Ehrenreich’s book explains and describes the condition of the working poor in the United States. To write this book the author who is a well-known journalist at the New York Times decides to experience being a low-wage worker for a few months. She gives up her middle class life to become and live as a working poor. This was not to be a social experiment that was to recreate a poverty social scenario, but it was , in fact, to see if she could maintain a lifestyle working low wage paying jobs the way 4 million women were about to experience it.
As an individual coming out of wealthy life, I think that it would be very hard for her to prove her point. I believe what Ehrenreich is trying to prove is that those certain workers wages should be raised and companies are able to do it. First off, employees that work these low-wage jobs donate all of their time, energy, and personal life to these jobs that consume all of their energy. “In every job, in every place I lived, the work absorbed all of my energy and much of my intellect. ” (Ehrenreich p 9).
This quote illustrates how difficult low-wage work really is and that it shouldn’t be looked down upon. Secondly, the money that they do earn is barely enough to support one person, imagine trying to support a whole family on $7. 25 an hour… Not going to happen! Now a days, necessities in life cost entirely too much for these low-wage workers to afford, and everybody has to spend money on themselves some time or another but their extra money is either going to doctor appointments or anything else unexpected life throws at you. What about benefits?
Oh yeah, these workers don’t get any benefits at all. That is why having Welfare reforms can really be useful to these workers and also can provide more jobs. However, many people who are on welfare have become so used to it, and instead of using the money and aid to stay alive while they look for a better job, they are sitting at home waiting by the mailbox for the next check to come in. In the meantime, many people are having more kids, because- more kids more welfare money. These women relish the thought of getting free money in the mail-for doing absolutely nothing.
Many argue that welfare is necessary for many families, and that it must not be cut. Some argue that it is giving starving families the boost they need to make it one more year. This is only partially true. Yes, we need welfare, but we also need to limit the amount of time a family can stay on it. By letting families stay on welfare for extended periods of time, we are only creating a lazy, dependent culture. People figure that the welfare check will come in the mail, so where's the motivation for going out and getting a job?
There isn't one! Looking at the state of low wage workers in America today, many are struggling to make ends meet and provide basic needs to themselves and their families. Legions of people work every day in America caring for children and the elderly, ensuring the security of public and commercial buildings, preparing and serving food in schools, restaurants and nursing homes, ringing up customer purchases, cleaning office buildings, hotels and homes, beautifying gardens, parks and lawns and more. These jobs, while essential, pay little.
Close to 60% of all jobs created since the bottom of the recession--and most of the jobs projected to be created in the next decade--are low-wage occupations like these. Workers often rely on food stamps, the earned income tax credit and other means-tested programs often threatened to be cut not because they don't work hard enough but because their earnings are pitifully low. And while these workers strive to save, it is plainly impossible for them to save enough to finance their retirement, or manage the ever-escalating cost of college for themselves or their children (The Atlantic Newspaper).http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/america-needs-a-raise-the-case-for-a-higher-minimum-wage/266977/