case study evaluating the role and functions of the nurse and the effectiveness of nursing care within a rehabilitation context - Nursing Essay Example
A case study evaluating the role and functions of the nurse and the effectiveness of nursing care within a rehabilitation context
In recent years there have been an increasing number of people requiring rehabilitation in the UK (Jester, 2007). Rehabilitation can be defined as “an active process which seeks to reduce the effects of disease (in its broadest sense) on daily life” (Greenwood et al, 1993. cited by Davis & O’Connor, 2001, p.4). Rehabilitation nursing can be identified as a philosophy of care: an approach to any individual who needs assistance with their ability to function in life (Tracey, 2001). With assistance from a mentor, on a recent continuing and supportive care placement, a suitable patient was selected on which to base this case study. To ensure that ethical and legal responsibilities of confidentiality are maintained, any personal details have been altered to ensure anonymity, and consent obtained from the patient (Nursing & Midwifery Council, NMC, 2008). A brief introduction to the patient and the care setting will follow.
essay sample on "case study evaluating the role and functions of the nurse and the effectiveness of nursing care within a rehabilitation context"? We will write a cheap essay sample on "case study evaluating the role and functions of the nurse and the effectiveness of nursing care within a rehabilitation context" specifically for you for only $12.90/page
More Nursing Essay Topics.
The pathophysiology of pressure ulcer formation will first be considered, followed by a discussion on the discharge process from a hospital to a community setting. The roles and functions of the nurses involved in the rehabilitation of the patient will then be explored, before conclusions drawn as to the effectiveness of the care provided.
Mary was an eighty-nine year old lady encountered whilst on an extended practice placement, based in a community nursing team. She lived in a local residential care home, which we visited regularly to provide nursing support to the carers. Mary had been under the care of the district nursing team as she had developed a grade I pressure ulcer on her sacrum (European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, EPUAP, 2010). The nurses offered advice about pressure area care and ordered pressure relieving equipment, to help prevent further deterioration of her skin integrity. Mary then developed a serious chest infection, requiring hospital admission. She remained in hospital for eighteen days, undergoing two courses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, before being discharged to the care home.
The community nursing team was not informed of her discharge and received a telephone call from the carers, concerned about Mary’s pressure area. On inspection, the sacral wound had deteriorated from a grade I to a grade III pressure ulcer (EPUAP, 2010) and was causing Mary a great deal of discomfort. It was also noted that her mobility had significantly reduced and she had very little strength to be able to maintain her independence in fulfilling her Activities of Daily Living (Roper et al, 2000). The discharge letter from the hospital made no reference to Mary’s skin integrity and stated that she was self-caring. The district nurse discussed with the patient and carers the need for regular dressing changes to the wound and also recommended physiotherapy to help Mary regain strength and mobility. With their agreement, a referral was made to the intermediate care team (ICT) to assess Mary’s needs and take over her care; an ICT nurse conducted a comprehensive, holistic assessment of Mary.
With patient and carer involvement, a series of goals were set to identify healthcare needs, address how these would be met and the expected time scale. Mary underwent physiotherapy to strengthen her muscles and improve mobility; she also received input from the occupational therapist (OT) who supplied equipment to enable Mary to maintain as much independence as possible; the nurses visited twice weekly to assess her wound and change the dressing; Mary’s general practitioner (GP) was also involved in her care and prescribed analgesia.
The skin is the largest organ in the body and performs essential homeostatic, sensory and protective roles (Pedley, 2006). The ageing process causes changes to skin function and integrity; a reduction in elastic and collagen fibres cause deterioration in skin shape and strength, while poorer circulation reduces the amount of oxygen and nutrients reaching the tissues and causes a build up of waste products (Waugh & Grant, 2006). Other factors also affecting skin integrity are poor nutritional status, sensory impairment, incontinence and co-morbidities (Lewis et al, 1998; Waugh & Grant, 2006); the elderly are therefore more vulnerable to skin damage (Pedley, 2006). Impaired skin integrity may lead to severe nerve and tissue damage and an increased risk of infection (Lewis et al, 1998).
Pressure sores, also known as pressure ulcers or decubitus ulcers, occur over pressure points, commonly bony prominences, where areas of skin may be compressed for long periods of time against a hard surface, or caused by friction or shearing forces (EPUAP, 2009). When this occurs, tissues are damaged and blood flow to that area is compromised, resulting in ischaemia (Lewis et al, 1998). Initially the skin reddens, but as the pressure continues ischaemia and necrosis occur, causing the skin to slough, leading to ulceration which may enlarge into a cavity as underlying tissues and structures are also damaged (Royal College of Nursing, RCN, 2001). As an octogenarian, Mary was more prone to skin damage, as already identified; combined with reduced mobility and many hours sitting in one position, this contributed to her development of a grade I pressure ulcer. When Mary developed the chest infection this would have further compromised her tissue oxygenation, as her lungs would have been less effective in gaseous exchange, resulting in reduced blood oxygen saturation (Waugh & Grant, 2006) and increased her risk of tissue necrosis.
Numerous classification and staging systems exist to assess pressure ulcers and review the effectiveness of treatment (Pedley, 2006). In the UK, the tool most commonly used is the Stirling System (Reid & Morrison, 1994) (Appendix 1: NHS Quality Improvement Scotland, 2005). EPUAP have recently published new international guidelines for both pressure ulcer prevention and treatment, which include a grading scale; their aim is to share evidence-based practice and standardize the assessment and treatment of pressure ulcers across international boundaries (Black et al, 2007; EPUAP, 2010). The district nurse identified Mary’s initial pressure ulcer as grade I, non-blanchable erythema; the patients sacral skin was reddened and did not blanche when gentle pressure was applied, but the skin surface remained intact. However, on discharge from hospital the wound was determined grade III as she had sustained full-thickness damage to the sacral tissue, including subcutaneous layer, with some areas of necrosis.
According to Courtenay (2002), in the majority of cases pressure ulcers are preventable and their development can be an indication of poor quality nursing care; however, every member of the multi-disciplinary team has a role to play in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (Lewis & Roberts, 1988). In this instance, Mary’s initial pressure ulcer was preventable by educating both the patient and staff about the importance of regular position change to prevent pressure damage occurring in the first place. Once in hospital, it should have been possible to prevent further deterioration of the wound with adequate interventions, such as pressure relieving devices and regular turning (Chambers, 2002); however, with Mary’s chest severe chest infection their primary concern, it would have been necessary to position Mary sitting in an upright position to maximise lung capacity, but would have applied additional pressure to the sacral region. Also, some evidence suggests that once the initial damage has been caused, it is not uncommon for wounds to quickly break down, from a superficial wound to a large ulceration (Lippincott et al, 2008) and this may have been inevitable in Mary’s case.
As Mary returned home from hospital, her discharge was planned and implemented by the nurses and other members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). According to Birmingham (2004, cited by Macleod, 2006, p. 43), discharge planning is a process whereby the patient’s needs are identified before a plan is formed to facilitate a smooth transfer from one environment to another. The aims of discharge planning are to co-ordinate resources and enhance the patient’s involvement in their care and decision-making (Efraimsson et al, 2004; Billings & Kowalski, 2008). Smith (1996) argues that it should also aim to achieve continuity of care, whereby a well orchestrated discharge ensures that adequate and appropriate care continues after leaving an acute setting.
One of the most important elements of successful discharge planning is communication (Sequeira, 1991. cited by Smith, 1996, p. 39). The importance of effective communication and interprofessional collaboration has been recognised for many years (Miers & Pollard (2009), and forms an integral part of many national policies, such as The NHS Plan (Department of Health (DH), 2000). Indeed, there are many benefits of effective interprofessional collaboration, such as enabling capitalisation of skills or expertise and streamlining care, with less duplication of efforts (Belza, 2007; Rudd & Smith, 2002). Also, more importantly, the patient benefits from effective collaboration through improved outcomes, continuity of care and cost-effective service provision (Belza, 2007). Kripalani et al (2007) believe that there substantial deficits in communication between acute and primary care settings; they feel that the traditional discharge summary does not provide the optimum method of communicating timely, accurate and important medical information to those responsible for follow-up care.
Adhiyaman (2000. cited by Kripalani et al, 2007) states that inaccurate information about a patient’s hospitalization can lead to faulty decision-making or failure to monitor a patient’s condition during their after care. This is supported by Rothschild et al (2001), who believe that faulty transfer information can result in adverse incidents, such as drug errors and unplanned hospital readmission. When Mary was discharged from hospital there, unfortunately, appeared to be a significant breakdown in communication between the acute and primary care teams. The district nursing team were not informed of her discharge, so were unable to take over her care when required. Also, the discharge letter given to Mary was lacking in information and failed to mention the deterioration of both her pressure ulcer and mobility. As has been suggested, these factors significantly affected the continuity in Mary’s care, delayed appropriate interventions from being implemented, and may have put her at risk of readmission to hospital.
To enable appropriate and effective care to take place once in the community, it was necessary for the district nurses to undertake several roles within the MDT. The roles of the nurse in the rehabilitation context are numerous and varied (Whitelock, 2001; Long et al, 2002); however, Low (2003) believes that although nurses have an integral role in patient rehabilitation, their boundaries are often blurred with other members of the healthcare team. Jester (2007) develops this theory by suggesting that the role of nurses in rehabilitation in the UK generally remains underdeveloped. She argues that nurses are struggling to find their identity as a specific role within rehabilitation, which can lead to confusion and uncertainty for other members of the MDT, patients and carers (Jester, 2007). In contrast, Smith (1999) identified six main nursing roles in rehabilitation: technical expert and provider or care, psychological support, educator, coordinator, teamworker, and evaluator. Others have suggested additional roles such as counsellor, advocate, researcher and goal-setter (Davis & O’Connor, 2001; Whitelock, 2001; Pryor & Smith, 2002). Due to word limitation, the roles
and functions of the nurse being considered are those most pertinent to care of Mary; these have been identified as nursing expertise and care provision, education and coordination.
The provision of care is one of the most basic elements of nursing (RCN, 2003). Once described by Carper (1978) as the ‘art of nursing’, a nurses’ knowledge and ability to care is fundamental to the profession, and essential for nursing care to be effective (DH, 1999; RCN 2003). The nurse’s role is to provide holistic care in order to meet all the needs of the patient, such as psychosocial or spiritual and not merely the physical (McCarthy, 2006). Expertise is also of crucial importance; as the nursing role has developed and expanded, so too has to the need to acquire greater knowledge and clinical skills (Robinson & Vaughan, 1992). Indeed it is a legal requirement of nurses to ensure that their knowledge and skills are kept up to date and the best available evidence is used to inform their practice (NMC, 2008).
When the community nursing team first began caring for Mary, a comprehensive, holistic assessment was conducted to identify her healthcare needs and to help plan appropriate interventions (Bowie, 2001). The questions that were asked included how Mary felt within herself, her outlook on life, and her perception of body image, although the majority of the assessment did focus on her physical capabilities and healthcare problems. Mary may have benefited from greater opportunities to express her feelings about the things most important to her, rather than following the rigid structure of questions and answers. However, from the assessment, the nurse was able to determine Mary’s primary needs as pressure area care and mobility, which were causing her a great deal of anxiety and frustration. The nurses used their knowledge and expertise in identifying the grading of the pressure ulcer and in determining the most suitable treatment to promote optimal healing.
When it became apparent that Mary would require additional support from other healthcare professionals, the nurses discussed the possible options with Mary and her carers. Patient involvement in the planning and
decision-making of their care is pivotal in providing person-centred care (McCormack & McCance, 2006); a concept which fundamental to many government initiatives and policies such as The Essence of Care (DH, 2001a) and The National Service Framework for Older People (DH, 2001b). The nurses sought at every opportunity to involve both Mary and her carers in all the decisions about her care; this involved providing them with adequate information so that they were able to make informed choices.
The nurses’ role as educator is also essential within the rehabilitation context (Barnett, 1999; Wiles et al, 2001). Peniket & Grove (2007) believe that rehabilitation is an education-based discipline; an integral part of the nurses’ role is to provide education and information, whilst modelling evidence-based practice (Peniket & Grove, 2007). It not only helps the individual to make informed choices about care, as already discussed, but also promotes mental wellbeing, as the patient is able to feel included and in control of their care (Basford & Slevin, 2003). The nurses were able to offer advice and education about pressure area care, so that both Mary and her carers were aware of how best to prevent further tissue damage and promote healing, such as the need for regular position change and the use of pressure-relieving devices. They were also able to offer advice regarding Mary’s mobility, such as the optimal way to aid transfer between bed and chair, and by encouraging deep breathing exercises to prevent a recurrent chest infection.
However, the nurses also realised the need for referral to other services, to ensure that Mary received the complete and holistic care that she required. According to Lindeke & Sieckart (2005. cited by Hall et al, 2007, p.69), no profession can stand alone, but is dependent on the knowledge and skills of other health care professionals, in order to practice successfully and provide a complete service. Jasper (2003) states that is it important for the individual to be aware of their own competencies, so that when one’s own skills or knowledge are lacking an appropriate referral is made, to ensure patient safety is maintained and that the best possible care is delivered. This is also another requirement of the NMC (2008); a nurse must work cooperatively within teams, respecting the skills, expertise and
contributions of colleagues, make referrals to other practitioners when it is in the best interests of an individual under their care, and must be able to delegate effectively (NMC, 2008). The nurses identified that the expertise of physiotherapists and OT’s were required to provide Mary with a comprehensive care service. By coordinating Mary’s care, a prompt referral to the intermediate care team ensured that her additional needs were swiftly addressed and treatment could be commenced at the earliest opportunity. The nurses also liaised with the GP to ensure Mary received the appropriate medication and analgesia she required. Coordinating her care in this way ensured that all the healthcare professionals who needed to be involved were, and that each professional was aware of the others’ input; this helped to ensure continuity of care whilst preventing a duplication of services and waste of resources.
The purpose of this essay was to consider the roles of the nurse in a rehabilitation context, by way of examining a patient case study, to determine the effectiveness of these roles in the delivery of patient care. The pathophysiology of pressure ulcer development identified the potential risk factors for this elderly patient and helped to explain how her wound developed from a grade I to a grade III pressure ulcer; however, the fact that the majority of pressure ulcers are as a result of poor nursing care, this entire scenario may have been prevented. The discharge planning process was seriously flawed; what should have resulted in a clear, prompt referral from acute to primary care was lacking. This had a detrimental affect on the patient’s wellbeing and recovery as this caused a delay in the district nursing assessment, treatment and subsequent referrals to other members of the MDT. Good communication is key to effective interprofessional collaboration and in ensuring the safety or patients under our care; when this is lacking patient care suffers. This essay has identified that nurses play an integral role in the rehabilitative care of their patients. Their role may be vast and complex, but the boundaries between other health professionals is often blurred and there may be difficulty in clearly defining the exact nurses’ roles. Due to word limitation, the nurses’ roles in this scenario could only be briefly explored. The three main roles were identified in the care of Mary were
nursing expertise and care provision, education and coordination. From the literature discussed and the interventions of the nurses involved, these three main roles were undertaken effectively and were of benefit to the patient. However, many other roles, such as those advocacy and teamworking were also apparent. With the increasingly elderly population we are facing and the move towards greater levels of care in the community, the nurses’ role in the rehabilitation of patients will grow significantly over the coming years. It is essential that nurses are aware of the impact their roles can have on patient rehabilitation, and strive to improve education, knowledge and skills in this area to ensure the delivery of a high standard of patient care.
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (2005) Best Practice Statement – November 2005: Pressure Ulcer Prevention
Barnett, D. (1999) ‘The rehabilitation nurse as educator – the education of clients’ in Smith, M. (ed) Rehabilitation in Adult Nursing Practice, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Basford, L. & Slevin, O. (2003) Theory and Practice of Nursing: An integrated approach to caring practice. (2nd Edn.) Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Belza, B. (2007) ‘Interprofessional Collaboration: Using the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People’, Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33 (10), pp. 3. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 11 June 2009) Billings, D.M. & Kowalski, K. (2008) ‘Transition From Hospital to Home Care: What Gets Lost Between the Discharge Plan and the Real World?’, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39 (5), pp. 198-199. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 11 June 2009) Black, J. et al (2007) ‘National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel’s Updated Pressure Ulcer Staging System’, Dermatology Nursing, 19 (4), pp. 343-349. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ww.ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 21 June 2010) Bowie, I. (2001) ‘Assessment in rehabilitation’ in Davis, S. & O’Connor, S. (eds) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Carper, B. (1978) ‘Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in Nursing’,
Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), pp. 13-23 Chambers, N. (2002) ‘Wound Management’, in Hogston, R. & Simpson, P.M (ed.) Foundations of Nursing Practice – Making the Difference. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 313-342. Courtenay, M. (2002) ‘Movement and Mobility’, in Hogston, R. & Simpson, P.M (ed.) Foundations of Nursing Practice – Making the Difference. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 262-285. Davis, S. & O’Connor (2001) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Department of Health (1999) Making a difference: strengthening the nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and healthcare – summary, London: DH. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007599 (Accessed 29 June 2008) Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform, London: DH. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4002960 (Accessed 19 June 2009)
Department of Health (2001a) The Essence of Care: Patient-focused benchmarking for healthcare practitioners. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4005475 (Accessed 18 January 2009) Department of Health (2001b) National Service Framework for Older People – Executive Summary, London: DH. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4010161 (Accessed 21 June 2010) Efraimsson, E. et al (2003) ‘Discharge planning: ‘fooling ourselves?’ – patient participation in conferences’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, pp. 562-570, OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com (Accessed 19 June 2009) European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2009) International Guidelines – Prevention of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Available at: http://www.epuap.org/guidelines.html (Accessed 21 June 2010) European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2010) International Guidelines – Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Available at: http://www.epuap.org/guidelines.html (Accessed 21 June 2010) Hall, P. et al (2005) ‘Developing collaborative person-centred practice: A pilot project on
a palliative care unit’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1) pp. 69-81. ASSIA [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com (Accessed 17 May 2008) Jasper, M. (2003) Beginning Reflective Practice: Foundations in Nursing and Health Care. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Jester, R. (2007) Advancing Practice in Rehabilitation Nursing, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Kripalani, S. et al (2007) ‘Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care Physicians: Implications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care’, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297 (8), pp. 831-841. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com (Accessed 19 June 2009) Lewis, K. & Roberts, L. (1998) ‘Skin Integrity’, in Mallik, M., Hall, C. & Howard, D. (ed.) Nursing Knowledge & Practice – A Decision-Making Approach. London: Baillière Tindall, pp. 248-280. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (2008) Wound Care Made Incredibly Visual. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Long, A.F. et al (2002) ‘The role of the nurse within the multi-professional rehabilitation team’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37 (1), pp. 70-78. EBSCOhost [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com (Accessed 21 June 2010)
Low, G. (2003) ‘Developing the nurse’s role in rehabilitation’, Nursing Standard, 17 (45), pp. 33-38. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ww.ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 21 June 2010) Macleod, A. (2006) ‘The nursing role in preventing delay in patient discharge’, Nursing Standard, 21 (1), pp. 43-48. McCarthy, B. (2006) ‘Translating person-centred care: a case study of preceptor nurses and their teaching practices in acute care areas’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(5), pp. 629-638. ASSIA [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com (Accessed 15 May 2008) McCormack, B. & McCance, T.V. (2006) ‘Development of a framework for person-centred nursing’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(5), pp. 472-479. ASSIA [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.com (Accessed 17 May 2008) Miers, M. & Pollard, K. (2009) ‘The role of nurses in interprofessional health and social care teams’, Nursing Management, 15 (9), pp. 30-35. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 11 June 2009) National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005) The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Clinical guideline 29. London: NICE NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (2005) Best Practice Statement – November 2005: Pressure Ulcer
Prevention [online]. Available at: http://www.nhshealthquality.org/nhsqis/files/21878%20NHSQIS%20Ulcer%20BPS.pdf (Accessed 21 June 2010) Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) The Code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives, Available at: http: www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=3954 (Accessed 17 May 2008) Pedley, G. E. (2006) ‘Maintaining healthy skin’ in Redfern, S.J. & Ross, F.M. (eds) Nursing Older People (4th edn), Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone Peniket, D. & Grove, R. (2007) ‘Rehabilitation of Patients with an Acquired Brain Injury or a Degenerative Neuromuscular Disorder’ in Jester, R. (ed) Advancing Practice in Rehabilitation Nursing, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Pryor, J. & Smith, C. (2002) ‘A framework for the role of Registered Nurses in the specialty practice of rehabilitation nursing in Australia’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39 (3), pp. 249-257. EBSCOhost [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com (Accessed 21 June 2010) Reid, J. & Morrison, M. (1994) ‘Classification of pressure sore severity’, Nursing Times, 90 (20), pp. 46-50 Robinson, K. & Vaughan, B. (1992) Knowledge for Nursing Practice, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann
Roper, N., Logan, W. & Tierney, A.J. (2000) The Roper Logan Tierney Model of Nursing, Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone Rothschild, J.M., Bates, D.W. & Leape, L. (2001) ‘Thoughtful Discharge Planning For Better Outcomes’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 161 (15), pp. 1917-1918. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com (Accessed 19 June 2009) Royal College of Nursing (2001) Clinical Practice Guidelines – Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention. London: RCN Royal College of Nursing (2003) Defining Nursing, London: RCN. Available at: http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/78569/001998.pdf (Accessed 28 June 2008) Rudd, C. & Smith, J. (2002) ‘Discharge Planning’, Nursing Standard, 17 (5), pp. 33-37. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com (Accessed 19 June 2009) Smith, M. (1999) ‘Nursing and rehabilitation’ in Smith, M. (ed) Rehabilitation in Adult Nursing Practice, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Smith, S. (1996) ‘Discharge planning: the need for effective communication’, Nursing Standard, 10 (38), pp. 39-41. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com (Accessed
19 June 2009 Tracey, C.A. (2001) ‘Foreword’ in Davis, S. & O’Connor, S. (eds) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Waugh, A. & Grant, A. (2006) Ross and Wilson: Anatomy and Physiology in Health and Illness (10th Edn.) London: Churchill Livingstone Whitelock, H. (2001) ‘The team’ in Davis, S. & O’Connor, S. (eds) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Wiles, R. et al (2001) ‘Nurse-led intermediate care: an opportunity to develop enhanced roles for nurses?’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34 (6), pp. 813-821. EBSCOhost [online]. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com (Accessed 21 June 2010)
Abresch, R.T. et al (2009 ‘New Clinical End Points in Rehabilitation Medicine: Tools for Measuring Quality of Life’, American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 26 (6), pp. 483-492. OVID [online]. Available at: http://ovidsp.uk.ovid.com (Accessed 21 June 2010) Barr, D. (2007) ‘Psychological Issues in Rehabilitation’ in Jester, R. (ed) Advancing Practice in Rehabilitation Nursing, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Bonney, K. (2001) ‘Delivering care’ in Davis, S. & O’Connor, S.(eds) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Booth, S. & Jester, R. (2007) ‘The Rehabilitation Process’ in Jester, R. (ed) Advancing Practice in Rehabilitation Nursing, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Buchanan, E. (2001) ‘Older people in society: socio-political implications and the impact of health care delivery’, in Watson, N. A. & Wilkinson, C. (eds) Nursing in Primary Care: A Handbook for Students, Basingstoke: Palgrave Butler, F. (2008) ‘Essence of Care and the pressure ulcer benchmark – An evaluation’, Journal of Tissue Viability, 17, pp. 44-59. Science Direct [online]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science (Accessed 17 January 2009) Davis, S. (2001) ‘Setting goals in rehabilitation’ in Davis, S. & O’Connor, S. (eds) Rehabilitation Nursing – Foundations for Practice, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Department of Health (1993) Pressure sores: a key quality indicator. London: HSMO Franks, P.J. et al (2003) ‘Risk assessment scales poorly predict pressure ulceration’. British Medical Journal, 326 (7381) pp. 165 Goodman, C. & Redfern, S.J. (2006) ‘Intermediate and long-term care provision for older people’ in Redfern, S.J. & Ross, F.M.