New Sources of Energy: Oil Fields in the U.S.
The article I have chosen is about the oil fields in the United States and the predictions of the International Energy Agency. In this article it states how the U. S. could become the leader seller and producer of oil in the next five years. The International Energy Agency predicted that the U. S. would be the world’s leading oil producer by about 2017 and will become a net oil exporter by 2030. Fields in Kansas are producing oil at a fast rate. The U. S. , with the upcoming increased production of natural gas and oil, will become the top leader in these fields compared to the Middle East and Russia.
Russia is the top leader in production of natural gas, and the Middle East is the leading producer in natural oil. The sudden change has been due to the new forms of drilling in the United States. With the energy policies that our implemented today and these predictions mean the U. S. could be self-sufficient in energy providers for themselves. This could mean cleaner energy for the country and a change in global markets. This will in turn remove us from our dependency on fossil fuels.
Need essay sample on "New Sources of Energy: Oil Fields in the U.S." ? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page
Hopefully by 2050 the United States will show the rest of the world that natural gas can provide the boom in the economy and will be the major supplier for fuel. Scientists say that in order to reduce emissions and prevent global warming, the world should use less than one third of fossil fuels for energy. These new predictions will be good for America and for the rest of the world. The Functionalist perspective would agree that this increase in economic gain for the United States would be beneficial for maintaining stability in society.
When the country of an economy that affects everyone globally is in a positive gain, it in return improves the world economy. People with a Functionalist perspective have a sociological approach that emphasizes the way in which parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability. Therefore the increase in revenue for a country is always essential for maintaining stability for a society. This is also a new form of technology due to new sources and forms of energy to fuel the world.
Increases in technology always results in better stability for a society. This new prediction for the United States will conclude and a great increase in jobs which will raise the per capita income for its citizens. Larger income for citizens means more people to pay taxes which pays for needed services and government that keeps a society functioning. This change for America and the world will be very beneficial for functionalism because it will maintain and further the stability of all societies.
Interactionist sociological approach generalizes about every day forms of social interaction in order to explain society as a whole. The effect these new sources of energy and the positive increase for the economy would have on small families would be exponential. It would provide a great increase in wealth for these families which could raise the middle class higher in income. These traditional forms of having a job and being able to afford a car and house will further the American dream.
New sources of jobs and higher increases in income will maintain the small group interaction in America to its original or usual state. The interaction between small groups will mostly stay the same. This article that states the new prediction of increase of oil and natural gas will also cause a greater divide possibly in classes. The rich will get richer in the U. S. and the poor will be even father from achieving middle class. With the increase of incomes the divide between middle class and the poor will have a great effect on the classism warfare that takes place around the world.
The conflict perspective is a sociological approach that assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of tensions between groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation. Therefore the poor would lose power with new waves of resources, in this case new sources of energy. These new emerging companies could result in exploitations of workers knowing how many desperately need jobs with the high rate of unemployment in the United States. The conflict perspectives will most likely be negative from these changes.
The Feminist view is the sociological approach the views inequity in gender as central to all behavior and organization. These new emerging companies could result in more male political leaders rather than female. Even with the increase in recent female political leader in the house and senate with new companies typically run by men could fund male politicians to run against female if they aren’t in favor of what’s best for the companies. Since these new sources of energy are clean fuels women will most likely be in favor of these businesses especially democratic politicians.
This article stating these predictions will most likely be good for the feminist viewers around the world. These future results both can be good and bad for each sociological perspective. The increase in new jobs, cleaner fuel, higher incomes, and a better economy, can show that these new changes will be mainly beneficial for most. The world in turn will benefit and it will maintain stability for society around the world just like functionalism. Therefore the functionalist perspective would provide the most accurate view for this article and issue.