We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

To Clone or not to clone

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Cloning is an issue that has been evolving during time. At the

begining, cloning was been researched and was described as something

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
To Clone or not to clone
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

that was hard to reach. Even science fiction movies, such as

Multiplicity, were produced about cloning. As the time went through,

cloning became a reality. In 1996 “Dolly”, the first mammal, a sheep was

born. Dolly was created by Ian Wilmut, an embryologist of the Rosling

insitute ( World Book, http://www.worldbook.com ). Since then, many

mammals, such as mice and calves were created.

Right now, there is a

fear, that humans might be the next to be cloned.

Ruth macklin and Charles Krauthammer discuss this matter in two

essays were they state whether cloning is right or wrong.

Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, wrote an essay about this

issue. “Human Cloning? Don’t Just Say No” is the title of her article.

Her essay discusses the negative response of the people to Human

Cloning. As the title of the essay says: “Human Cloning? Don’t Just Say

No”, Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in

Macklin talks about Human Clones not being accepted as human beings.


states that an ethicist said once, that human cloning would be a

violation to “the right to genetic identity” (Perspectives of

Contemporary Issues, pg. 508). Macklin doubts about the exsistence of

this right. She explains many points about Human Cloning and about

ethics. One of the points she mentiones, is about the violation to human

dignity. Theologians say that cloning would be a violation to dignity

and also that cloned humans would be treated with less respect than

Another issue she discusses is the fact that Human Clones could be used

as human farms or organ donors. Macklin gives many examples about the

cases where human cloning might be accepted. Mothers that can not have

children, families that have children that are sick to death or also

couples that may have genetic defects (Perspectives of Contemporary

In conclusion, Macklin thinks, that human cloning should be accepted or

at least an opportunity should been given to develop Human Cloning.

On the other hand, Charles Krauthammer, the author of the second

essay “Of Headless Mice…..And Men” is totally against Cloning in every

way. His essay talks about the cloning that was made in mice.

Researchers have been able to locate different genes and than delete

some genes, just to see what comes out. They erased the clone that

creates the head and produced headless mice that obviosly died when the

Krauthammer does not understand, how humans can create such type of

mice. He talks about the chance of creating humans with no heads. He

says, that the goal of these production of headless humans, could be

kept as an organ farm. He also gives examples of Cloning, such as the

possibility to create models, and geniuses (Perspectives of Contemporary

Issues, pg. 510). Krauthammer mentiones that President Bill Clinton

banned cloning, but it won’t be long until it is accepted. Krauthammer

cloncusion is the prohibition of Human cloning and every type of

These essays are a clear example of what cloning is and what the

responses might be. As Macklin is in favor of Cloning, Krauthammer is

not. Macklin’s essay talks more about cloning as having a twin, a person

that will be living with us and form part of the family. A companion

that will be there to live life as it is.

There are other terms for cloning such as “carbon copy”.

On the other hand, Krauthammer’s essay describes human clones with no

heads. Human farms that will be there in case something goes wrong with

the original. These half human beings would be different, they would be

kept “alive”, like an organ reserve if the original loses a hand, then

the clone gives that person a hand. What kind of thoughts are those? Is

it possible that scientists have come to a point were they want to

create “Monsters”? This would really be a violation to human dignity. A

harm to the cloned person that might not have a brain to

think, but he sure will have the same arms, legs, hands, etc… as the

original. He might not have the same face as the original, but he will

have a heart and I am sure that he would not like to live headless. If

cloning will be this way, than it should be completly banned.

Both essays are very persuasive, but there is a difference in

both. The examples given by the authors have a huge roll in the

persuasive part, Krauthammer has examples that might be more persuasive

They both explain the two faces of cloning and under which conditiond it

might be developed. Macklin gives us an explanation trying to convince

the public of giving human cloning a chance to happen. She also

describes cloning as some kind of human farm, but mostly what she

explains is that cloning can be taken as something normal, as an in-

vitro fertilization, for example. Many people do not really know what

human cloning really is and misunderstand its meaning. Macklin gives a

short explanation, but as every experiment, it must have some

Krauthammer’s essay is totally against cloning. He is very persuasive

and gives examples that will change the way of thinking of many people

and turn them against cloning. He gives exapmles, that are almost

imposibble to believe. Headless people, headless mice, keeping human

clones alive as an organ farm, etc. All these examples are a reality and

anyone who is mature enough and has reasoning will be against the

This essays have the same topic, but are different. Although both

talk about human cloning, the essays are different.

As we could see, in Macklin’s essay, the cloned humans are considered

persons. Krauthammer’s essay mostly discusses human clones as human

farms. Macklin talks about cloning being banned, but she does not state

who banned it. Krauthammer explains this as saying that “Dolly” made

president Clinton create a comission and temporary banned human

clonning. Eventhough there is a temporary ban, this could someday be

accepted. Krauthammer thinks, that this should be banned forever.

There are a lot of different opinions about cloning and also a lot

of mistaken thoughts about this issue. Many articles have been written

and discussed. Many questions are to be answered and more research is to

be done. This type of essays can clear some doubts people have, but are

not enough to say “I am in favor…” or “I am against…”. It is an

issue that will be a controversy for al long time. It might be right to

create a human clone as a person, but it is very wrong to use a human

clone as a human farm. Everyone has the right to live a normal life. If

this right will be violated than, no cloned humans should be created.

As Macklin says: “A world not safe foe cloned humans would be a world

Macklin, Ruth “Human Cloning? Don’t Just Say No” Perspectives on
Contemporary Issues. Pages 507-508

Krauthammer, Charles “Of Headless Mice…And Men” Perspectives on
Contemporary Issues. Pages 509-511

Wachbroit, Robert “Human Cloning Isn’t as Sacry as it Sounds” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com

Cite this To Clone or not to clone

To Clone or not to clone. (2018, Jun 09). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/to-clone-or-not-to-clone-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page