Due to different perspectives, Hosseini’s book, “The Kite Runner”, has been interpreted differently. Some claim that Hosseini is targeting the American readers, enlightening them about Afghanistan, some say that he is concerned about the effects of the war in Afghanistan and some presume that he’s just writing a story with no motives whatsoever. In my opinion, all 3 interpretations are equally acceptable. It only depends on what the reader wants to think of Hosseini, as an intentional writer, a journalist, or a storyteller.
When “The Kite Runner” came out, it caught a lot of attention because of the 9-11 incident. As an American citizen, writing a book about Afghanistan in American English could be a coincidence, or Hosseini’s goal was to target the Americans. In the book, there are a lot of American spellings such as “color”, “traveling” and words like “hollering”. The book also has allusions to American movies like “Rio Bravo” with John Wayne and “The Magnificent Seven” with Charles Bronson.
Even Baba’s car was American.
This shows that Amir’s family, in general, the rich people in Afghanistan, had a lot of American influence, portraying the similarity between Afghans and Americans. By targeting the readers in USA, Hosseini displays the normal life of Afghans to them, and especially for the people who stereotype Afghans as terrorists. On the other hand, Hosseini pops in facts of Afghanistan in the novel from time to time. These paragraph or phrases are structured like a journalist writing a news article.
As a result of being an American citizen at quite a young age, Hosseini may be concerned and feels the need to study or write about the effects and history of the war in Afghanistan. Due to caste discrimination of Hazaras because they are Shi’a muslims, Hosseini puts Hassan and Ali the Hazaras as servants to the Pashtuns: Amir and Baba. Certain minor characters in the novel even contribute to ridicule them. The climax of the story, when Assef butt-rapes Hassan is also an extended metaphor to the domination of Pashtuns over Hazaras.
Other than that, the author also puts in the names of leaders and their time of reign like “In 1933, the year Baba was born and the year Zahir Shah began his forty-year reign of Afghanistan…”, “The official end, would come first in April 1978 with the communist coup d’etat, and then in December 1979, when Russian tanks would roll into the…” and “In his absence, his cousin Daoud Khan had ended the king’s forty-year reign with a bloodless coup” on July 17, 1973. Readers can tell when Hosseini is writing about
Afghanistan’s history as his writing style changes from descriptive to straightforward and brief like a newspaper article. Last but not least, the simplest argument. Hosseini is just writing a fiction story, including facts to make it seem realistic. This is obvious to readers when Hosseini writes about exact details like what Ali served for dinner, “potatoes and curried cauliflower over rice” and Hassan’s “brown corduroy pants thrown on a heap of eroded bricks”. Amir was only a child of 12 years and can barely know what the material of the pants was.
Therefore, the author is writing as a storyteller. Hosseini adds in past continuous tenses as well to immerse the reader into the past together with him reliving it. In conclusion, I agree with all 3 interpretations, as they are all possible. Hosseini wrote a fiction about his hometown, and adding in the facts to make it seem more lifelike. It is also to show Americans that it’s not all wars and blood in Afghanistan. People there live a normal life as they do in the US. As a result, these are some of the purposes of Hosseini writing “The Kite Runner”.
Cite this Purpose of the Kite Runner
Purpose of the Kite Runner. (2016, Nov 27). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/purpose-of-the-kite-runner/