Get help now

The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?

  • Pages 3
  • Words 705
  • Views 446
  • dovnload



  • Pages 3
  • Words 705
  • Views 446
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?
    Evolution versus creation has been a debate lasting

    decades upon decades in the United States and around the

    world. The mock trial held during class, however, was not

    to prove one view as right and the other wrong. Rather,

    the focus of the trial, from the view of the prosecution,

    was simply to prove that creation should not be taught as a

    The prosecution and the defense were each allowed

    four witnesses. A fifth grade science teacher, a preacher,

    a world religions professor, and Dawkins were called to the

    stand by the prosecution. My part in the trial was that of

    the preacher. Our argument was simple; the preacher believed

    creation to be true, of course, but did not see how creation

    could be taught as a science. Instead, the view of creation

    should be a part of a religion or philosophy class.

    According to the scientific method, a true

    scientific hypothesis or theory about anything must be able

    to be proven false. “There is a very important

    characteristic of a scientific theory or hypothesis, which

    differentiates it from, for example, an act of faith: it

    must be ‘falsifiable’. This means that there must be some

    experiment or possible discovery that could prove the

    theory untrue” (Wudka 2). If there is no way to disprove

    something, it can not be classified as a science. In

    addition, a true science must be reproducible. According to

    Behe, origin of life scientists have created life using the

    same conditions that would have existed on the early earth.

    It is impossible, however, to duplicate creation.

    In addition to the argument of testability, creation

    should not be taught as a science because it goes against the

    rulings of the federal government. In 1987, in a case known

    as Edwards versus Aguillard, the U.S. Supreme Court held

    unconstitutional Louisiana’s ‘Creationism Act.’ The Creationism

    Act stated that evolution could only be taught when it was

    accompanied by the teaching of creation. “The Court found

    that, by advancing the religious belief that a supernatural

    being created humankind, which is embraced by the term creation

    science, the act impermissibly endorses religion” (Court

    Decisions). As a result, the Court decided that a comprehensive

    science education could not be received unless evolution, without

    creation, existed in the class syllabus.

    Long ago, the government decided that a separation of

    church and state should exist. The prosecution reasoned that

    since “everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities,

    for there is no authority except that which God has established.

    The authorities that exist have been established by God” (Romans 13:1).

    As Christians, we should accept what the authorities tell us, since that

    is what God commanded. Therefore, creation should not be taught as a

    Creation, however, should not be completely written

    out of a child’s education. “All Scripture is God-breathed

    and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and

    training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). A religion or

    philosophy class should insert the teachings of creation

    into their curriculum. If this method is adopted, then the

    views of creation would not be forced upon students.

    Forcing religion on people rarely benefits anyone. “For

    the time will come when men will not put up with sound

    doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will

    gather around them a great number of teachers to say what

    their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears

    away from the truth and turn aside to myths” (2 Timothy

    According to the basic point of the scientific

    method, creation is not a science because it can not be

    proved false. Not only is creation not testable, but

    according to the United States Supreme Court, creation

    should be kept out of the science class. The Bible tells

    us to obey figures of authority; therefore, the argument

    seems null and void. Without question, creation’s place is

    in a religion or philosophy classroom.

    “Background: Six Significant Court Decisions Regarding Evolution/Creation Issues.”

    Behe, Michael J. Darwin’s Black Box.

    Romans 13:1. “Bible Gateway.”

    2 Timothy 4:2-4. “Bible Gateway.”

    Wudka, Jose. “What is the ‘scientific method’?”

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School?. (2018, Jun 22). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy