The prologue and scenes following that were exact to the lines in the play. Unlike the other version, some lines from the characters were changed and different to that of the original text. The costumes are also suited with the time period of the play and with the setting. The pacing and camera shots taken in the 1986 version Of Romeo and Juliet is better than the 1 ass’s version. In the 1986 version, the pacing throughout the prologue, opening scene and famous balcony scene is understandable in contrast to the 1996 version.
The scenes re relatively slow in accordance to the scenes who ICC makes the scenes more understandable. In the balcony scene, the actors who played Romeo and Juliet are graceful in the way the scene is taken. It depicts what readers imagine when reading the play. The scene isn’t rushed but not so slow that it bores the viewers. The opening scene has great camera shots so that the viewers get a good understanding of what is happening.
When the fight breaks out, there are multiple aerial shots that give the viewers a wide look at the scene and a wide look at what is happening.
In comparison to the other version, along with the fighting scene, the 1996 version has quick movements and the camera shots move from one person to another. This selective viewing, doesn’t allow the viewer to see the surrounding and the sudden movements, make it difficult to keep up with what is going on which is where pacing comes into play. Music and the choice of actors is what makes Ziegfeld’s version better than Learner’s version of Romeo and Juliet. The music in the 1968 version was smooth and even calming at some points throughout the film.
During the prologue, the music was soothing and calm which fits the scene because the prologue explains what is going to happen through the movie. In the 1996 version, the music was upbeat and fast which isn’t what the play coincided with. One quality the play included was romance which is usually associated with smooth/romantic music, and the 1986 version supports that quality. The choice of actors was another component that enhanced Franco Ziegfeld’s version better than Bag Learner’s version. The actors were suited perfectly for what viewers imagined the characters to kook like.
On the other hand, Learner’s version had many actors that didn’t match up with the characters. During the time period of the play, people were Caucasian and so in Learner’s version Mercuric in black. The color isn’t a racial thing but rather a disturbance in the reality of how the play should actually go in choice of actors. The other version accommodates this and other actors suit the characters which furthermore supports why the 1986 version of Romeo and Juliet is better than Bag Learner’s version.
Some people might prefer the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet better cause of the fact that it is more modernized and that version attracts the viewer better. The clothing worn in Learner’s version of Romeo and Juliet is similar to what current users would wear which is more modernized. This detail allows the viewers to be able to relate to that, which therefore catches and attracts the viewer better than the sass’s version of Romeo and Juliet Although the clothing is one detail that may make the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet seem better, that style of clothing doesn’t express the time period of the play.
Cite this Comparison of Two Romeo And Juliet Versions
Comparison of Two Romeo And Juliet Versions. (2018, Mar 25). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/romeo-and-juliet-91/