Get help now

Cognitive Dissonance



  • Pages 9
  • Words 2131
  • Views 193
  • Can’t find relevant credible information

    Let our experts help you

    Get help now

    How do human beings make decisions? What triggers a person to take action at any

    given point? These are allquestions that I will attempt to answer with my theoretical

    research into Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance, as well as many of the

    other related theories. We often do not realize the psychological events that take place in

    our everyday lives. It is important to take notice of theories, such as the balance theory,

    the congruency theory and the cognitive dissonance theory so that one’s self-persuasion

    occurs knowingly. As psychologist and theorist gain a better understanding of

    Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory manipulation could occur more easily than it

    already does in today’s society. Leon Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory is very

    closely related to many of the consistency theories. The first of the major consistency

    theories, the balance theory, was proposed by Fritz Heider (1946, 1958) and was later

    revised by Theodore Newcomb (1953) (Larson, 1995). Heider and Newcomb’s theory

    was mostly looking at the interaction between two people (interpersonally) and the

    conflicts that arose between them. When two people have conflicting opinions or tension

    is felt between another person, it is more likely persuasion will occur. Because if no

    tension was felt between the two parties, or there were no conflicting opinions there

    would be no need to persuade each other. If you think about it persuasion occurs only

    because there is tension between two facts, ideas or people. Charles Larson writes in his

    book, Persuasion, Reception and Responsibility, “another approach to the consistency

    theory is congruency theory, by Charles Osgood and Percy Tennenbaum (1955)” (p.82).

    This theory suggest that we want to have balance in our lives and there is a systematic

    way to numerically figure it out. When two attitudes collide we must strive to strike a

    balance between the two attitudes. The balance varies depending on the intensity we feel

    about each attitude and our pre-disposed positions concerning the attitude. We either

    have a favorable , neutral or unfavorable opinion concerning ideas. When two attitudes

    collide we will attempt to downgrade the favorable position and upgrade the unfavorable

    position so that we feel a balance. For example, suppose someone thought of Mel Gibson

    as a good role model. Later on they come to find out Mel Gibson does not like football. If

    the person was to like both football and Mel Gibson one of three things would happen: 1)

    The individual would downgrade their opinion of Mel Gibson, or 2)downgrade football,

    or 3) downgrade both. The action taken would create psychological consistency in one’s

    mind. These theories are very interesting and have been quite researched, but none more

    so than Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitivedissonance. Leon Festinger’s theory, unlike

    the others I have described, deal with quantitative aspects, as well as qualitative. That’s

    what is so different and revolutionary about Festinger’s theory. Robert Wicklund and

    Jack Brehm (1976), in their book Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance, write,“ Most

    notably, the original statement of dissonance theory include: propositions about the

    resistance-to-change of cognitions and about the proportion of cognitions that are

    dissonant, both of which allowed powerful and innovative analyses of psychological

    situations (p.1). The term “dissonance” refers to the relation between two elements.

    When two elements do not fit together they are considered dissonant. Cognitive

    dissonance can be broken down into a number of elements. As Brehm and Cohen (1962)

    write, “A dissonant relationship exist between two cognitive elements when a person

    possesses one which follows the obverse of another that he possesses. A person

    experiences dissonance, that is, a motivational tension, when he (or she) has cognitions

    among which there are one or more dissonant relationships” (p.4).Cognitive dissonance

    can occur intrapersonally as well as betweentwo or more people. With individual

    cognitive dissonance the individual longs for consistency within their own mind. Second,

    there exist dissonance between two or more people. This occurs when two people have

    differing opinions about a particular issue.This phenomenon may have something to do

    with varying degrees of knowledge about the issue or different belief systems being

    enacted. An example of this can be seen by taking a look at the cultures of the West

    versus cultures of the East. Cultures of the East value loyalty and honor. Cultures of the

    West have different value systems that often collide with those of the East. Between two

    parties, dissonance may arise from: (1) logical inconsistency; (2) because of cultural

    mores: (3) because of a specific opinion; and (4) because of past experience. To reduce

    cognitive dissonance a person can either reduce the dissonant cognition, or its relative

    importance can be reduced (Wicklund and Brehm, 1976, p.5). Although the theory

    assumes that dissonance will be eliminated or reduced, only the thought about taking

    action to do so is a given. The means employed by any given individual to meet these

    ends is still open to speculation. Action taken depends solely on the many variables

    involved, such as ego involvement, commitment, past experiences and so on. We all react

    differently to dissonant cognitions that we are confronted with. My research attempts to

    examine the different reactions that people have had to different opinions I have declared

    which involve them heavily. The area I have chosen to look at is the habits which many

    of my close friends engage in: smoking. This is often a difficult topic to discuss because

    it is an addictive habit and very personal to many people. Full well knowing these facts, I

    attempted to delve in the minds of my friends and put many of the theories afore

    mentioned to use in the practical world. To undertake my research project I observed my

    friends in their everyday routines. I chose to attempt to persuade many of my friends to

    stop smoking. While attempting to undertake this momentous task I observed many of

    the consistency theories, especially Festinger’s theory of cognitive-dissonance. The

    research method that was used was first hand observation. You could say that I was

    undertaking a form of ethnographic research. Most of the time I had to become an active

    member of the persuasion process, or the subject of smoking possibly might not have

    The context I chose was that of my friends at home. All of the participants in the

    study did not know I was logging their behavior for later use in this research paper. Either

    myself and/or my friends would be active participants in the persuasion process. The

    basic premise of the cognitive-dissonance theory is that when two pieces of information

    do not follow each other we will experience some form of psychological tension, which

    we will attempt to reduce in some way. Often times, according to Leon Festinger, people

    attempt to reduce cognitive dissonance whenever possible (Gleitman, 1983, p.12). I

    noticed many times that my friends were very interested in the topic of quitting their

    habit, and some at times took the issue personally. When people are personally involved

    with an issue, much like the use of tobacco, they are much more attentive to the issue

    (Petty & Cacioppo, 1981, p. 847). For example, on 3/31/96 I told my three friends that I

    was concerned about how much they had been smoking recently. On the average they are

    smoking 20 cigarettes a day. One of the girls immediately retaliated with the statement

    that “ her grandmother smoked for nearly all of her life and she is in good health.” In this

    particular instance we can see the basicpremise of the consistency theories at work. The

    girl who said this statement likes me. She also enjoys smoking. When I made the

    statement that I was concerned with the levels of tobacco consumption she disregarded

    my opinion by using past experiences as evidence to back her point. She is a friend so I

    assume she somewhat values my opinion, but she upgraded her opinion of smoking and

    downgraded my opinion. She experienced some form of dissonance when I stated my

    opinion. She reduced her dissonance and thus was in balance. This is where Festinger’s

    theory of cognitive dissonance attempts to rationalize her behavior. The other consistency

    theories do not recognize the degree to which the dissonance exist. If you were to not use

    Festinger’s model, most likely you would have assumed that my opinion would have

    changed her attitude and actions. After all, I did have a contradictory opinion that did not

    follow hers, and dissonance was felt. That’s what is missing from the balance theory and

    the congruency theory: “latitudes of attitude”. This theory, unlike many others, must

    factor in the human psyche as a variable. The persuasion process did not occur in this

    case because my friends attitude towards not smoking was so anti-quitting, that it might

    be impossible to change. You cannot think of this theory in regards to machines you must

    look at it from the human perspective. Another example of observable

    cognitive-dissonance occurred on 4/7/96. The same three friends and myself were

    watching television. An anti-smoking campaign sponsored by the American Red Cross

    came on the television. Various facts about the amount of people that die every year from

    smoking and statistics about the amount of Americans with lung cancer were shared. I

    asked the girls what they thought about the information. They all agreed that it could

    happen to them, but they hoped it did not. In this case, I believe dissonance was created

    by exposure to information. The girls did not like the information and downplayed its

    validity. Not one of the girls stood up and said, “I am going to quit smoking today, I am

    really at risk of getting lung cancer!” Once again personal involvement was a given, and

    once again no action was taken. The girls feel to strong about smoking and refuse to quit.

    We must ask ourselves what a solution to this problem could be? Why is it that smokers,

    in the face of grave danger, refuse to reduce dissonance by acting out their urge to quit

    The cognitive-dissonance theory is a part of our everyday lives, whether we realize

    it or not. When we are presented with view points or opinions that differ from our own

    often times we feel dissonance. We, as human beings, are always striving to keep our

    lives in balance. Often a balance in our psyche requires that we not heed the warnings of

    things to come. As I have shown, cognitive-dissonance is utilized to avoid taking action.

    As many theorist have stated cognitive dissonance does create an internal conflict

    that causes someone to take action. In the case of smokers, I must regrettably report that

    smoking is vary rarely avoided, even with dissonance in full effect. Smokers, when

    presented with hard core data showing a decline in health due to smoking, refuse to head

    warning. This is evident with all of the “guaranteed” products to help people stop

    smoking. First there was “The Patch” and now the consumers are intrigued with

    products, such as Niccorrest Gum. Apparently no matter how much dissonance is felt and

    to what degree it is felt does not matter. Therefore, it may not be possible to get rid of

    dissonance or even to reduce it materially by changing one’s behavior or feeling.

    The research I have conducted supports my claim that it is nearly impossible to

    change the actions of smokers even though massive amounts of cognitive dissonance are

    felt. I believe that many of the people being observed reduced th overall magnitude of

    dissonance by adding new cognitive elements. No matter how much dissonance is felt,

    the smoker will always find elements that are consonant (agreeable) with the fact of

    smoking. The will power of individuals feeling as though they have to have smoking in

    their everyday lives is, often times, far to powerful for dissonance to overcome Perhaps

    research such as mine can be useful to further research into the area of dissonance and

    the use of tobacco. Much work still needs to be done in this area. We see so many people

    dying from lung cancer. Something must be done Perhaps looking at effective methods


    Bender, David, and Bruno, Leone.(Ed.) (1991). Cognitive Dissonance: Opposing
    viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, Inc.
    Wolf, Robert. (1997). Cognitive Dissonance Treatment. Philadelphia: Chelsea House
    Publishers. Baird, Robert, and Rosenbaum, Stuart. (Ed.) (1995). The Current Debate.
    New York: Prometheus Books.

    Steins, Richard. (1993). Is It Justice?. New York: Twenty-First
    Century Books.

    Jacobs, Nancy. E.D. (Ed.) (1996) Cruel And Unusual Treatment?. Texas: Information

    McCafferty, James. (1974). Cognitive Dissonance. New York. Lieber-Atherton.

    Josephson, Matthew. (1997). Discrimination and Cognitive Dissonance. New York:
    McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    McCartney, K. (1998). “Choosing life or Death.” Developmental Psychology, 20,

    Hand, D. (1998). Treatment: How Well Does it Work. Chicago: The
    University of Chicago Press.

    Rilke, Richard. Home Page. 18 Feb. 1999
    Walker, Davis, and Tristar Home Video. (1995). Living with the Helpless. [Videotape].

    Burbank CA: Tristar Home Video.


    Cognitive Dissonance. (2018, Jun 09). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper