& A ; Jacksonian Democracy Essay, Research Paper
More Essay Examples on
Jeffersonian and Jacksonian Democracy are the same in merely about every respect - Jeffersonian Essay introduction. Their positions and ends as presidents are the same. Both are in favour of the common adult male and experience that it is the common people who should hold the biggest influence on authorities, non the affluent blue bloods. They besides support provinces rights and experience that the federal authorities should non acquire involved with the provinces personal businesss. Both work forces? s actions clearly show that the common adult male does non include minorities. Both Jackson? s and Jefferson? s actions and words are really similar and back up the same beliefs.
Thomas Jefferson was a strong protagonist and spokesman for the common adult male and self-determination. He strongly believed that the intent of American authorities is to look after and back up the common involvements of the people. He was against anything that he felt would ache the common adult male such as the Bank of the U.S. and large authorities. Jefferson believed the Bank was aching the common adult male and became a detrimental monopoly. ? It would get down up all the delegated powers [ of the provinces ] , and cut down the whole to one power & # 8230 ; ? -Jefferson mentioning to the Bank. He was strongly against large authorities and felt it would suppress the common adult male. ? I am non a friend of a really energetic authorities & # 8230 ; it places the governors so more at their easiness, at the disbursal of the people. ? Jefferson was besides a strong protagonist of the Bill of Rights, which protected the rights of the people. ? A measure of rights is what the people are entitled to & # 8230 ; ? He felt the Bill of Rights would clearly province and protect people? s rights, ? freedom of faith, freedom of the imperativeness, protection against standing ground forcess, limitation of monopolies, the ageless and ceaseless force of the habeas corpus Torahs, and test by jury & # 8230 ; . ? It was based on Jefferson & # 8217 ; s suggestions that Madison proposed a Bill of Rights. Jefferson did everything he could to assist the common adult male.
Andrew Jackson was doubtless a adult male of the people. He was the first president to be chosen by the people and his background was non that of a typical president. He was non born into a rich household. Jackson? s favored the general populace instead than the wealthy. His election shifted the balance of power from the affluent East Coast, to husbandmans and little business people in the West. Jackson vetoed more measures than all old presidents did in an effort to assist the common adult male. Jackson besides created the spoils system. This fundamentally was a manner for Jackson to acquire rid of the current people in authorities, and replace them with people that had supported him over the old ages. While this may look incorrect, it really brought a balance in the authorities and served to assist the common adult male. Jackson strongly opposed the Bank of the U.S. He felt the bank was a? monster establishment? that would make nil but do the affluent wealthier at the disbursal of the on the job category. He did everything he could to acquire rid of the Bank. To carry through this, Jackson decided to take authorities money from the bank to pay disbursals and set in future authorities net incomes in selected province Bankss. He besides refused to allow the bank renew their charter. The Bank of the U.S. disappeared when its charter expired in 1836. Jackson was really similar to Jefferson, and did everything he could to assist the common adult male.
Thomas Jefferson felt passionately that province rights are really of import and that the federal authorities should merely step in with foreign personal businesss. Jefferson felt that provinces should regulate their ain personal businesss for the most portion. ? If of all time this huge state is brought under a individual authorities, it will be one of the most extended corruptness & # 8230 ; Our state is excessively big to hold all it? s personal businesss directed by a individual government. ? Jefferson was really clear with what he felt the function of the federal authorities was. ? & # 8230 ; States are independent as to everything within themselves, and united as to everything esteeming foreign states. Let the general authorities be reduced to foreign concerns merely, and allow our personal businesss be disentangled from those of all other states, except as to commerce, which the merchandisers will pull off the better, the more they are left free to pull off themselves. ? When the Alien and Sedition Acts passed in 1798, Jefferson ( Vice President at the clip ) strongly opposed them and felt they violated the rights of the provinces. The Alien and Sedition Acts was a
ctually a series of 4 Acts of the Apostless. The first 3 Acts of the Apostless fundamentally were focused on aliens ( foreigners ) and allowed the president to collar and behave any foreigner he considered unsafe, the Sedition Act made it a condemnable discourtesy to publish or print false, malicious, or disgraceful statements directed against the U.S. authorities, the president, or Congress. Jefferson felt this was go againsting the provinces First Amendment right of free address and imperativeness. To antagonize these Act Jefferson drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, which stated that federal powers are limited to what is stated in the fundamental law, and that the provinces have the right to make up one’s mind if an act is constitutional and if they have to follow it. Jefferson greatly supported and protected the provinces rights.
Jackson in many ways supported provinces rights. In his first Inaugural message the first thing he said referred to the protection of provinces rights. ? The Federal Constitution must be obeyed, states rights preserved, our national debt must be paid, direct revenue enhancements and loans avoided, and the Federal Union preserved. These are the objects I have in position, and irrespective of all effects, will transport into effect. ? Although Jackson was non as passionate about province rights as Jefferson was, he still supported the provinces. Excluding the Nullification Crisis ( South Carolina fundamentally ignores duty and threatens to go forth the Union ) , Jackson was a protagonist of the provinces right to take what it wishes to make. Besides the Nullification Crisis was more an issue of North and South conflict instead than provinces rights. Jackson truly wanted to go forth the inquiry of internal betterments to the provinces. Jackson? s ideal function of the authorities was indistinguishable to Jefferson? s. Both wanted cardinal authorities to play a minimum function in the provinces personal businesss.
Both Jefferson and Jackson shared about indistinguishable positions on minorities. Although they may of said and hoped for equality for minorities, actions speak louder than words. No affair how they genuinely felt about minorities, Blacks and Native Americans were clearly non included in the? common adult male? they both sought out to assist. They both were, or at least in their actions showed marks of racism. Their intervention of Blacks, particularly Native Americans were really unjust and racialist. Jefferson every bit good as Jackson owned many slaves. Both work forces supported the thought of traveling Native Americans from their place, taking their lands and traveling them to a different portion of the state. After the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson had suggested that piece of lands of land in this huge new district could be given to native peoples if they agreed to give up their lands in the eastern portion of the state. Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forced eastern Indians to travel West of the Mississippi. He besides supported Georgia in its attempt to rob the Cherokee state of its land. Jackson claimed that he had? no power to oppose the exercising of sovereignty of any province over all who may be within its limits. ? The Cherokee appealed to the Supreme Court, and in Worcester v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled against Georgia. Marshall stated that the federal authorities had regulation over Native American lands and Georgia could non take the Cherokee lands. To this Jackson replied, ? John Marshall has made his determination. Now let him implement it. ? The determination was ignored. In 1837 and 1838 the U.S. Army gathered about 15,000 Cherokee and forced them to travel. During this journey? Trail of Tears? about one out of every four Cherokee died.
The U.S. even charged the Cherokee six million dollars for the forced remotion. Jackson did nil to halt this. Both Jefferson and Jackson should be considered racialists. They shared the same beliefs as the bulk of people did in respects to minorities. In a manner their positions of minorities show how they supported the common people.
As you could see from Jefferson? s and Jackson? s words and actions, their positions are about indistinguishable. Their sentiment of the Bank of the U.S. and how it will ache the common adult male is about precisely the same. They both support provinces rights, and agree on the function of the Federal Government. Their positions and their actions are besides the same concerning Blacks and Native Americans. With all the similarities in their policies, actions, and ends as president, you can see how Jeffersonian and Jacksonian Democracy are the same.