We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

The Literary Style Of TS Eliot

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

The Literary Style Of T.S. Eliot Essay, Research Paper

The Literary Style of T.S. Eliot

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Literary Style Of TS Eliot
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

A author? s reading of the universe purely influences his literary public presentation. T.S. Eliot literary manner was extremely melancholic because the epoch that he was populating in was filled with anguish and depression. His plant of literature vary from his usage of traditional dramatic construction to fabulous method. Eliot & # 8217 ; s perceptual experience of life as nil more than a battle is expressed in his literary plants by his usage of realistic subjects such as depression, human isolation and through his spiritual imagination.

For illustration, The Love Song of J.Alfred Prufrock is a dramatic soliloquy about love. On the other manus, The Waste Land and Ash Wednesday is more fabulous and explains deeper into faith and God. Eliot created his composing manner based on his ain personal experiences ; therefore his verse form all show unbelievable accomplishment.

Eliot & # 8217 ; s composing technique differs from many other poets of his clip such as William Butler Yeats whose temper was non expressed every bit frequently in his plants.

Eliot & # 8217 ; s Hagiographas purpose to touch people? s lives and seek to link with them. His purposes were to show existent life by conveying out true emotion. He did this by utilizing existent life scenarios that people could be more familiar with, instead than love affair and escapade. He was portion of the anti- romantic revolution ; therefore his verse forms have a deeper significance. ? His verse forms are more of a combination of fabulous, philosophical and Christian imagination in order to happen a poetic manner to poetically depict a modern dilemma. ? ( Daiches 89 )

What stands out from the beginning in Eliot & # 8217 ; s poesy is his alone manner and craft. He uses his ain signifier of linguistic communication that entreaties to the reader at the minute. He describes thoughts and gives graphic images that seem about realistic to the individual reading it and he makes one feel as if portion of the verse form. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Portrait of a Lady are as striking today as they were in 1917. The manner he manipulates the phrases handles the intermissions, and the counter pointing of informal and formal address. These are all techniques that represent accomplishment and have stayed with him steadily. A perfect illustration of this is the verse form? Four Living quarterss? where Eliot uses mystical method. He relates himself to the verse form and creates a fantastic sense of semblance. On the reverse in the verse form? The Waste Land? Eliot pulls off from human trouble by demoing his love for faith. However, it does non ignore his choler and fury against the corruptness of society alternatively he states that political relations are involved in faith. Furthermore, Eliot? s poems meant to hold an impact on the reader. They contain a deep significance that can hold a valid consequence on person. Particularly in his later plants were he was? traveling towards a spiritual sense of life. ? ( Miller 186 ) He ne’er confuses poesy for anything that might sound like poesy, or what insouciant readers might misidentify for poesy. In other words, Eliot? s poetries were non created for simple heads because they do non incorporate simple significances.

Eliot relates to his readers by making subjects that one may be able to refer to from our ain experiences and emotions. One may reason from his readings that he was a pessimistic and dark adult male because his literary manner frequently sets a melancholy and mystical temper. For case, The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock is considered to be one of his best plants because of its high dramatic unit. Yet, in Ash Wednesday and The Waste Land Eliot uses a alone ritual method that he developed independently and in which he strives to construct a spread between earthly objects and the word of God. Another illustration is in? the subject of failure of communicating, of positive relationship between a adult male and a adult female? ( Unger 90 ) and it is found in his early verse form, Hysteria and La Figlia Ate Piange. Most of Eliot? s works trade with the fact that work forces and adult females come from two different universes ; hence, being unable to pass on openly. These are all events that happen in 1s mundane life and by reading these verse forms one might be able to get by with these state of affairs.

Eliot besides portrays the subject of human isolation. While he uses the subject of alienation between adult male and adult female it may besides mean the larger subject of the persons isolation, his alienation from other people and the universe. Eliot speaks of adult male on a pursuit to go one with himself and happen himself at peace. ? It is Eliot method which marks him ineluctably as of this age. ? ( March 25 ) He wants to pass on the quandary of modern adult male in the thick of lost significance. The subject of isolation and disaffection from the universe and society is forward most seen in The Waste Land. This one of Eliot? s most popular verse forms depicting the disgust and dejecting personalities of society. The Waste Land is intensely personal, and the footing of its technique and patterned advance prevarications in an individualised scruples. The necessity to exceed one? s ego is a basic subject of the verse form. Further, societal duty is at the nucleus of the mythic and traditional elements combined in it. While isolation and disaffection from the universe is the subject of the verse form The Waste Land ; the same place, but speech production of God, is the subject in Ash Wednesday.

On the other manus, Four Living quarterss is different from Eliot? s other verse forms. It does non utilize mythic or ritual method ; alternatively he uses repeat and symbolism. Repeat is used? to allow the outgrowth of a pattern. ? ( Tate 24 ) Symbolism is used for the reader to hold a better apprehension of the verse form. This makes the verse form more interesting and the reader can associate to the authorship. Eliot is really dramatic in some ways but he besides knows his restrictions ; doing it a alone signifier a play. Even though Eliot is the most celebrated poet of his clip, his composing manner is frequently criticized. He gives graphic images that seem realistic and describes unusual thoughts. He uses his ain signifier of linguistic communication that entreaties to the reader at the minute. One might state that it is truly hard to separate the poet and the critic. Eliot? s play is so intense that frequently people criticize it and name it overdone. Eliot frequently ridiculed the critics that made jeer of his Hagiographas. Its dubious whether many people are capable of understanding his plants now but it is known that people in this epoch experience great sympathy towards him

Eliot is hard to understand, non because he knows so much or the age he lived in was so complex, but because he was a particular type of poet, a philosophical poet in an age of no belief. Burnt Norton shows how Eliot? s rational poesy may confound the reader. He uses things such as names of topographic points one has ne’er heard of, Grecian words that he does non explicate and poetries filled with clip events no 1 has of all time experienced. This may do the reader to fell nescient and non to be able to bask the verse form until one discovers what each thing signifies. One? s trouble to grok the verse form may be due to his usage of imaginativeness.

Eliot used batch of spiritual representation in many of his Hagiographas, nevertheless, that didn? t omit his point of position towards the corruptness of society. Alternatively, he ever insisted that political relations had a batch to make with faith. However, Eliot did look towards Christian hope. Towards his ulterior old ages, he early set himself to the calculated cultivation of a spiritual idealism and tradition, and to the purity as its most convenient institutionalization. Therefore, his Hagiographas made it clear that he had become the first Christian poet of his twenty-four hours and in his ordinary linguistic communication, one of the taking Christian vindicators. His ulterior work dealt with Christian morality, Eliot? s composing have a religious influence upon it readers. His philosophical manner of authorship is portrayed through most of his verse form, every bit good. Eliot is above instruction, being closer to philosophy that to history. Furthermore, the consolidative component in Eliot is divinity and it is non inaccurate to depict Eliot as a theologian gone astray. In better footings, Eliot is good in tuned with his theological side, non merely in being a gifted author but besides in groking the deep significance of moralss and faith.

In decision, Eliot expresses his emotions and himself through his Hagiographas. His full calling as a author is a history of his failures and greatest accomplishments. His fabulous and dramatic signifier attracts the reader to his verse forms. His earlier plants were full of depression and compunction and his later plants were more of a spiritual reformation. His composing manner matured as he matured with age and clip, but each of them different in their ain manner.

The Literary Style of T.S. Eliot

A author? s reading of the universe purely influences his literary public presentation. T.S. Eliot literary manner was extremely melancholic because the epoch that he was populating in was filled with anguish and depression. His plant of literature

vary from his usage of traditional dramatic construction to fabulous method. Eliot’s perceptual experience of life as nil more than a battle is expressed in his literary plants by his usage of realistic subjects such as depression, human isolation and through his spiritual imagination. For illustration, The Love Song of J.Alfred Prufrock is a dramatic soliloquy about love. On the other manus, The Waste Land and Ash Wednesday is more fabulous and explains deeper into faith and God. Eliot created his composing manner based on his ain personal experiences ; therefore his verse form all show unbelievable accomplishment.

Eliot & # 8217 ; s composing technique differs from many other poets of his clip such as William Butler Yeats whose temper was non expressed every bit frequently in his plants. Eliot & # 8217 ; s Hagiographas purpose to touch people? s lives and seek to link with them. His purposes were to show existent life by conveying out true emotion. He did this by utilizing existent life scenarios that people could be more familiar with, instead than love affair and escapade. He was portion of the anti- romantic revolution ; therefore his verse forms have a deeper significance. ? His verse forms are more of a combination of fabulous, philosophical and Christian imagination in order to happen a poetic manner to poetically depict a modern dilemma. ? ( Daiches 89 )

What stands out from the beginning in Eliot & # 8217 ; s poesy is his alone manner and craft. He uses his ain signifier of linguistic communication that entreaties to the reader at the minute. He describes thoughts and gives graphic images that seem about realistic to the individual reading it and he makes one feel as if portion of the verse form. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Portrait of a Lady are as striking today as they were in 1917. The manner he manipulates the phrases handles the intermissions, and the counter pointing of informal and formal address. These are all techniques that represent accomplishment and have stayed with him steadily. A perfect illustration of this is the verse form? Four Living quarterss? where Eliot uses mystical method. He relates himself to the verse form and creates a fantastic sense of semblance. On the reverse in the verse form? The Waste Land? Eliot pulls off from human trouble by demoing his love for faith. However, it does non ignore his choler and fury against the corruptness of society alternatively he states that political relations are involved in faith. Furthermore, Eliot? s poems meant to hold an impact on the reader. They contain a deep significance that can hold a valid consequence on person. Particularly in his later plants were he was? traveling towards a spiritual sense of life. ? ( Miller 186 ) He ne’er confuses poesy for anything that might sound like poesy, or what insouciant readers might misidentify for poesy. In other words, Eliot? s poetries were non created for simple heads because they do non incorporate simple significances.

Eliot relates to his readers by making subjects that one may be able to refer to from our ain experiences and emotions. One may reason from his readings that he was a pessimistic and dark adult male because his literary manner frequently sets a melancholy and mystical temper. For case, The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock is considered to be one of his best plants because of its high dramatic unit. Yet, in Ash Wednesday and The Waste Land Eliot uses a alone ritual method that he developed independently and in which he strives to construct a spread between earthly objects and the word of God. Another illustration is in? the subject of failure of communicating, of positive relationship between a adult male and a adult female? ( Unger 90 ) and it is found in his early verse form, Hysteria and La Figlia Ate Piange. Most of Eliot? s works trade with the fact that work forces and adult females come from two different universes ; hence, being unable to pass on openly. These are all events that happen in 1s mundane life and by reading these verse forms one might be able to get by with these state of affairs.

Eliot besides portrays the subject of human isolation. While he uses the subject of alienation between adult male and adult female it may besides mean the larger subject of the persons isolation, his alienation from other people and the universe. Eliot speaks of adult male on a pursuit to go one with himself and happen himself at peace. ? It is Eliot method which marks him ineluctably as of this age. ? ( March 25 ) He wants to pass on the quandary of modern adult male in the thick of lost significance. The subject of isolation and disaffection from the universe and society is forward most seen in The Waste Land. This one of Eliot? s most popular verse forms depicting the disgust and dejecting personalities of society. The Waste Land is intensely personal, and the footing of its technique and patterned advance prevarications in an individualised scruples. The necessity to exceed one? s ego is a basic subject of the verse form. Further, societal duty is at the nucleus of the mythic and traditional elements combined in it. While isolation and disaffection from the universe is the subject of the verse form The Waste Land ; the same place, but speech production of God, is the subject in Ash Wednesday.

On the other manus, Four Living quarterss is different from Eliot? s other verse forms. It does non utilize mythic or ritual method ; alternatively he uses repeat and symbolism. Repeat is used? to allow the outgrowth of a pattern. ? ( Tate 24 ) Symbolism is used for the reader to hold a better apprehension of the verse form. This makes the verse form more interesting and the reader can associate to the authorship. Eliot is really dramatic in some ways but he besides knows his restrictions ; doing it a alone signifier a play. Even though Eliot is the most celebrated poet of his clip, his composing manner is frequently criticized. He gives graphic images that seem realistic and describes unusual thoughts. He uses his ain signifier of linguistic communication that entreaties to the reader at the minute. One might state that it is truly hard to separate the poet and the critic. Eliot? s play is so intense that frequently people criticize it and name it overdone. Eliot frequently ridiculed the critics that made jeer of his Hagiographas. Its dubious whether many people are capable of understanding his plants now but it is known that people in this epoch experience great sympathy towards him

Eliot is hard to understand, non because he knows so much or the age he lived in was so complex, but because he was a particular type of poet, a philosophical poet in an age of no belief. Burnt Norton shows how Eliot? s rational poesy may confound the reader. He uses things such as names of topographic points one has ne’er heard of, Grecian words that he does non explicate and poetries filled with clip events no 1 has of all time experienced. This may do the reader to fell nescient and non to be able to bask the verse form until one discovers what each thing signifies. One? s trouble to grok the verse form may be due to his usage of imaginativeness.

Eliot used batch of spiritual representation in many of his Hagiographas, nevertheless, that didn? t omit his point of position towards the corruptness of society. Alternatively, he ever insisted that political relations had a batch to make with faith. However, Eliot did look towards Christian hope. Towards his ulterior old ages, he early set himself to the calculated cultivation of a spiritual idealism and tradition, and to the purity as its most convenient institutionalization. Therefore, his Hagiographas made it clear that he had become the first Christian poet of his twenty-four hours and in his ordinary linguistic communication, one of the taking Christian vindicators. His ulterior work dealt with Christian morality, Eliot? s composing have a religious influence upon it readers. His philosophical manner of authorship is portrayed through most of his verse form, every bit good. Eliot is above instruction, being closer to philosophy that to history. Furthermore, the consolidative component in Eliot is divinity and it is non inaccurate to depict Eliot as a theologian gone astray. In better footings, Eliot is good in tuned with his theological side, non merely in being a gifted author but besides in groking the deep significance of moralss and faith.

In decision, Eliot expresses his emotions and himself through his Hagiographas. His full calling as a author is a history of his failures and greatest accomplishments. His fabulous and dramatic signifier attracts the reader to his verse forms. His earlier plants were full of depression and compunction and his later plants were more of a spiritual reformation. His composing manner matured as he matured with age and clip, but each of them different in their ain manner.

Bradbrook, M.C. Contemporary Literary Criticism Vol. CLC 2. Detroit, Michigan: Gale

Research Company, 1974. 125-130

March, Richard. T.S. Eliot Symposium. New York: Books for Libraries Press, 1968

Riley, Carolyn. Contemporary Literary Criticism Vol. CCL 1. Detroit, Michigan: Gale

Research Company, 1973. 89-92

Tate, Allen. T.S. Eliot The Man and His Works. New York, New York: Dell Publishing

Company, Inc. , 1966

Schneider, Elizabeth. Contemporary Modern Criticism. Vol. CLC 3 Detroit, Michigan

Gale Research Company 1975. 135-141

Cite this The Literary Style Of TS Eliot

The Literary Style Of TS Eliot. (2017, Jul 21). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/the-literary-style-of-ts-eliot-essay-2783/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page