Idols of the Tribe The idol of the Tribe is a look into nature of humanity in general: common sense tendencies to rely upon little assumptions without confirming them as established truths and beliefs in which humans have a tendency to support their personal beliefs. In some cases wishful thinking leads people to believe what one wishes to believe, a tendency that is difficult to understand. Human beings have over generalized and to jump to conclusions on the basis of first impressions. These are ultimate causes that describe how people assume what is really the truth. We have the tendency to let emotions rule reason. Humans have difficulty in separating emotions from observations and understanding that give us false impressions of the truth based on our feelings at the time. For example, I have been cut off by someone in traffic; I lost it, chased after the offending driver of vehicle, and cut them off, stop the vehicle and yell at the person, I clearly have let emotion cloud my better judgment and understanding. Our senses are dull and are easily deceived. We like to discern or even impose more order in life than is actually needed.
This arises perhaps from affection we begin to give to ideas we have found and carried with us for some time; we become attached to them and collect evidence that supports them while throwing out that which contradicts them. Of course, this will lead us to false conclusions if we have accidentally embraced a false “truth. ” Science faces this problem all the time: in the attempts to find scientific evidence for curing diseases. Scientists often tend to find data that fits whatever conclusions they were expecting, whether or not it was the most accurate analysis of data.
This is problematic because this is considered to be “soft” data, not truly factual. Education falls into the large influence on an individual’s perception of the world around them. Unfortunately, the false realities of the educators, books, etc. can get passed on to the student, thus coloring their clear understanding. For example, if a particular history teacher had a dislike of say communism, the student might well get false impressions of how that system works and its implications for society. Books work similarly to education, and perhaps are in fact a somewhat less intense version of education.
Again, the points of view in books will tend to distort an understanding and thus a person can be greatly influenced by their reading material. If a person were to read a book portraying a particular subject (say, religion in schools) in a negative manner, the person’s understanding and reaction to the issue could be completely clouded. Religion can often sometimes be another way of getting distorted versions of the bible. Growing up I was raised by mother who was Jehovah Witness, I studied with them for 10 years of my life I felt their teaching were so far off of could be the truth of the bible.
It was then at 16 years old that I finally saw that were so many religions, so many different teaching, and versions of what maybe the bible really should have meant. When it comes to religion we are all idols of the tribe in which we base our decisions on impressions of churches and their followers. There are people a person admires or idolizes; all people have their own idols and false understandings, and if a person holds another in too high esteem, there is the potential for them to pick up their “herd’s” false perceptions. Which means you might admire someone for some reason, but find yourself picking up a bad habit of theirs.
I don’t want to be offensive, but Christians use symbols of the cross. We use the cross or depictions of Christ or of angels or of religious events. To someone who is not Christian, it might appear that we worship the objects rather than using the objects merely as a connection or tool. I think that our perception of religious symbols outside our own religion puts a different meaning into the symbol than those who use it. A person’s experiences can also distort their understanding, especially if they attempt to draw too many conclusions from them.
For example, if I were robbed by a certain race or type of person, you might even subconsciously associate that type of person with the experience and come to the conclusion that that type of person is bad. This today could be called racial profiling. This is the sort of thing the media puts out there and causes other people to believe a certain race could be bad. This would be giving a false perception of what this race may truly be. Being that I am in law enforcement I tend to see this often with my fellow officers. Honestly it is hard not to when I work in LA County.
LA County has had the reputation of being an area full of gang members and drug dealers. I have to look at everyone that I may come across while patrolling as a possible threat. Upon the solid foundation of trained minds can build toward universal knowing, which is the end of the work. Knowledge alone can preserve a perfect human life. Bacon in no way discounted the spiritual content in the world. Knowledge might arise from inspiration and the internal enlightment of the consciousness, but this illumination is not knowledge until, through experimentation, the truth is physically established.