Americans have to be informed bout these negative outcomes Beamer will bring upon us. There are many factors contributing to the Affordable Care Act, or Beamer, followed by different opposing viewpoints. Alexandra Booze, author of Facts of Beamer: Inside Look at the Pros and Cons of the New Health Law, states some important facts that perhaps we may have not been informed about. She reports the effects the CA will have on small businesses, the future of the health care workforce, and the American publics understanding on this new and important bill.
Booze says that the CA will lead mall companies to cut back workers’ hours so that they do not have to provide healthcare for them. Booze mentions that, ” Three of the nation’s largest unions sent a letter to House and Senate Democratic leadership last week claiming that Beamer would ‘shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40-hour workweek that is the backbone of the American middle class”.
Those who agree upon this new health care law, is agreeing to destroy what has made America a successful nation Nominal 2 in the world.
She then indicates that because the bill has been held back until two ears from now, businesses will not have to cut workers’ hours until then. Another factor Booze brings up, are the causes that Beamer will have on the future of the health care workforce. According to a study made by the Association of American Medical Colleges, the CA will cause the lack of doctors in 2020 (Booze). She mentions that the pressures of Beamer will only make doctors and physicians want to retire early.
On the bright side though, Booze asserts that Beamer will improve many existing health care centers and even build new ones. The author says that, “These rejects are estimated to serve almost 4 million people. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services projects that the community health center provision of the law will create nearly 19,000 new Jobs, including positions staffing new facilities” (Booze). The last element Booze points out is the understanding that the American public has on this new bill.
She claims that according to the Kaiser Family Foundation Health Poll, many Americans have little to no knowledge of this new law. She finishes by stating that the American public is divided by different opposing viewpoints on Beamer and those who are undecided or have no opinion whatsoever. Booze’s arguments on the CA were thorough and well organized. She supports her claims with facts and statistics which makes the article much more credible to the reader.
The author arranges the article by stating a question and then answering with two paragraphs: one presents the positive outcomes of Beamer while the other presents the negative. Although Booze does not take a stance in this issue she is able to demonstrate enough information, both the good and the bad on Beamer, to help the reader gain some understanding of this new law. At Nominal 3 times, some of her arguments contradicted each other, but regardless of that the author was well organized and informed.
Unlike Booze, the author of The Costs of Beamer, Ross Death sates most of the negative repercussions the CA will have on our nation. He starts off by informing the reader of a new estimate the C. B. O has predicted based on the new health care bill. Death claims that over the next 10 years, Beamer will only go beyond its original budget making other projects unsuccessful. Many projects will suffer by either being cut down or killed off due to the Coca’s outrageous spending and this is definitely no good for our nation’s fiscal matters (Death).
Like Booze, Death points out that pressures given by Beamer will lead companies to lay off or cut workers’ hours because it will save them a various amount of money. Even big companies, such as AT&T, Verizon, Caterpillar, and Deere are following the same procedures as small companies; they are trying to Justify the reason of laying off or cutting down workers’ hours (Death). The author claims that the CA will turn business into ruins as well as the whole nation’s workforce. Death identifies and adds on to the consequences the CA will have upon businesses.
He argues that because companies are trying to look for inexpensive ways to not cover their workers, this will only hurt our nation’s budget deficit. Companies are driven to this because it is much more simple and inexpensive to pay to not cover their workers rather than to follow the CA standards. Finally, the author supports his claim by saying that, “If 50% of people covered by company plans get impede, federal health care costs will rise by $160 billion a year in 2016, in addition to the $93 billion in subsidies already forecast by the COB” (Death).
Nominal 4 The New York Times writer, Ross Death, recognizes the consequences Beamer will have on our country. He is straightforward with his claims and uses some statistics and facts to support them. Death does a great Job persuading his audience on the negative effects this bill will take upon us. Even though he is able to advise the reader of such consequences, I believe his article could have been much ore stronger and reliable if he argued against the so positive impacts on Beamer.
Overall, Death did an outstanding Job appealing to those who are against the CA and even persuades those who are doubtful. After reading and analyzing those two strong articles, I strongly believe that Beamer is no good for our country. The CA claims to be helpful for our future by helping create new Jobs and making health care conditions better for our country, but to what expense? Just as both Death and Booze stated, the CA will most likely o over its original budget which will only add on to our nation’s economic debt.
Not only will it increase our debt, but it will affect future projects, businesses and most important of all, our workforce. School budget cuts will worsen which will lead our future into disaster. Students will be discouraged and affected greatly towards their success which is OUR success. Our nation’s success. We cannot afford the loss of new leaders, the lack of work hours, and an increase in our debt. All in all, as good as it sounds to have an “affordable” health care program, the consequences to this are ere risky and high.
Cite this Hunger of Memory Precis
Hunger of Memory Precis. (2018, Feb 05). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/hunger-of-memory-precis/