Deadly Consequence of Gun Control - Gun control Essay Example
Gun control has been on the forefronts of debate since the 1960’s when there were some high profile shootings - Deadly Consequence of Gun Control introduction. The increase of gun violence since the 1980’s has just increased the argument over who should be allowed to own and carry weapons. The Second Amendment is the biggest stumbling block in this debate because people interpreted it differently. The one side argues that it states that we have the right to bear arms, but the other side says that it doesn’t pertain to us anymore in the modern era.
Politicians love to use the idea that removing legal guns will drastically reduce suicides, assassinations, gang-violence, school shootings, accidental child deaths, and general murders. They don’t consider the fact that someone that wants to kill themselves will do it anyway they can, or a college kid trying to tear up his school will just blow it up if he cannot find a gun. Criminals vary rarely use registered guns to commit crimes, they use illegally acquired weapons. Gun control only protects the criminals and the image of the government’s control over the people.
essay sample on "Deadly Consequence of Gun Control"? We will write a cheap essay sample on "Deadly Consequence of Gun Control" specifically for you for only $12.90/page
More Gun control Essay Topics.
The controversial movement to disarm people has infringed their natural right to self-preservation(self-defense), which takes away their true freedom. The Founding Fathers believed that freedom and no gun control goes hand in hand, which is why they wrote the Second Amendment. “To disarm the people… was the best and most effectual way to enslave them” (Henry, 1788) Patrick Henry’s quote sums up gun control. So, why after all these years have we forgotten his words? History has proven Henry’s words to be true over and over, but the nation keeps disregarding it.
Americans need to act urgently on this matter, because if no action is taken on gun control, we will become another ‘Hitler’s’ Germany or ‘Stalin’s’ Russia, without the ability to defend ourselves, slaves of a corrupt tyrant or government. The worst outcome will be when innocent civilians lose their ability to self-defense against the evil criminals that besieges out cities every day. The State and Federal government needs to work together to remove gun control so that the fear will be placed back into the criminals and the power of freedom back into the innocent people’s hands.
History of Gun Control Gun control has been around for a very long time, even before there were guns. The Roman’s and Greek’s used a similar idea when they disarmed their populations of all weapons to ensure no uprising. The British implemented gun control on their colonies across the globe. The Germans with Adolf Hitler made sure his own people and conquered countries were disarmed, giving him complete control. “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms.
History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. ” (Hitler, 1942) Hitler’s quote here is a good example of a recent use of gun control. America is currently also implementing gun control in the Middle East, by removing weapons from the civilians and giving the weapons to the Police and Army forces they are trying to put in power. The US government believes they are doing the right thing, but at the same time the people of Iraq and Afghanistan are being denied their natural right to self-defense.
The British tried to do the same to the Americans, which in part sparked a revolt and a victory for America’s freedom from oppression. The Founding Fathers realized that the right to bear arms was God-given, and no government should have the ability to take it away. Unfortunately, the USA is doing the same to its own people and those of the countries they occupy. The controversial gun control laws that have been implemented over the years have been more about containing gun violence than global control.
The Second Amendment was the first step to this constant battle between conservative(anti-gun control) and liberal(pro-gun control) groups. In 1927 the first act by Congress to instill gun control started when they passed a law to forbid the mailing of weapons. The National Firearms Act of 1938 by President Roosevelt was the first big gun control law of the modern era. This law stated that “ all gun sales and gun manufactures’ were slapped with a $200 tax on each firearm sold,” which made it almost impossible for anyone to afford it. Gettings, 2012) The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 was the first law passed that required every firearm to be registered and the owners to be licensed. The Assassinations of John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy in 1960’s inspired the Gun Control Act of 1968. This law increased the difficulty to obtain any weapons. The purchasers had to provide more details, no more sales over state lines, and people that were convicted of crimes were not allowed to buy guns anymore. In 1972 the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms(ATF) was formed, which regulates the firearm laws we have today.
Since the formation of the ATF gun control laws such as Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act(1986), Crime Control Act(1990), Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act(1994), Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act(1994), Brady Handgun Act Goes Into Effect(1998), and Gun Bill Requires Trigger Locks(1999) have been passed. (Gettings, 2012) There have been minor State laws passed to either counter act or increase these passed bills. The battle against these laws has been huge, with lots of supporters, none bigger than the NRA. The Nation Rifle Association was the first anti-gun control group founded.
The NRA was founded in 1871 by Col. Williams and General Wingate to promote rifle shooting for experimental basis. (Gettings, 2012) The NRA has become the leading anti-gun control activist group, fighting for freedom of gun use across the country. The group has been heavily involved in fighting for states like Illinois, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland and New Jersey to remove bans on weapons. In 2008 the handgun ban in Washington D. C. was dismissed because of the NRA’s relentless effort to support the people’s right to bear arms. The most recent legal battle they are fighting is the Shepard v.
Madigan case in Illinois, where a federal district court ruled that the Second Amendment does not give the right to carry firearms outside of the home for personal protection. (NRA, 2012) They need to be supported by more people in the fight against gun control. Let us take a look at some statistics about the results of gun control across the world. Cause and Effects of Gun Control Australia banned just about every gun there is after the mass murders by an insane man in 1996. A year after the ban, homicides increased by 6. 2 percent, assaults rose by 9. percent and armed robberies went up by 44 percent. (Chennel, 1997) Still think gun control is good? The U. K. enforced strong laws regarding weapons in 1997.
There were 4500 crimes involving a firearm in 1997. In 2008 the number of crimes involving a gun had risen to 10,000 a year. (UK Home Office, 2008) Still think gun control is good? Switzerland with the highest in-home gun rate and little to no gun-control in Europe, has the lowest crime rate. There are around 2 million privately owned guns in Switzerland, with a population of 6 million. There is an only average of 68 gun related deaths a year. UNICRI, 2012) Still think gun control is good? The USA isn’t quite as strict on gun laws as Australia or England, but not nearly as relaxed as Switzerland. America is so big that it will probably be an injustice to compare it to these other countries as a whole, especially since every state pretty much has its own rules too.
A very good example of two different states statistics, are Washing D. C. and Virginia. D. C. ’s murder rate in the last 25 years since its gun ban has increased 51 percent while the national rate has decreased by 36 percent. (Gun Owners Foundation, 2004) Politicians blame D. C. un ban failure on Virginia; they say people go over there and bring it back to D. C. Virginia have very lax gun laws and a much lower murder rate. Washington D. C. has 46. 4 per 100,000 murders a year, while Virginia only has 6. 1 per 100,000 a year. (Gun Owners Foundation, 2004)This example shows the complete ineffectiveness of gun control. The law abiding citizens of D. C. don’t own guns and are defenseless against the criminals who have illegally acquired firearms elsewhere. This also shows the problem with having every state making separate rules instead of having one Federal rule across the country.
States such as , New Jersey, California, and Illinios also have a high crime rate to strict gun-control ratio. Change of Gun Control Policy The gun control policies we have today cause nothing but problems. The only solution is not to write more gun control laws, but to remove it all together. For example, The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1994 requires a five-day waiting period on the purchasing of a gun, because of background checks and paperwork. (Gettings, 2012) This law was passed to protect us from ‘bad guys’ getting guns right? Bonnie Elmasri inquired about getting a gun to protect herself from a husband who had repeatedly threatened to kill her. She was told there was a 48 hour waiting period to buy a handgun.
But unfortunately, Bonnie was never able to pick up a gun. She and her two sons were killed the next day by an abusive husband of whom the police were well aware of. ” (Gun Owners Foundation, 2004) Bonnie’s story shows how the Brady law cost three innocent lives. Rayna Ross was able to buy a handgun in a non-waiting state and two days later shot an attacker in self-defense. Gun Owners Foundation, 2004) Two very good examples of why gun control needs to be eliminated. One point that pro-gun control activist argue is accidental gun deaths among kids. The average accidental death rate for kids between the age 0 and 14 every year is 4,983, in which only 86 is from firearms. (Gun Owners Foundation, 2004) Five other causes are above firearms and they all average above one hundred. The question now is, do we ban children driving in motor-vehicles, because 2,591 of the 4,983 accidental deaths among children are from car accidents? The simple answer is no, that would be ridiculous.
Twice as many kids get killed every year from playing football than from guns. So why then do we support gun control, which leads to the complete ban of firearms at some point like Washington D. C.? People are ignorant to the fact that guns don’t kill people, but people kill people. School shootings have made gun control supporters even more stubborn to the truth. The Virginia Tech University shooting is a good example of their short-sightedness. A year before the shooting, guns were banned from campus, then on April 16, 2007 Cho Seung-Hui killed 43 students and faculty.
The school police and Cho were the only ones armed, making him unstoppable. If the students and teachers were armed like a year before, Cho would have been dead long before he killed all those people. Gun-Control activist obviously lobbied for stronger gun laws right after this incident. How ignorant do people have to be before an important lesson is learned? Gun restricted laws only enable the criminals and the insane. “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms.. disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one. ” (Jefferson, 1764) The wise Mr. Jefferson hit the nail on the head. There should be no gun control policy. The policies that are in place to prevent gun violence have cost millions of dollars to implement and only increased gun violence across the country. Countries like Australia and England have shown the futility of gun control, yet Americans still support it.
The country needs to come together to accomplish this feet of removing gun control. Unfortunately, the States and the Federal government have to work together to get the job done. The ability of each state to make its own laws above the required Federal laws makes it very difficult. This policy of no gun-control is not likely to ever be completely implemented because of the vast size of the US, but hopefully this proposal can at least relax current gun laws. States like Virginia have proven that little to no gun laws create a safer environment and with some hope; other States will follow their example.
Closing Statement Peter Venetoklis said that “Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire! ‘ in a crowded theater. ” (Venetoklis) Why can’t the government and gun-control activists just listen to the common sense from this quote? A soldier on the battle field is always armed with his weapon. The government would never send out the military unarmed into battle. So why is the government risking the safety of all the citizen’s by disarming the people of the USA?
The ability to defend ourselves should not be in the hands of the people, not the government. We cannot rely on the police for our sole protection; by the time they arrive the victim is already dead. Prevention is better than a cure. This gun-control virus needs to be stopped before it gets out of control and kill us all. There is a war going on inside American borders and it is time we fight for our freedom by defeating our enemy, ‘gun-control’ before we face its deadly consequence. A. E. Van Vogt said that” the right to buy weapons is the right to be free. ” (Vogt, 1942)