We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?

Evolution versus creation has been a debate lasting

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

decades upon decades in the United States and around the

world. The mock trial held during class, however, was not

to prove one view as right and the other wrong. Rather,

the focus of the trial, from the view of the prosecution,

was simply to prove that creation should not be taught as a

The prosecution and the defense were each allowed

four witnesses. A fifth grade science teacher, a preacher,

a world religions professor, and Dawkins were called to the

stand by the prosecution. My part in the trial was that of

the preacher. Our argument was simple; the preacher believed

creation to be true, of course, but did not see how creation

could be taught as a science. Instead, the view of creation

should be a part of a religion or philosophy class.

According to the scientific method, a true

scientific hypothesis or theory about anything must be able

to be proven false.

“There is a very important

characteristic of a scientific theory or hypothesis, which

differentiates it from, for example, an act of faith: it

must be ‘falsifiable’. This means that there must be some

experiment or possible discovery that could prove the

theory untrue” (Wudka 2). If there is no way to disprove

something, it can not be classified as a science. In

addition, a true science must be reproducible. According to

Behe, origin of life scientists have created life using the

same conditions that would have existed on the early earth.

It is impossible, however, to duplicate creation.

In addition to the argument of testability, creation

should not be taught as a science because it goes against the

rulings of the federal government. In 1987, in a case known

as Edwards versus Aguillard, the U.S. Supreme Court held

unconstitutional Louisiana’s ‘Creationism Act.’ The Creationism

Act stated that evolution could only be taught when it was

accompanied by the teaching of creation. “The Court found

that, by advancing the religious belief that a supernatural

being created humankind, which is embraced by the term creation

science, the act impermissibly endorses religion” (Court

Decisions). As a result, the Court decided that a comprehensive

science education could not be received unless evolution, without

creation, existed in the class syllabus.

Long ago, the government decided that a separation of

church and state should exist. The prosecution reasoned that

since “everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities,

for there is no authority except that which God has established.

The authorities that exist have been established by God” (Romans 13:1).

As Christians, we should accept what the authorities tell us, since that

is what God commanded. Therefore, creation should not be taught as a

Creation, however, should not be completely written

out of a child’s education. “All Scripture is God-breathed

and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and

training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). A religion or

philosophy class should insert the teachings of creation

into their curriculum. If this method is adopted, then the

views of creation would not be forced upon students.

Forcing religion on people rarely benefits anyone. “For

the time will come when men will not put up with sound

doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will

gather around them a great number of teachers to say what

their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears

away from the truth and turn aside to myths” (2 Timothy

According to the basic point of the scientific

method, creation is not a science because it can not be

proved false. Not only is creation not testable, but

according to the United States Supreme Court, creation

should be kept out of the science class. The Bible tells

us to obey figures of authority; therefore, the argument

seems null and void. Without question, creation’s place is

in a religion or philosophy classroom.

“Background: Six Significant Court Decisions Regarding Evolution/Creation Issues.” http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/creation/voices/legal/bkgrd.

Behe, Michael J. Darwin’s Black Box.

Romans 13:1. “Bible Gateway.” http://bible.gospelcom.net/

2 Timothy 4:2-4. “Bible Gateway.” http://bible.gospelcom.net/

Wudka, Jose. “What is the ‘scientific method’?” http://rom.pomona.edu/scien_method/node6.html#SECTION02121000000000000000

Cite this The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?

The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?. (2018, Jun 22). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/evolution-vs-creation-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page