Get help now

Sacco and Vanzetti

  • Pages 6
  • Words 1393
  • Views 126
  • dovnload



  • Pages 6
  • Words 1393
  • Views 126
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    The case of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was not about the justice system blaming

    them for murdering two people, but rather how the justice system murdered two people and got

    away with it. Throughout the trial the public withdrew from their anti-radical thinking to more of

    a sympathetic understanding of another human being, no matter their beliefs. World-wide interest

    was quickly turned to the ill-fated Sacco and Vanzetti. While the judge and prosecution had

    already delivered the verdict in their minds, Sacco and Vanzetti proclaimed and defended their

    Before the crime ever took place Sacco worked at the Milford Shoe Factory as an edge

    trimmer. Sacco was a hard worker; who supported his wife, Rosa, and his son, Dante. Vanzetti

    worked as a fish peddler. In May 1917, both left their jos to go to Mexico and avoid the draft.

    Both Sacco and Vanzetti had the same views which were considered radical at the time; therefore

    they did not advertise them. Understandably, they feared for their safety as well as their friends

    and families who shared the same ideals (Feuerlicht 11). Although some had suspected that they

    were of radical ideology, it was not publicaly announced. Having avoided the draft, Sacco and

    Vanzetti returned from Mexico. Upon their return, organizations and federal agents started to

    On April 15, 1920 there was a payroll robbery of the Slater & Morrill Shoe Company.

    Two men were killed and $15,773. 59 missing. These crimes happened in South Braintree

    Massachusetts and became known as the Braintree Crimes. There were two people that attacked

    and killed the payroll employees, then grabbed the money and took off in the escape car. The

    escape car was described as a black Buick with other partners inside. Eyewitnesses claimed that

    two of the criminals “looked Italian” (Altman 70). Crimes like this had been common at the time

    and had only sparked local interest (D’Attilio).

    It was not until Sacco and Vanzetti were in the courtroom facing charges of murder and

    robbery, that the Braintree Crimes would become a publicized affair. Sacco and Vanzetti were

    arrested on May 5, 1920 for the murders and robberies that took place three weeks earlier. They

    both were anarchistic, atheist, draft dodgers, immigrants, and neither could speak English well

    (Fabulous 26). This undoubtedly made them an easy target. When questioned they both lied

    creating a “consciousness of guilt” in the eyes of the prosecutors and judge (D’Attilio). Another

    aspect that did not help Sacco and Vanzetti were their alibis. Although both had an alibi, their

    witnesses often could not remember much about the day in question other than they defiantly saw

    the defendants. Sacco’s alibi rested on his repeated attempt to get passports to Italy to see his

    family. Vanzetti was allegedly selling fish and visiting some friends (Montgomery 142-155,

    131-141). Percy Katzmann, the prosecutor, had given both a difficult time with the questioning.

    He used their lack of English skills against them and often twisted their words around. Although

    Moore, the defendant’s lawyer would object to this, Judge Thayer would allow it to continue and

    Judge Thayer was unprofessional by making rude comments during and out of court. He

    would refer to Sacco and Vanzetti as “Dagoes” never referring to them as Italians (Feuerlight

    202). He would also talk about the case outside of court and brag to others saying “Did you see

    what I did with those anarchistic bastards the other day? I guess that will hold them for a while.”

    (Feuerlight 306). Not only was his behavior questionable, but the fact that he was the judge of the

    case was questionable, since he had just sentenced Vanzetti for another case a few weeks prior.

    Fortunately for Sacco and Vanzetti, their lawyer was dedicated and fought for their

    freedom. Moore raised awareness to the trial worldwide. Supporters protested for Sacco and

    Vanzetti’s freedom. After six weeks of trial Sacco and Vanzetti were found guilty of murder and

    robbery. Though they were found guilty, their lawyer still fought for appeals and continued to

    spend money on propaganda. Since the anarchist movement had been paying for the trial and all

    the spending that Moore was doing, they fired him. Moore was replaced in 1924 by William

    Thompson made appeal after appeal, and more and more evidence proving Sacco and

    Vanzetti’s innocence surfaced as he fought for an appeal. On November 16, 1925 a man in sitting

    in Dedham Jail was given the financial report of the Sacco and Vanzetti case to read, he read it

    and wrote a note addressed to the “News Editor Boston American Paper. Boston, Mass.” Two

    days later he wrote a similar note to Sacco, who was in the same jail, and had the Deputy Jail

    Master, Oliver Curtis, to deliver it to him. After a few minutes Curtis had passed Sacco’s jail cell

    and saw him crying in the corner with the note in his hands (Feuerlight 126-127). The note read :

    “I hear by confess to being in the South Braintree crime and Sacco and Vanzetti was not said in

    crime” – Celestino Madeiros (Russell 279). Thompson was eager to get the confession into a

    formal document, but Madeiros needed to wait to see the outcome of a trial. Once it was over he

    agreed to sign a confession although his story changed from the first one he told Thompson

    The evidence in Sacco and Vanzetti’s favor was counts of perjury by prosecution

    witnesses, illegal activities by police and federal authorities, confession to the Braintree Crimes,

    and evidence that a notorious gang called the Morelli Gang and Judge Thayer ruled and rejected

    on a motion accusing himself of judicial prejudice (D’Attillio).

    Upset and tired of the constant let downs the case produced, many supporters held

    protest. A supporter of Sacco and Vanzetti, Felix Frankfurter who was a Harvard Law Professor,

    wrote an article in protest describing how the trial was a mockery of the American court system

    Apparently pressure from people like Frankfurter, and other protesters world wide made

    the Governor of Massachusetts second guess his decision to execute Sacco and Vanzetti on

    August, 23 1927. So he appointed an advisory committee nick-named the “Lowell Committee”

    because the most prominent member was A. Lawrence Lowell, president of Harvard University.

    The final decision of the committee was that executive clemency was not warranted (D’Attillio).

    On August 23, 1927 at 12:11:12 Nicola Sacco entered the execution room, weak from a

    thirty day fast which he was forced to end only a few days earlier, he walked to the chair without

    assistance. Once he sat down in Italian he said “Long live anarchy,” he then switched to speaking

    in English quickly “Farewell, my wife and child and all my friends.” His final words were

    “Farewell Mia madder.” Nicola Sacco was pronounced dead at 12:19:02. Vanzetti entered the

    execution room at 12:20:38. Upon entering he shook hands with the three guards and Warden

    Henry, whom he thanked “for all you have done for me.” He then sat in the chair and looked at

    the witnesses and said “I wish to tell you that I am innocent. I never committed any crime, but

    sometimes sin. I thank you for everything you have done for me. I am innocent of all crime, not

    only thins one, but of all. I am an innocent man” he ended with saying, “I wish to forgive some

    people for what they are now doing to me.” Bartolomeo Vanzetti was pronounced dead at

    Sacco and Vanzetti were innocent men, who were martyred. They were not killed because

    they were honestly thought to be guilty murder or robbery, but because they would not conform

    to the ideals of the time. There was to much evidence against their guilt for a conclusion leading

    to it. Although there is nothing that the American legal system can do to make-up for such a

    horrible mistake, but it can learn from it. Hopefully the very same constitution it defends can be

    Altman, Linda Jacobs. The Decade that Roared America during Prohibition. Brookfield:
    Twenty-First Century Books, 1997.

    D’Attillio, Robert. The Case Of Sacco and Vanzetti. 29.Aug.1999.9.Sept.2000.

    Feuerlight, Roberta Strauss.Justice Crucified the story of Sacco and Vanzetti. New York:
    McGraw Book Company.1997.

    Montgomery, Robert.Sacco-Vanzetti the Murder and the Myth.New York:The

    Russell, Francis.The Tragedy in Dedham.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company

    This Fabulous Century 1920-1930. Alexandra: Time-Life Books, 1969.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Sacco and Vanzetti. (2018, Oct 07). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy