Molar Mass Of Acetone Biology Essay

The molar mass of a trial fluid propanone was determined via the measuring of the vapour denseness at a average H2O boiling temperature of 98.3 & A ; deg ; C and a average force per unit area of 734.6 millimeter of mercury. The molar mass of propanone was found to be 73.13 ± 22.3 g/mol compared to the known value of 58.08 g/mol, hence, giving a per centum mistake of 25.90 % . Major beginning of mistake is due to the setup non being wholly dry within every test in order to give the most effectual consequences.

We will write a custom sample essay on
Molar Mass Of Acetone Biology
specifically for you for only $13.9/page
Order now

Background: The mass of a substance expressed in gms in footings of moles is known as the molar mass1. There are assorted methods in which the molar mass can be determined. First method is the vapor denseness method, a known value is weighted and the volume is converted to STP, therefore molar mass can be determined. Another method is the cryoscopic method in which a known measure of a substance is added to a dissolver, therefore the freeze point is measured, specific computations will ensue in the molar mass.

Vapor force per unit area osmometry is another method ; a known sum of a substance is dissolved into a dissolver, therefore the difference in vapor force per unit area is recorded2.

Procedure: Hirko, R. Chemistry 112L General Chemistry I Laboratory, 6th erectile dysfunction. ; bluedoor: Eden Prairie, MN, 2012 ; Experiment 6.


Table 1 shows three tests of vapor denseness reaction incorporating propanone. For each test, the mass of the flask, foil and gum elastic was foremost recorded. A force per unit area investigation and a temperature investigation were used to obtain the force per unit area and temperature severally. 2 milliliter of Acetone was added to a flask and the flask was placed inside the beaker incorporating the boiling H2O. Acetone was evaporated, the flask was let to chill done, so the flask incorporating the residuary propanone was measured. The difference between both multitudes was recorded. The volume of the flask is tantamount to the

Table 1. Acetone

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Mass flask, foil, and rubber band/g




Barometric force per unit area /torr




Water boiling T/ & A ; deg ; C




Mass flask, foil, and rubber band/g + residuary trial fluid/g




Residual trial fluid/g




Volume of the flask/ml




Molar mass / ( g/mol )




Mean molar mass/ ( g/mol )


Unertainty / ( g/mol )


volume of the gas, because the gas fills out the form of the container. The molar mass was found by the undermentioned equation: M=mRT/PV, m is the mass of residuary propanone, R is the gas invariable, T is the temperature invariable, P is the force per unit area changeless and V is volume of the gas. The molar mass was found for the three tests as shown in table 1. Therefore, the average molar mass was found to be 73.13 ± 22.3 g/mol compared to the known value of 58.08 g/mol, hence, giving a per centum mistake of 25.90 % .

1http: //

2http: //

Discussion: Molar mass was found to be 73.13 ± 22.3 g/mol compared to the known value of 58.08 g/mol, the ascertained mass was found to be more than the known value, giving a per centum mistake of 25 % , nevertheless, the ascertained mass still falls within the norm, because the uncertainness is ± 22.3 g/mol.

The molar mass consequences obtained within the three tests are 74.07 g/mol, 84.80 g/mol and 60.53 g/mol severally. These ascertained values are inconsistent, that is attributed to the usage of dropper to put the acetic acid in the flask, which varies within the three tests, i.e. despite the volume used is 2ml for all three tests, nevertheless, it is highly hard to obtain the exact same sum of concentration for each, hence, the consequences are inconsistent. On the other manus, the per centum of uncertainness compared to the determined molar mass is 30.5 % . This per centum is within outlooks because it makes the ascertained average molar mass value autumn within the norm of the known value.

Sing the force per unit area and temperature observed ; there is a straight relative correlativity between them, as the force per unit area increase the boiling point additions. During the tests, the force per unit area stayed comparatively changeless, with a bantam decrease/increase within each as shown in table 1, ensuing in a mean of 734.6. For that ground, the temperature did n’t fluctuate throughout the three tests, as a consequence the boiling point was reasonably changeless besides. This is attributed to the conditions in Brookings, if the force per unit area was high the values obtained would be altered, hence, even if it is indirect, there is a correlativity between the conditions and the boiling point. For case, if the same experiment was undergone in Santa Fe, New Mexico at an lift of 6344 foot, the boiling point will diminish, hence the molar mass will besides diminish. This is because at higher highs the force per unit area lessening, and as the force per unit area decrease the temperature of the H2O bath will besides diminish, therefore the boiling point will be lower giving to a lower molar mass.

If the dissolver was more polar the known value will increase depending on the addition of mutual opposition, in other words, the more polar the dissolver the higher the known value. This is because more polar substances have a higher boiling point due to dipole-dipole interactions between their molecules ; hence divergence from the known occurs.

Major beginnings of mistake are attributed to the setup non being wholly dry within every test ; this would change the mass of the flask measured, every bit good as the beaker used etc. This would do deficiency of consistence within the obtained consequences. The whole made in the center of the foil was non little and tight plenty, this will account for a faster rate of vaporization, therefore the mass of residuary propanone will increase, which means that the molar mass will be higher.

Potential betterments can be attributed to the usage of an enhanced temperature and force per unit area investigations, which would account for more dependable consequences, in add-on, if an setup is to be used once more it should be wholly dried out, to guarantee that accurate consequences are achieved.

Haven’t Found A Paper?

Let us create the best one for you! What is your topic?

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.

Eric from Graduateway Hi there, would you like to get an essay? What is your topic? Let me help you


Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get your custom essay sample

For Only $13.90/page