We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

RACIAL PROFILING vs CRIMINAL PROFILING

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Racial profiling is a societal job that has erupted throughout the state. Many states, metropoliss, societal groups, and faculty members have studied racial profiling and how race and ethnicity may play a portion in constabulary probes.

Allegations of racial profiling have been around for old ages, and still is a topic that creates a batch on media ballyhoo and contention environing constabularies and their interaction with minorities. In Toronto, there have been legion newspaper and telecasting articles impeaching the Toronto Police Service of systematic racism ( Canadian Race Relations Foundations, 2005 ) .

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
RACIAL PROFILING vs CRIMINAL PROFILING
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Racial profiling should non be confused with condemnable profiling, because they are two different things ( Mucchetti, 2006, pp. 1-32 ) . Racial profiling is non specific to one race or one state. Actually being racially profiled can go on to anyone at any clip no affair what race or sex or state they live in.

This paper will analyze racial profiling and condemnable profiling by constabulary and explicating how the different sociological positions ; functionalist, struggle, interactionist, and feminist positions view it.

The paper will besides try to reason if there is systematic racial profiling by the Toronto Police. My thesis is the Toronto Police does non consistently racially profile, alternatively they consistently reprehensively profile.

In order to analyze racial profiling and reprehensively profiling one must understand the differences between the two. Although there is no clear or cosmopolitan definition of racial profiling, there is a common constituent in all of the definitions ( Ontario Human Rights Commission, 2009 ) . This paper defines racial profiling as “ the pattern of aiming racial minorities for condemnable probe entirely or, in portion, on the footing of their skin coloring material ” ( Court of Appeal for Ontario, 1999 ) .

Harmonizing to the Harvard Latino Law Review, condemnable profiling involves:

The usage of racial or cultural features by constabulary sections in halting an person because his or her description lucifers that of an existent suspect. In this sense, race maps as the equivalent of hair colour or tallness, which can so be used in combination with other factors to paint a more accurate portrayal of a suspected felon. As a consequence, generalised impressions of condemnable leaning are non projected onto an single because of that individual ‘s rank in a peculiar racial or cultural group ( Mucchetti, 2006, pp. 1-32 ) .

The term racial profiling began in the eightiess, when the Drug Enforcement Agency ( DEA ) in the United States developed and used common features to profile drug messengers as portion of the bureaus “ war on drugs ” ( Harris, 2006, pp. 213-239 ) . When community members began to kick about constabulary probes and their actions towards minorities the utilizations of the profiling technique emerged to be labelled as ‘racial profiling ‘ ( Ibid ) .

Functionalist, struggle, interactionist, and feminist positions all believe racial profiling is one of favoritism, force per unit area and use of subsidiary groups so that the dominant group can exert their societal category, race, and sexual high quality over others ( Banks, Eberhardt, & A ; Ross, 2006, pp. 1169-1190 ) . Prejudice in racial profiling is caused by psychological and socially constructed influences, where persons are influenced by their milieus to detest another solemnly based on their race ( Guimond, Dambrun, Michinov, & A ; Duarte, 2003, pp. 697-721 ) .

The functionalist position believes society is divided into two groups, the dominant and subsidiary. And, that these groups are a natural portion of society ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) . Functionalist besides believe society is non balanced in footings of race, because it is natural for one group of people to be superior over the other and that racial equality will cut down the dominate group power on subsidiary group ( Kimberle Williams Crenshaw, 1988, pp. 1331-1387 ) . Therefore, functionalist position racial profiling as being formed by dominate groups to do the subsidiary groups to experience inferior, so they can hold their ain functions in society because it is how society intended it to be.

Conflict position believe that all groups in society are engaged in a uninterrupted power battle because the dominant groups who have societal, political and economical power, battle to keep their privileged place over the subsidiary groups ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) . Conflict theoreticians besides believe everyone is equal, despite his or her race, sex or employment, opposed to the functionalist theory ( Ibid ) . They besides believe racialized and cultural inequality is caused due to economic stratification ( Ibid ) . The dominate group determines what Torahs should be enforced and what punishments are to be administered. They besides determine what subsidiary group will be targeted, arrested and punished below the belt in order to keep their places in a capitalist society. The constabulary are used as a tool by the dominate group to keep their place in society. Racial profiling by constabulary is merely one of the methods used by constabulary to implement the regulations of the dominate category.

Symbolic interactionist position can be used to explicate officer ‘s behavior which is based in societal psychological science ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) . The societal kineticss affecting the interaction between officer and citizen may act upon officer ‘s behavior and do them to racially profile. The interactionist attack emphasizes how racialized socialisation contributes to feelings of solidarity with one ‘s ain racialized or cultural group and ill will towards others ( Ibid ) which could do citizens to dispute officers ‘ authorization if they felt their individualities were being challenged, their civil autonomies were being restricted, or the officer was moving in a ill-mannered behavior. Although symbolic interactionist position does non straight explicate why constabulary ab initio stop minorities, it does explicate the societal interaction between the officer and citizen and how it could ensue in the citizen feeling of being racially profiled if the officer ‘s interaction was professional.

Feminist position is based on critical-conflict position ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) . A feminist position on racial profiling is about gender and race differences, and the restrictions associated with traditional male-dominance in society. There is no 1 women’s rightist position that can explicate a societal job such as racial profiling because all are theories of subjugation, differences, and inequality ( Ibid ) .

Social militant groups along with minority groups claims ‘ of systematic racial profiling by the Toronto Police Service exists and refer to published articles to back up their claims, such as the 2002 series of newspaper articles written by the Toronto Star, and the deficiency of racial statistics compiled by the Toronto Police Service. In these articles, the Toronto Star articles used empirical informations collected from the Toronto Police Service ‘s Criminal Information Processing System ( CIPS ) database. Harmonizing to the newspaper articles that examined 480,000 files contained within the database, associating to collar and traffic Michigans, claim “ Blacks arrested by Toronto Police are treated more harshly than white… ” , and “ a disproportional figure of black automobilists are ticketed for misdemeanors that merely surface following a traffic halt. Harmonizing to civil libertarians, community leaders and criminologists, the difference could propose that constabulary use racial profiling in make up one’s minding whom to draw over ” ( Toronto Star Newspaper, 2009, p. A01 ) .

Social and minority groups besides support their claims of systematic racial profiling by the Toronto Police Service, as the Service does non roll up or let go of race base statistics. They argue “ One fears that the lone ground the Police Board refuses to let go of this information is to guarantee that the populace does non acquire updated information on racial profiling ” ( Toronto Police Accountability Coalition, 2008 ) .

This paper concedes that racial profiling may be on an single footing ( micro-level ) within the Toronto Police Service. This was confirmed by Chief Blair of the Toronto Police Service who was talking a diverseness conference and said: “ Racism is a human weakness. Racial profiling can happen. We ‘ve acknowledged that right up forepart… ” ( Doolittle, 2009 ) .

As a constabulary officer, it is obvious that there are mistakes in the Toronto Star ‘s decisions. The Toronto Star compiled its ‘ informations utilizing the files contained in the CIPS database, which merely contained files associating to collar and tickets issued to individuals. The job utilizing merely this database is that it does non take into history the figure of people the constabularies really investigate where there were no apprehension or tickets issued, or the fact that the CIPS system excludes information on portion 1 Provincial Offences tickets ; i.e. seat belt, rushing etc. as it merely includes portion 3 Provincial offenses tickets ( more serious offenses ) . By merely choosing the CIPS database and non the true figure of individuals stopped by constabulary skewed the concluding consequences. Professor Edward B. Harvey, a PhD, from the University of Toronto confirmed this fact that the Toronto Police database, which was non designed for research intents, contains so many defects that its utilizations in research is limited ( Harvey, 2003 ) .

The data-collection by the Toronto Star was besides disputed by Allan Gold based on the differentiation between reactive and proactive policing ( 2003, pp. 391-399 ) . Gold argues reactive policing could impute to claims of racial profiling while proactive policing will non. When it comes to the aggregation of informations, the Toronto Start uses both manners of patroling which flawed their decision ( Ibid ) .

It is really good known that any and every methodological analysis in the societal scientific disciplines is unfastened to unfavorable judgment and onslaught ( May, 2001 ) . Max Weber a pioneering sociologist and societal research worker stresses the importance of proper methodological analysis in societal research in analyzing any societal job, and how important it is to understanding the job ( Alasuutari, 2010, pp. 139-155 ) . The Toronto Star ‘s article and how they used the informations and the skip of critical information has skewed the concluding consequences. These mistakes have created false grounds of systematic racial profiling by the Toronto Police Service, which has been proven.

The statement of race based offense statistics day of the month back to 1929 ( Johnston, 1994, p. 166 ) . Social militant groups along with minorities group ‘s have argued that the ground Toronto Police Service is non let go ofing race based offense statistics is due to the that the Service in fact racially profiling, which would be proven by the statistics ( Toronto Police Accountability Coalition, 2008 ) . In fact in 1989 the opposite statement was used by community groups when so Inspector Julian Fantino released offense based statistics, claiming them to be inherently racist naming for their abolition ( Johnston, 1994, p. 166 ) .

Harmonizing to Robin S. Engel an Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati and Director of the University of Cincinnati Policing Institute,

Data will ne’er ‘prove ‘ or ‘disprove ‘ racially biased policing, we contend that vehicle halt informations aggregation and analysis should ne’er be viewed-either by constabulary or occupant stakeholders-as a base on balls fail trial. Rather, it should be viewed as a diagnostic tool to assist nail the determinations, geographic countries, and processs that should acquire precedence attending when the bureau, in concert with concerned occupants, identifies its following stairss for turn toing the job or perceptual experience of racial profiling ( 2008, pp. 1-36 ) .

Institutional racism “ consists of the daily patterns of an organisation that have a harmful impact on members of a subsidiary group ” ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) and delivered at the macro-level. In order for the statement of systematic racial profiling by the Toronto Police Service to be true, the Service would hold to hold policies or processs in topographic point that sanctioned it. In fact, the Toronto Police Service does non approve any signifier of racial profiling by its members. The Service has legion regulations and processs that prohibit racial profiling along with a Diversity Management Unit that monitors all human rights ailments and ensures that all members provide a bias-free service to the community ( 2009 ) . Members of the Toronto Police Service are besides being invariably reminded their duty in supplying a bias-free service to the community. These reminders are done through preparation and instruction, the Services Core Values and letters to the members of the Service, such as a missive written in 2003 by so Chief Juilian Fantino who wrote ;

… we must be cognizant that societal and institutional force per unit areas can take to unacceptable cases of racial prejudice in patroling. Police officers must do their determinations to prosecute the populace based on the actions or behavior that they observe, on existent informant information and/or on manus grounds. Police officers must hold articulable cause or sensible evidences in order to prosecute legitimate jurisprudence enforcement activities with a member of the populace. We must non do any determination to halt, inquiry and/or hunt citizens based entirely on a individual ‘s race. All of us, at all times, must supply just and respectful service to all individuals irrespective of race.

I believe that the best manner to cover with this and all other issues is merely by ever handling people, all people, professionally. Let ‘s go on to handle all people and each other with self-respect and regard. Professional behavior means that we will ne’er travel incorrect or be found desiring in our traffics with all constituents of our diverse society ( Toronto Police Service, 2003 ) .

To guarantee that members of the Toronto Police Service are non racially profiling the Toronto Police Service is working in partnership with the Ontario Human Rights Commission to guarantee the Service ‘s hiring patterns reflect the diverseness of the City of Toronto, developing officers in moralss, and diverseness and how to acknowledge racial prejudice policing ( 2009 )

Although the Toronto Police Service does non consistently racially profile, they do consistently reprehensively profile.

Criminal profiling besides known as Criminal Investigative Analysis ( CIA ) is an effectual tool enabling jurisprudence enforcement bureaus to implement the jurisprudence more efficaciously ( Royal Canadian Mounted Police ) . The beginnings of condemnable profiling can be traced back to 1800s when it was foremost used in instance to place Jack to Ripper ( Winerman, 2004, p. 66 ) . The current usage of condemnable profiling by jurisprudence enforcement was developed the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) , in the United States by their Behaviour Science Unit ( Ibid ) . The utilizations of this technique has besides with stood the threshold of jurisprudence and been recognized as a valid investigative technique.

Condemnable profiling involves a multidisciplinary attack that examines and understands condemnable behavior utilizing many sociological positions. Functionalist perspective position offense as a consequence of the deficiency moral order within a society which is necessary to keep society together ( Kendall, Nygaard, & A ; Thompson, 2011 ) . Conflict perspective suggests that disadvantage groups are more likely to go felons than those who are privileged. It besides sees higher-income citizens being able to conceal their condemnable Acts of the Apostless better and punished otherwise so disadvantage groups, if caught. Symbolic interactionist position helps us understand how people learn to go felons and how being labelled a ‘criminals ‘ can increase the chance that the individual will prosecute in condemnable behavior ( Ibid ) . Each position hints condemnable behavior to societal conditions instead than to the person ‘s race, sex, ethnicity or disablement.

Condemnable profiling can be broken into two phases ; the first could be described as general profiling and the 2nd as specific profiling ( Palermo, 2002, pp. 383-385 ) . General profiling is portion of an officer ‘s mundane responsibilities and probes of any offense, such as traffic Michigans, while specific profiling is more refined in the officer ‘s attack to grounds and offense scene probes ( Ibid ) .

Condemnable profiling can besides take on several signifiers. The first signifier of condemnable profiling can be institutional, which is where the organisation develops the profile of the wrongdoer, while the 2nd for can be formed by the single officer. This signifier of condemnable profiling is developed by the officer from his or her ain experiences ( Higgins & A ; Gabbidon, 2009, pp. 77-88 ) .

In today ‘s policing, Toronto Police Service front-line officers incorporated the general profiling facet of condemnable profiling when executing their general responsibilities but will on juncture incorporate specific profiling facets when reacting to a serious wireless call. The officers will besides utilize both institutional and single signifiers of condemnable profiling every bit good.

A basic signifier of institutional condemnable profiling is taught to members of the Toronto Police Service when he or she attends the Ontario Police College as a basic recruit. The recruits are provided the necessary cognition of Torahs, processs and accomplishments that will assist them execute their responsibilities as frontline officers. With accent on the nucleus map of constabulary services found in the Ontario Police Service Act subdivision 4 ( 2 ) which focuses on Crime Prevention, Law Enforcement, Assistance to Victims of Crime, Public Order Maintenance, and Emergency Response ( 2009 ) . The officers are besides provided developing a assortment of topics including, moralss, anti-racism and community policing ( Ibid ) . The preparation does non halt when a officer leave the Ontario Police College, the officers are farther trained at the Toronto Police College in the Services ‘ Rule and Procedures, Core Values and Mission Statement of the Service along with officer safety preparation.

Military officers develop single condemnable profiling accomplishments when they start policing the streets of Toronto. The officer will react to 1000s of calls changing from larcenies, house servants, battles, to vehicle Michigans. Each clip the officer interacts with the persons, he or she develops their ain trade name of policing and single condemnable profiling techniques.

In community policing, officers work closely with job communities, in developing schemes to assist the community combat offense. Working with the community, officers receive information from abodes on possible condemnable activities and persons within the community, so that they can develop schemes to cut down offense. Military officers will integrate all facets of condemnable profiling to either be reactive or proactive in an effort to cut down criminalism.

Bing reactive, officers focus their attending on direct information that is received from the community to cut down the current job within the community, while proactive policing allows the officers to profile activities and persons within the community to forestall farther victimization.

Military officers besides use condemnable profiling when they perform traffic Michigans. The officer use single felon profiling when he or she selects an country to supervise the traffic flow, which is based on the officer ‘s personal experience. The officer might choose an country where there is a high rate of incidences of neglecting to halt at a mark or a subdivision or roadway where vehicle velocity. When the officer decides to halt the vehicle for a misdemeanor of the Highway Traffic Act, he or she once more reprehensively profiles the vehicle and residents for officer safety grounds. The officer will carry on enrollment cheques on the vehicle and the registered proprietor, all the clip detecting the residents of the vehicle before halting the vehicle, in order identify any condemnable activity. This portion of condemnable profiling it taught to the officers by the Ontario Police College and the Toronto Police College ( institutional felon profiling ) as portion of the Officers Safety Section within both colleges, in order to maintain the officer safe.

There are those who argue that condemnable profiling is non supported by scientific grounds and should be dismisses as rhetoric and ne’er be used. This paper agrees that condemnable profiling is limited in empirical informations but is still a utile tool to battle offense. Harmonizing to a research survey which states, “ condemnable profiling will prevail as a pseudoscientific technique until such clip as empirical and consistent surveies are conducted on the abilities of big groups of active profilers to foretell, with more preciseness and greater magnitude, the features of wrongdoers ( Snook, Eastwood, Gendreau, Goggin & A ; Cullen, 2007, pp. 437-453 ) .

In decision, it is of import to rethink racial profiling through the lens of condemnable profiling and to cut down race to the function that it is supposedly playing in racial profiling, viz. a prognostic factor ; to handle race no otherwise than we would gender, category, age, or any other profile that works ; to take the focal point off from race and topographic point it on condemnable profiling more by and large. Rethinking racial profiling through the lens of condemnable profiling really sheds light on constabulary patterns.

The Toronto Police Service does non consistently racially profile as the media, societal and minority groups would hold us believe. In order for the Toronto Police Service to be blamed for consistently racially profiling, the Service would hold to be a program or process in topographic point to back up it. The Toronto Police Service does non back up any signifier of racial profiling by it members

Condemnable profiling plays a important and important function in discouraging and battling condemnable behavior and activity. Condemnable profiling provides a valuable tool for constabulary in which they can measure and analyse the forms of condemnable behavior ( Turvey, 2008, pp. 1-43 ) .

The Toronto Police Service consistently reprehensively profiles and treats the race constituent of condemnable profiling no otherwise than they would gender, category, age, or any other profile that works.

Cite this RACIAL PROFILING vs CRIMINAL PROFILING

RACIAL PROFILING vs CRIMINAL PROFILING. (2017, Jul 16). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/racial-profiling-vs-criminal-profiling/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page