Thomas Paine and James Chalmers were two work forces with different thoughts and different social-political backgrounds. Chalmers was an American Landowner in Maryland while Paine was an Englishman who arrived from England to Pennsylvania with one intent in head: fade outing the English Monarchy in the English Colonies in America. Even though these two characters were established in America. their thoughts refering Democracy and Monarchy were different. Paine was in favour of the abolishment of the Monarchy through democracy with his statement about category differentiations and privileges. For illustration. he criticized the fact that the monarchy believed their power came straight from God. Chalmers was in favour of the Monarchy opinion in the Americas since he and his societal category were acquiring a batch of benefits by being tied to the British Crown. Paine thought that the English King was unworthy of holding power. and he thought that the English Constitution was oppressive. It is good understood that Paine came to the Americas with the thought of acquiring rid of the Monarchy by get downing a revolution in America. He would subsequently travel to France and assist them get down the Gallic Revolution.
Paine’s Common Sense led Chalmers to compose an essay refering the benefits of Monarchy in response to Paine’s challenge that anyone who believed there was a individual good ground to hold Monarchy in America should demo it. Chalmers claimed the English Constitution as the greatest defence of human rights known to adult male. since he was given the right to set down and slaves by subjecting to the English Crown. Paine had the opposing point of position about Monarchy. He believed that all work forces were born peers and hence familial power was undeserved. Another different point of position we encounter between these two characters is refering Commerce. Chalmers believed that by acquiring independency from the British. a failure in commercialism would ensue. Furthermore. a war between creditors and debitors would stop in a general abolishment of debts. However. Paine believed that commercialism would procure America peace and friendly relationship with Europe since it was Europe’s first involvement to hold America as a free port of trade.
Paine and Chalmers differed on their positions of American independency every bit good. Chalmers believed that American independency would merely ensue in another signifier of tyranny under Cromwell’s regulation. On the other manus. Paine believed that America would profit from independency because they would be at peace with other states such as France and Spain that could finally come in into war with Britain. Paine based his statement mostly on the thought that it was European dictatorship that drove Europeans to happen America appealing. For some British minds. the word “Democracy” was straight used for mentioning to the “House of Commons” unlike in the early American Revolution where the word “Democracy” was referred to as the greater equality inspired by the battle for independency.
Democracy did non be in the settlements before the Revolution because political position was straight related to wealth. Particular makings were supposed to be met in order to be eligible to vote or to be sitting in an assembly. A democracy is a signifier of authorities in which power is held by the people. In this signifier of authorities. people are able to elect their ain representatives. After the independency of America. the definition of democracy was that the power rested on the consent of the governed. and that there would be no King or Monarchy. Like Paine. Noah Webster believed in Equality when he stated that Equality was the really psyche of a democracy. The independency resulted in the formation of a Republic where the chief undertaking of the republican authorities was to advance the public well-being and non individual’s opportunism.
Plants Cited
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 152. Print.
Foner. Eric. Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History. Third Edition erectile dysfunction. Vol. One. New York: W. W. Norton & A ; . 2011. Print.
Foner. Eric. Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History. Third Edition erectile dysfunction. Vol. One. New York: W. W. Norton & A ; . 2011. Print.
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. Print.
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. NewYork: W. W. Norton. 2006. Print.
six Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 170. Print.
seven Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 170. Print.
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 120. Print.
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 176. Print.
Foner. Eric. Give Me Liberty! : An American History. Brief 3rd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton. 2006. 177. Print.
