We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Poverty Point Culture

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Poverty Point sites in Louisiana and western Mississippi exhibit the first major residential settlements and monumental

earthworks in the United States. Although the Poverty Point culture is not well understood in terms of social organization, it was

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Poverty Point Culture
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

involved in the transportation of nonlocal raw materials (for example, shell, stone, and copper) from throughout the eastern

United States into the lower Mississippi River Valley to selected sites where the materials were worked into finished products

and then traded. While specific information on Poverty Point subsistence, trade mechanisms, and other cultural aspects is still

speculative, the sites nevertheless exhibit specific material culture, such as baked clay objects, magnetite plummets, steatite

bowls, red-jasper lapidary work, fiber-tempered pottery, and microlithic stone tools.

By around 500 B.C., the Poverty Point culture was replaced by the Tchula/Tchefuncte Early Woodland culture, which existed

in western Tennessee, Louisiana, southern Arkansas, western Mississippi, and coastal Alabama. The sites of this lower

Mississippi River Valley culture were small village settlements.

Subsistence continued to consist of intensive collecting of wild

plants and animals, as with the preceding Poverty Point culture, but for the first time quantities of pottery were produced. There

appears to be a de-emphasis on long-distance trade and manufacture of lithic artwork noted in the earlier Poverty Point culture.

The Tchula/Tchefuncte Early Woodland culture appears to have coexisted with some Middle Woodland cultures in the lower

The pottery of this period appears to have been relatively crude and undecorated. The pottery is

distinctive in being thick, poorly fired and covered on the inside and outside by cord marking. This

cord marking was probably the result of construction techniques in which clay was formed around a

basket or bag before firing. Not all Early Woodland sites had pottery and some researchers suggest

that it was used only for part of the year, perhaps during the processing of acorns or other nuts for

During this time period burials became even more elaborate with increased inclusion of status

artifacts. Some of these exotic artifacts show clear evidence of influence and contact with even more

elaborate and complex cultural groups to the south. In these areas, clearly complex and stratified

societies, probably with full time chiefs and priests, had developed and were interacting with many

other widely distributed groups across North America. Exchange of exotic desirable goods such as

copper, silver, obsidian, sea shells and exotic, often colourful, cherts seems to have been the main

goal of this “interaction sphere” but, undoubtedly, the exchange of ideas was also important in

stimulating further development. Whether foods or furs for clothing was also exchanged is unknown

The main characteristic, besides elaboration of burial practices, that distinguished the Early and Middle Woodland from Late

Archaic traditions, was the gradual intensification of local and interregional exchange of exotic materials. For many years

archeologists have regarded as “classic” those Middle Woodland sites with elaborate ceremonial earthworks that contained the

burial mound graves of elite individuals buried with exotic mortuary gifts obtained through an extensive trade network covering

most of the eastern United States. Because of the similarity of earthworks and burial goods found at widely scattered sites in

the Southeast and the area north of the Ohio River, it was assumed that a cultural continuity-sometimes referred to as the

Hopewellian Interaction Sphere-existed throughout much of the eastern United States.

At least some nonorganic trade items can

be identified from the study of the burial mounds of the Middle Woodland. To this trade, the Middle Woodland territories of

the Southeast appear to have provided mica, quartz crystals, and chlorite from the Carolinas, and a variety of marine shells, as

well as shark and alligator teeth, from the Florida Gulf Coast. In exchange, the Middle Woodland clans of the Southeast

received galena from Missouri, flint from Illinois, grizzly bear teeth, obsidian and chalcedony from the Rockies, and copper

from the Great Lakes. Standardization of style for the finished artifacts used in this trade may be attributed to a relatively small

number of clan leaders controlling the exchange system and developing their own symbolic artifact language of what trade

goods constituted a reciprocal exchange between clans.

The Middle Woodland (200 – 300 B.C. to A.D. 700 – 900) period is distinguished from the Early

Woodland only in few, relatively minor, aspects. These relate to some aspects of the chipped lithic

tool inventory (i.e. changes in projectile point types) and the addition of decoration of increasing

elaboration to the pottery. Pottery is found on a greater percentage of sites so may have become

more widely used in the seasonal round. There is some evidence of different cultural groups but

these differences appear mostly as style differences in pottery and may be more a result of the

limited state of knowledge for this time period. These different traditions will be described in greater

During the Middle Woodland period, burial

ceremonialism appears to have reached its

peak. It was at this time that the most exotic

items were included in burials and most of

the known burial mounds were constructed.

These include the Serpent Mound at Rice

Lake, a burial mound which was shaped

like a giant snake, and the mounds at Rainy

River. Much of the elaboration in mortuary

ceremonialism is attributed to contact with

the Hopewellian people in the Ohio Valley.

This influence appears to end around A.D.

250 and after this time burial ceremonialism

Around A.D. 500, the archeological record reveals a sharp decline in the construction of Middle Woodland burial mounds in

the Hopewellian core area of the Ohio River drainage. The decline in the construction of burial mounds is accompanied by

disruption of the long-distance trade in exotic materials and interregional art styles.

Traditionally, archeologists have viewed the Late Woodland (ca. A.D. 500 – 1000) as a time of cultural poverty. Late

Woodland settlements, with the exception of sites along the Florida Gulf Coast, tended to be small when compared with

Middle Woodland sites. Based on our present-day perspective, few outstanding works of prehistoric art or architecture can be

attributed to this time period. Careful analysis, however, shows that, throughout the Southeast, the Late Woodland was a very

dynamic period. Bow-and-arrow technology, allowing for increased hunting efficiency, became widespread. New varieties of

maize, beans, and squash were introduced or gained economic importance at this time, which greatly supplemented existing

native seed and root plants. Finally, although settlement size was small, there was a marked increase in the numbers of Late

Woodland sites over Middle Woodland sites, indicating a population increase. These factors tend to give a view of the Late

Woodland period as an expansive period, not one of a cultural collapse.

The reasons for possible cultural degradations at the end of the Middle Woodland and the subsequent emergence of the Late

Woodland are poorly understood. There are several possible explanations. The first is that populations increased beyond the

point of carrying capacity of the land, and, as the trade system broke down, clans resorted to raiding rather than trading with

other territories to acquire important resources. A second possibility is that a rapid replacement of the Late Archaic spear and

atlatl with the newer bow-and-arrow technology quickly decimated the large game animals, interrupting the hunting component

of food procurement and resulting in settlements breaking down into smaller units to subsist on local resources. This ended long

distance trade and the need for elite social units. A third possible reason is that colder climate conditions about A.D. 400 might

have affected yields of gathered foods, such as nuts or starchy seeds, thereby disrupting the trade networks.

A fourth and possibly interrelated reason is that intensified horticulture became so successful that increased agricultural

production may have reduced variation in food resource availability between differing areas. This reliance on horticulture,

involving only a few types of plants, would have carried with it a risk where variations in rainfall or climate could cause famine

Cite this Poverty Point Culture

Poverty Point Culture. (2018, Sep 26). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/poverty-point-culture/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page