The Era of Good Feelings - Nationalism Essay Example
During the Era of Good Feelings, the pro of the absence of party competition in the federal government; they don’t worry about trying to satisfy the goals of more than one party - The Era of Good Feelings introduction. Government could not worry about politics and concentrate on building the new nation economically and militarily. There is less concern with the President worrying about re-election. They have political stability and good administration. Also, we are talking about con of the absence of party competition in the federal government; there is no minor party to keep the majority party under control.
Minorities (political) would not have a voice in the government. They have not much interest in national or state elections. There is indifference to politics. Although, I am discussing about compare and contrast the concepts of nationalism and patriotism. Nationalism is considered by respect of the nation, a feeling of national superiority, an uncritical acceptance of national, state, and political authorities, a control of unsure attitudes toward the nation, a preference to define one’s own group by criteria of descent, race, or cultural affiliation, and derogation of groups not considered to be part of the nation.
essay sample on "The Era of Good Feelings"? We will write a cheap essay sample on "The Era of Good Feelings" specifically for you for only $12.90/page
More Nationalism Essay Topics.
Nationalism and patriotism both show the relationship of an individual towards his or her nation. The two are often confused and usually believed to mean the same thing. However, there is a huge difference between nationalism and patriotism. Nationalism means to give more importance to accord by way of a cultural background, including language and heritage. Patriotism refers to the love for a nation, with more importance on values and beliefs.
When talking about nationalism and patriotism, one cannot keep away from the famous quotation by George Orwell, who said that nationalism is the worst enemy of peace. According to him, nationalism is a feeling that one’s country is greater to another in all respects, while patriotism is only a feeling of appreciation for a way of life. This concept shows that patriotism is passive by nature, and nationalism can be a little aggressive. Patriotism is based on affection and nationalism is rooted in rivalry and antipathy.
One can say that nationalism is aggressive by nature and patriotism is based on peace. Most nationalists believe that their country is better than any other, but patriots believe that their country is one of the best and can be improved in many ways. Patriots tend to believe in friendly relations with other countries while some nationalists don’t. In patriotism, people from all over the world are considered equal but nationalism implies that only the people belonging to one’s own country should be considered one’s equal.
A patriotic person tends to tolerate criticism and tries to learn something new from it, but a nationalist cannot tolerate any criticism and considers it an offense. Nationalism makes one to think of one’s country’s qualities and not its shortcomings. Nationalism can also make one despicable of the virtues of other nations. Patriotism, on the other hand, affects to value responsibilities rather than just valuing loyalty towards one’s own country. Nationalism makes one try to find explanation for mistakes made in the past, while patriotism enables people to understand both the shortcomings and improvements made.