = Total Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory

= 17,042,189/ ( ( 1,418,931 +346,148 ) /2 )

= 19.31

A17: Quick Ratios

i? 2013

= ( Current Assets-Inventories ) / Current Liabilitiess

= ( $ 1,836,122- $ 346,158 ) / $ 1,136,497

=1.31

i? 2014

= ( Current Assets-Inventories ) / Current Liabilitiess

= ( $ 2,649,408- $ 1,418,931 ) / $ 1,829,782

=0.67

A18: Roe

= 2014 net income/ norm common stockholders equity

= $ 314,822 / ( ( $ 119,626 + ( $ 5 ) ) /2 )

= $ 5.26/ each dollar of equity

APPENDIX B

Vertical ( histories as a per centum of elements of same twelvemonth ) and horizontal ( tendencies between histories of same type ) analysis’ :

Macintosh HD:Users:Olivia:Desktop:Screen Shot 2014-11-17 at 5.32.23 PM.png

Macintosh HD:Users:Olivia:Desktop:Screen Shot 2014-11-17 at 5.32.48 PM.png

Cite this Case Analysis: Carruthers Poultry Products Inc. (CPP)

Case Analysis: Carruthers Poultry Products Inc. (CPP). (2017, Jul 16). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/case-analysis-carruthers-poultry-products-inc-cpp-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page