We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

The Concept of Communism

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

* Red Star * Communism is an ideal society that is unrealistic for humans to

maintain. In this system major resources and means of production are owned

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Concept of Communism
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

by the community rather than by individuals. The society is without money,

without a state, without property and without social classes. All people would

contribute to the society according to their ability and take from the society

according to their needs. Fredrick Engel’s believed that a proletarian could only

be liberated by abolishing competition, private property, and all class

differences, and replacing it with association.

The concept was derived from

ancient sources, such as Plato’s Republic and the earliest Christian communes.

In the early 19th century, the idea of a communist society was a response to

the poor social classes that developed during the beginning of modern

capitalism. Communal societies have existed for centuries, yet they eventually

failed. Throughout history, religious groups have had the most success in

maintaining communes. The Roman Catholic Church established monasteries

all over Europe in the middle Ages.

Most of these small-scale private

experiments involved voluntary cooperation, with everyone participating in the

governing process. Philosophers Karl Marx and Fredric Engel influenced the

movement of communism greatly. In the late 1800’s the two discovered that

they had individually come to ideal opinions on the perfect society. They

collaborated their ideas in their most famous “Communist Manifesto”, as well

as many other informative pamphlets. Third World countries striving for

national independence and social change experimented with their philosophies

on economics. Fredrick Engel wrote, “The general co-operation of all members

of society for the purpose of planned exploitation of the forces of production,

the expansion of production to the point where it will satisfy the needs of all,

the abolition of a situation in which the needs of some are satisfied at the

expense of the needs of others, the complete liquidation of classes and their

conflicts, the rounded development of the capacities of all members of society

through the elimination of the present division of labor, through industrial

education, through engaging in varying activities, through the participation by all

in the enjoyments produced by all, through the combination of city and country

— these are the main consequences of the abolition of private property.” The

philosopher’s ideals were kindled by the mistreatment of the working class

throughout history. Every social system of the past, Marx argued, had been a

device by which the rich and powerful few could live by the toil and misery of

the powerless many, therefore causing class differences and conflict. Engel

and Marx believed that the capitalist system was flawed and was bound to

destroy itself. They tried to show that the more productive the system became,

the more difficult it would be to make it function: The more goods it

accumulated, the less use it would have for these goods; the more people it

trained, the less it could utilize their talents. Capitalism, in short, would

eventually choke on its own wealth. Poverty rapidly spread through civilized

countries during the industrial revolution in the late 18th century. It was

precipitated by the discovery of the steam engine, mechanical loom, and other

various mechanical devices. Only “big capitalists” could afford the expensive

machines, which transformed the entire mode of production. Former workers

were replaced by machines, which were more productive, along with cheaper

labor. Industrial product (brought about by machine labor) prices decreased,

completely destroying the old system of hand labor. Within no time the

bourgeoisie (big capitalists) increased profits and the former workers remained

with nothing. The former workers, proletarians were then forced to work

minimum wage for the bourgeoisie. They only provided the lower class enough

money to survive, so they would not be able to rise above their class. So as the

old saying goes, “the rich got richer and the poor only got poorer”. Many

countries were revolutionized by Europe’s mechanical industry production.

Countries such as India and China were complete strangers to historical

development, until they were violently forced out of their isolation. They bought

cheaper commodities from the English and allowed their own manufacturing

workers to wither away. Due to the one world market, civilized countries have

repercussions in third world countries. By abolishing private property,

competition would become obsolete. Karl Marx did not think that competition

and individual management of industry could be separated, so his solution was

to destroy both of the problems with one stone. He wanted to limit private

property through progressively increasing property taxes (basically taxing the

bourgeoisie). By removing competition, greediness would be eliminated.

“Greediness is a consequence of capitalism and is merely a learned quality”,

explains Kominf. If all humans were treated equally, there would be no need to

compete with one another. In the ideal society, the state would provide

education for all children. The children would be trained for a variety of

occupations. Thus entering the work force, they would be prepared for a

variety of jobs. Workers would rotate occupations in response to the needs of

society. No longer would they be bound or exploited to their occupation. This

would remove class differences, such as the one-sided character that is

transfixed upon our current society. The variety of classes would soon

disappear because there would no longer be a division of labor. Within a

communistic society commodities are traded, opposed to using money.

Commodities value is based upon the amount of labor time that was necessary

to produce the product. However, this could result in a situation in which a lazy

worker taking their time about making a commodity makes a commodity worth

much more than the commodity made by a hard working efficient worker. If

this were the case then employers would be sacking their diligent workers

while telling the rest to go as slow as they can. Instead of Right-Wing

politicians lambasting the poor for being lazy they would be lambasting them for

being too hard working. This is not, however, what determines the value of a

commodity. What determines the value of a commodity is the labor time

socially necessary for its production. Shortages, inequalities, and coercive

government have persisted in countries that call themselves ‘communist’. The

followers of Marx that have come into power in nations have lacked some

preconditions that Marx and Engel considered essential. Russia was one of the

first countries to experiment with their own revised version of communism. In

the early years its enemies within the country challenged the government’s very

existence repeatedly. The country strived to transform their backward country

into a leading industrial nation and first rate military power. However this task

required harsh discipline imposed only by an unrelenting dictatorship. Which

controlled all of citizens activities. The resulting system of total control has

been labeled totalitarianism. Totalitarianism by no means carried out Marx and

Engel visions of utopia. The country’s cultural and intellectual life remained

under the control of the ruling party. Eventually in the early 1980’s, the USSR

had become the world’s second-ranking industrial power. Its armed might and

industrial potential were backed by important scientific advances and by a

generally high level of technical education. However, their living conditions

were low in comparison to that of the Western countries. The success was not

maintained for more than a decade. In 1991 the political struggle led to the

collapse of the Soviet Communist Party. In order for communism to succeed, it

must be world wide. This is because of our one world market that exists in

modern day. Countries in the world depend on one another for economical

growth. Although with this dependency, the countries rise and fall with one

another’s economy. The internet is spreading the word of communism. Groups

represented throughout the world are preparing for a future revolution.

Unfortunately they are not afraid of brutally taking lives to get what they want.

It is expected that one day the large number of the working class will join

together and revolt against their higher class. If communism were to be world

wide, they would be able to completely abolish competition. Within removing

competition, people’s trait of greediness would soon wither.

Cite this The Concept of Communism

The Concept of Communism. (2018, Aug 22). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/communsim-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page