The book Liberty and Tyranny by Mark R. Levin is introduced by the author himself. Right off the bat one can assume that Levin is a strict conservative, and the subtitle of the book is very accurate. He addresses the fact that the Constitution is too easily altered and that the statism is a rising issue in America. He discusses Roosevelt and the New Deal, as well as the GM bailout approved by former president George W. Bush, and mentions that “Republicans are clueless. Levin goes straight to the point on how he believes the government can be fixed to a better functioning society by putting forth his ideas on taxation, environmental issues, Supreme Court rulings, education, foreign issues, faith, the state and even the Constitution itself. Right off the bat I could tell Levin was not going to beat around the bush or show any signs of giving up to the other side, and being a Republican myself, I was urged to read on to the following chapters, especially The Constitution.
On Liberty and Tyranny is the opening chapter to the book, and Levin automatically opens up again about the issues of a civil society versus a statist utopia. He believes in conservatism, which he describes as a way of understanding life, society and government. The founding fathers are mentioned and their beliefs are incorporated into the ways of conservationism and a civil society. Levin describes the duties and the identities of a civil society, which are basically the individual depending solely on himself and not the others around him.
Roosevelt is again mentioned with his New Deal idea; however Levin introduces it as a statist way of doing things, which in turn leads into a vast description of ways to notice a statist or ones government forming. Overall, this chapter is trying to express how conservatist, as well as our founding fathers, believed in liberties for all of mankind, and conservatism is “the antidote to tyranny. ” While I found the book as a whole very interesting, there were certain chapters that stood out to me more, due to the fact that they were major issues concerning the most recent presidential election.
On Faith and Founding was Levin’s chapter dedicated to establishing the difference between the conservatism and statism aspects of religion. While it is obvious that our founding fathers were all of some religious background, they were all noted to be of some variety. When the Declaration of Independence was signed by the individual state representatives, they had signed that all men are “endowed by their Creator. Even though some of the men were Baptist, while others tended to be either Catholic, Anglican and Presbyterian, they all signed under the name of God in some form or another to ensure that citizens of these United States were able to believe in the faith they chose regardless of where they lived or whom they were related to. However, Levin goes on to discuss that a Statist may believe in a God or some form of a supernatural, but want to tie it into the government and the way it functions.
Ultimately, by this point in the book one can tell that a statist form of government is very unifying and dependent. Levin continues his beliefs with notes on the Constitution. He opens by agreeing that the Republican’s vastly agree with the Constitution and that it’s writings that were set forth a few hundred years ago are believed to still be relevant in today’s America. However, he mentions that ultimately, what is a contract that is easily able to be revised? No, the original document was not perfect manuscript but that’s ultimately what the amendment process was established for.
However, when a second “Bill of Rights” was mentioned, Levin ensured to put up a red flag by writing, “This is tyranny’s disguise. These are not rights. They are the Statist’s false promises of utopianism... ” While the amendment process is completely necessary due to the changing of eras, there needs to be a limit set forth to ensure that a Statist cannot ruin the original manuscript with additional “rights. ” On the Welfare State is the next chapter I found to be oddly amusing, in a sense.
The opening line caught me off guard for a minute, as Levin states, “If the Statist were to devise a scheme whereby a grandparent would be stealing future earnings form his own grandchild, would the grandparent consent to such immoral behavior? Yet entitlement programs tend to be intergenerational swindles that threaten the well-being of future generations whit massive financial obligations incurred from benefits received by today’s generation. The Holy Grail of such programs is Social Security, followed closely by Medicare and Medicaid. To only lightly touch on the subject, I believe this is the most obvious form of Statism that is occurring in the United States at this current time. While it seems rude to come out and say the oldest living generation is stealing from my current one, is there honestly any other way to put it? An eighteen year old can be working two jobs just to put them through community college, yet half of their earnings are dumped into a big pot to divide among retired individuals that have already used the monies they deposited.
A huge congratulation to the Federal Government on working wonders to help make the people happy- oh wait. Levin hit close to home with me on this opening paragraph, and I found the fact that this can be considered Statism to be quite comical, none the less. While all the above paragraphs are not everything Levin touched base on, they’re the strong points that I believe can make the most compelling arguments on the message that the novel is intended to convey.
In all, I believe Levin did a fantastic job in creating a conservatist’s platform for office without throwing punches in the liberal or independent party’s directions. While the book is obviously strongly opinionated, it’s very detailed and highly resourceful in learning the ways of how our government functions. I would recommend this book to anyone searching for answers during this era of high political tensions. However, if you’re a strong supporter of Franklin Roosevelt, I would again highly recommend another political novel.