The Second Amendment Essay
Few issues incite americans more than the issue of rising crime andviolence. This problem can easily be linked to the availability of guns.”Thedebate over whether guns are a hallowed tradition and a right guaranteed by theSecond Ammendment of the U.S.constitution or whether they are a fearful dangercontributing to crime and violence.” (“gun control”) Due to the outbreak ofviolence in our society, some people feel that repealing the Second Ammendmentwould solve the problem.
These people feel that repealing the Second Ammendmentwould solve the problem. These people feel that there are two reasons for therepeal; One is the rising of violence among teenagers, the second reason istheir interpertation of the Second Ammendment which could be considered a strictone. The side opposing these views use arguments like how it would beimmpossible to repeal the Second Ammendment, and a long western civilizationshistory with a right to bear arms. Finally one can see the conflict of viewsdealing with the Second Ammenment, but one would also see that repealing theammendment wouldn’t solve the problem facing our society.
The contriversy ofthis issue that has the potential to pulverise this country is why it is such agood topic to discuss, people should be better informed and make a decisionbased on fact and not fiction. Many advocates of thelimitations of guns can quote numerous examples of increasing violence andhomicide crimes. But the area which hits the closest to home is the issue ofviolence among the teenagers of our society. The years have changed on howstudents deal with their problems “Twenty-five or thirty years ago, when teenageboys got into a fight… it usually meant a fist fight. In more and moreneighborhoods… it now means a shoot out” (“Gun Control”320). Violence likethat is a major problem on our streets and even in our schools. Almosteverywhere now “youngsters are packing weapons, Some are involved in drugs organgs; others carry them for self-defense… One study says at least one inevery three male juveniles is armed”(Muller 2). Now more than ever before an”increasing number of children under the age of 18 arrested each year for murderhas jumped 55% in the past decade,… Juvenile arrests for aggravated assaultare rising dramatically” (Henkoff 2). The results of this rising trend inviolence has led to the release of a “center for disease center reports thatsince 1988, American teenage boys have been more likely to die from gunshotwounds than from… All other natural diseases” (“Gun Control” 83). This trendcan be the result of “the widespread of availability of firearms which makesit far too easy for kids to kill… Guns figure in more than 15% of adolescenthomicides… “There are more than 200 million privately owned guns in America”(Henkoff 7). With the violence of American youngsters rising at a stagering rate,we obviosly cannot sit and do nothing. Something must be done and gunlimitations through the repeal of the Second Ammendment is a good weopon in thiswar.The second reasonwhy a repeal of the Second Ammendment could be a good choice in limiting guns isthe original purpose of that ammendment. The ammendment “grew out of the deep-seated fear of a “National” or “standing army, originally they also limitedthe National Army to 840 men” (Burger 4). This idea led to the true reason forthe ammendment “the need for a state militia was the “right” guarenteed in theammendment In short, it was declared”neccesary” in order to have a statemilitary force to protect the security of the state” (Burger 6). The ammendmentissued the right of militia’s and for hunters which in that day depended ontheir guns for food. Now “Americans have a right to defend their homes, we neednot change that, nor does anyone question that the Constitution protects theright of hunters to hunt game. “Hunting is a sport for recreation but “machineguns are not recreational… and surely are in need of regulations as are motorvehicles” (Burger 7) Now Americans don’t fear fear a national army as they oncedid anyway. The “huge national defense establishment has taken over the role ofthe military of 200 years ago” Burger 4) and everybody seems to have delt withit. Therefore the security of a free dtate is protected by the nationalestablishment, this eliminates the need for military type weopons for a socalled defense.Those opposing the limitation of gun rights can easilyquote numerous examples why not to repeal the Second Ammendment. The NRA forexample uses the slipery slope until every weapon is accounted for even thoughthis is true “one of the major arguements against the theory that gun controlwould save lives is that…firearm controls could have no,real effect onhomicide rates because it is human nature, homicide would continue” (Henkoff 18).
murders would pick up the next best weapon. This explisifies that it would beimpossible for a repeal to be succesful. Also knowing that “an estimated100,000,000 guns now owned exceeds the annual incident count of 1,000,000 by afactor of 100, this means that existing stock of weapons could supply criminalsfor the next century even if used just once” (Wright,Ross, and Dailey 320). Nowwill a repeal limit this? Furthermore even if you got rid of all existing guns”it is after all, not much more dificult to manufacture servicable firearms inones home than to brew up a batch of homeade gin” (Wright,Ross, and Dailey 321).
This ability to manufacture underground weapons was seen before during theSoviet Unions war with Afghanistan. The “Afghanistan tribesmen used wood andmetal working equipment much like the equipment you can order in a searsmagazine, produced hand crafted rifles that fire the Russian AK-47 assault riflecartridge” (Wright,Ross, and Dailey 421). Can we expect less from Americans? Finally the overwhelming reason that the Second Ammendment shouldn’t berepealed is the long western civilazations history dealing with the right tokeep and bear arms. Ideologist supporting the right to bear arms can be tracedas far as “The Greek philosopher Aristole who thought the bearing of arms wasneccesary to true citizenship and participation in a political system” (“GunControl”120). Throughout the ages this theme was supported by keestores of ourcivilization like Prince Machiavelli, the Italian political philosopher,advocated and armed populations of citizens soldiers to keep head strong rulersin line. Then in English society the right to bear arms was insured, ” whenWilliam and Mary were invited to occupy the throne of England in 1687, they werepresented with an English bill of right. This bill included a specific right forEnglishmen to have Arms for defense” (“Gun Control”8), in fact if this right wasnot exersized during the Revolutionary War with England our constitution wouldnever have been written. In conclusion ” A well Regulated Militia, beingnecessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep andbear arms shall not be infringed.” (Amendment 2 of The United StatesConstitution). These are sacred words. It is obviousthat crime is a major problem in Today’s Society. Many steps have been taken asvoters demand that the government do something about the rising crime andviolence in America, but is repealing the Second Ammendment the Answer? No it isnot. We must think of the result of such a repeal, many people would not standfor it they would take arms to defend the very right being taken away. If theright to keep and bear arms had not been exercised when George Washington ledthe U.S. to victory over England, our Constitution would not exist, that is whythe Second Ammendment is such a sacred one, it is the basis for which the ideasof this country stand upon. Would people really sit idle as the Government takesaction to more obser to Tyranny? In addition to the Second Ammendment mostpeople are unaware that the 14th or Civil Rights Ammendment also guarantees theright of freedmen to bear arms. Do advocates against the Second Ammendmentsuggest that we repeal this ammendment too? Many Americans would not go for that.
Furthermore it is obvious that it would be impossible to repeal the SecondAmmendment there are otherways to deal with rising crime and violence. Obviouslymilitary type weapons should not be available to the public, they are designedwith one thing in mind, to kill people. There should also be limits on semi-automatic handguns because they are not even suitable for sport and it onlytakes one shot to warn off someone attaking you not 14 as many weapons can hold.
Even though steps must be taken to curb gun violence people must get moreinvolved with the system to insure that limits do not go too far. It is afterall the people who control politics, not politicians.
In conclusion the Constitution holds the basic rights for which weexercise each day. Our basic rights are guarenteed by the Constitution, and ifthey abolish the Second Ammendment we would not enjoy the result, no crime butat the cost of a police state. This is not America.