Judith Sargent Stevens Murray writes on the equality of men and women in 1790. Murray wrote this for the public and explains the difference between men and women and how women were degraded in 1790. Murray writes about how women were not allowed to accompany their husbands to certain places because they were not qualified enough and it made the feel inferior. A woman’s place was said to be in the kitchen or sewing. Murray is not bias in her writing but may be looked down on for speaking out against how women were treated at the time.
Men may not have seen how women were treated inferiorly and seen the writing as a woman being out of line. Murray’s reason to be honest is to document how women were treated during her time. I believe that Murray’s piece is well written and goes into depth about how men treated women and about the expectations that men had of women. Molly Wallace wrote to the public about what she learned while attending the Young Ladies’ Academy in Philadelphia.
Wallace believed that it was not fair that boys were taught certain things that girls were not offered to learn because it was believed that they would have no use for it. Wallace argues that boys are taught Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, not because they are going to use it or have any advantages by knowing it, but because being knowledgeable about them bring about habits that are valuable. She believes that girls deserve to acquire the same habits that boys are given the chance to learn.
Wallace is not bias in her writing and gains the self confidence from speaking out about what she believes. Wallace’s opinion that influenced her writing is based on being a woman in 1792 and being educated but also being expected to use her education in the home. She did not have any reason to be dishonest and was honest to speak to the public about her thoughts on how educated women were treated. I believe that women should have been treated the same as men no matter what. I think it was wrong of men to degrade women and not allow educated women to work outside of the home.
A black woman by the name of Matilda wrote about how women, even women of color, have as much right to an education as men. Matilda wrote this to the public so that others could read what she wrote and have their own opinions on it. She believes that all women should be able to read books and gain the knowledge that each hold in their pages. Matilda is not bias in anyway and cannot lose or gain anything based on her writings. Her opinion is based on living life as a woman in the times that men were the only ones who were thought to have a right to an education.
Matilda had no reason to be dishonest and was honest about how she felt about the way women were treated. I believe that Matilda is very up front about her feelings and that women should have been able to learn to read so they could pass the knowledge on to their daughters. Harriet Robinson wrote about on how the laws did not protect women and enabled the men to take their wife’s wages from her whenever they wanted. Robinson wrote this for the public to have a view into how women were treated and not protected by the law when they should have been.
Women did not have rights to their own money if they were married and were viewed as property of their husbands. Robinson is not bias in her document and could not gain anything but if men took her writings in the wrong way she could lose respect from others. She writes on her opinions as a woman living in times where women had very little rights. She had no reason to be dishonest and was honest about how her life and the lives of other women were during her time. I believe that women were treated unfairly and should have had the rights to their own wages.
I disagree with how the husbands of women viewed their wives as property and could claim them as such as well as take their wages as their own. Soujourner Truth wrote about living as a female slave during times when women’s rights were basically nonexistent. Truth writes publically and talks about how white women were helped into carriages, over mud puddles, and given the best places, yet she received none of these things. Truth was not bias in her writings and her opinions were those of her own from experiencing life as a female slave.
She did not have any reason to be dishonest and was just speaking out about how women slaves were treated. I believe Truth’s accounts of how her life was because even though women were seen as property to their husbands, there was still some connection there where they were loved. Slaves, however, had no emotional bond with their owner and were seen solely as property. Sincerely, An enraged pissed off college student hoping you get what you deserve. Sincerely, An enraged pissed off college student hoping you get what you deserve. Sincerely, An enraged pissed off college student hoping you get what you deserve.