Windows Installation - Software Essay Example
Advantages and Disadvantages of Windows Server 2008 Server Core and Virtual Servers In this Analysis assessment I’m going to explain some advantages and disadvantages of windows server 2008 server core and virtual servers - Windows Installation introduction. What environments windows server core installation ideal, and I will explain if the security benefits of a core server outweigh the lack of a Graphical User Interface (GUI). I also will go through some advantages and disadvantages of implicating a virtual server in a live network. Finally I will be giving my response to this statement “The drawback of virtual servers is the loss of a physical machine that can lead to the loss of numerous virtual servers and numerous services on the network. Some advantages of a Windows Server 2008 Server Core installation is, greater stability, with less resources taken up versus a full server installation you have more resources for your server to manage only things you need it to manage. Simplified management, compared to a full server installation you have much less installed on your server. This makes it much easier to manage and configure.
Reduction in maintenance, this means fewer hot fixes for roles/services you aren’t using so this means theirs much less to maintain. The reduction in the amount of memory and hard disk requirements, install what you need and leave out what you don’t need. You don’t want anything to take up your precious resources that you’re not even using in your server. Finally reduced attack surface, with less installed on your server there are less services to be targeted to an attack. Now for the disadvantaged are the lack of a GUI, so if an administrator is not familiar with the command environment it will make it that much harder to maintain. I see a lot of griping about it not supporting .Net Frameworks and there’s also no support for the managed code. There also seems to be limited amount of roles and features in a server core installation. Now we will get to some advantages and disadvantages of a virtual server. First there’s much less energy consumed because of the fact you don’t physically have the every single server set up in some room racking up your electric bill. Not only can doing this save energy it can also reduce a company’s cost to buying networking equipment, save the company money and save yourself all the extra work of setting up each physical server one by one. You get fast provisioning of your data through the server instead of going down the chain of server to get the information you want you can have one machine doing it. In addition this will also create a much faster boot up time. By doing a virtual machine you can also create a backup of your VM much easier in case of system failure. Some disadvantages in implication a VM into your server structure, well for starters an administrator might have an increased workload do to the fact there are more places for a file to go so tracking them could be a full time job.
essay sample on "Windows Installation"? We will write a cheap essay sample on "Windows Installation" specifically for you for only $12.90/page
It doesn’t cut the need for any more less IT professionals due to constant monitoring of security and firewall problems to ensure no data is stolen or the virtual remote environment. Now I will go though some possible environments that a server core may be useful. You could use it numerous ways but let’s go though some more popular way. First you could use it as an infrastructure server, branch office server, server consolidation and testing, and you can extend the life of your existing hardware. Well I see it like this the more services installed on a server the more likely your server is vulnerable to an outside attack. My opinion is depending on your needs for a server I believe that the security benefit most definitely does outweigh the fact that there is no GUI. Implicating a VM server in to live network kind goes in line with my VM server advantages and disadvantages described above. So I’m not going to go too far in-depth with this. You can deploy another VM server very fast and efficient if needed. More room can be reclaimed in a company’s server room not to mention no need to worry about rapidly cooling more hardware that can be used in your VM. Now I guess the disadvantages I see are does your company have the staff knowledgeable enough to complete this task? Does your company have a backup plan in case of downtime while implicating this method into your live server? Now my response to the statement described as above, I guess I don’t fully understand this statement I’m interpreting as, a company implicates the VM into their network infrastructure.
They eliminate physical hardware now not needed because now they have a VM that can handle multiple machines in one, which is true. I just don’t understand how it can lead to a loss of numerous virtual servers, or services on the network. Well if a company is going to implicate a VM into their network, why would they go ahead and make the necessary changes if it’s not going to do what their network they already have is already capable of doing? Maybe I’m overlooking this statement, but I see one part contradicting the other part of the
sentence. This is telling me they would lose everything and have no network if they went to this VM technology.