How My View on Gay Marriage Changed Essay
“How My View on Gay Marriage Changed” At the time, gay marriage is a steaming hot topic of discussion in the United States. The right of marriage between man and man or woman and woman is one of the most controversial debates in the history of America. On several locations around the globe, fore an example in europe, gay marriage is a legal act. But should homosexuals have the same rights as “normal” people when it comes to marriage? A lot of different reasons why gays should not be able to get married, have occurred in this discussion.
Also people around the States walk the streets, demonstrating pro and con due to the proposal of a law letting gays get married. One of the reasons why homosexuals should not have the right to get married, according to american law and point of view is, that if it is possible by society, a child has the right to be taken care of by the parents who gave them life.
David Blankenhorn argued for this in a californian court referring to a piece of law by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. I opposed gay marriage believing that children have the right, insofar as society makes it possible, to know and to be cared for by the two parents who brought them into this world. I didn’t just dream up this notion: the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which came into force in 1990, guarantees children this right. Marriage is how society recognizes and protects this right. Marriage is the planet’s only institution whose core purpose is to unite the biological, social and legal components of parenthood into one lasting bond.
Marriage says to a child: The man and the woman whose sexual union made you will also be there to love and raise you. In this sense, marriage is a gift that society bestows on its children. “ – David Blankenhorn, “How My View on Gay Marriage Changed”. The New York Times website, June 23, 2012. (www. nytimes. com) David Blankenhorn also argues that marriage package solution which binds the two partners in multiple ways. Biological, social and legal. These are the bonds of parenthood which David Blankenhorn means are melted together by arriage. Sure enough, all those aspects come in handy when you talk about the practical about marriage, but only if children are included in the discussion. Why would people get married otherwise? To seal og refresh the bond between lovers? To get financial benefits? Is it simply prestigious? The correct answer must be up to each couple to find. Giving that marriage is not a way to get a child, why should gay people get married? But then again why would non homosexuals get married?
In the United States, the wedding of a couple is a major cultural and religious event. We know that the christian church and belief does not applaud homosexuality, so why should the gays have access to marriage? Of course they should have access to marriage. But maybe not in the church. A religious marriage, must at all time be for the religious people. Meaning that one christian would never host a islamic wedding and the other way around. There are certain rules in each religion which must be followed.
Like laws in the society, there are rules in the churches. You would not question that stealing in a shop is wrong or/and illegal, so why question the rules of a “private” club, which the churches actually are. Sure, anyone can attend any church, but the rules have been made, and that forces the attendants to follow the rules set by the church. Because homosexuality is a sin, gays and lesbians cannot be married in the holy bond with gods blessing, according to the bible.
But some highly respected religious authorities have now started doubting the fairness of the gays exclusion from holy marriage. “Cardinal Timothy M Dolan of New York, in television interviews, says Roman Catholic Church could be more welcoming of gay men and lesbians, even if it opposes same-sex marriage; Dolan stresses church’s teaching that marriage is between one man and one woman should not be reduced to attack on gay people. ” – http://topics. nytimes. com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/same_sex_marriage/index. html
So if Cardinal Timothy M Dolan is too controversial to the main religious man and woman, maybe secular weddings could be the way to go. City hall og Las Vegas are both places that hands out wadding certificates. Maybe the gays could go there to get married. “America is a Secular State” – http://www. arguingequality. org/chapter8. htm Processing over 300 wedding ceremonies each and every day, Las Vegas is one concentrated center of marriages. In Las Vegas many of the weddings are phony, and you may have them made official by authorities, but the Vegas example, is just an example.
The conclusion must be that homosexuals should, according to the law, have the exact same rights of marring as everybody else. But up to each church it should be their choice about letting gays marry in their chapel. The city hall and other secular locations should be available for gays to get married in/on. “After receiving your Marriage License, your ceremony must be performed by a marriage official. A Marriage License is good for one year. ” – http://www. clarkcountynv. gov/depts/recorder/pages/marriage. aspx