Get help now

Abortion: Take an Innocent Human Life

  • Pages 7
  • Words 1702
  • Views 820
  • dovnload



  • Pages 7
  • Words 1702
  • Views 820
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Abortion is the ending of pregnancy before birth and is morally wrong. An abortion

    results in the death of an embryo or a foetus. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless,

    innocent children and illegal in many countries. By aborting these unborn infants,

    humans are hurting themselves; they are not allowing themselves to meet these new

    identities and unique personalities. Abortion is very simply wrong. Everyone is raised

    knowing the difference between right and wrong. Murder is wrong, so why is not

    abortion? People argue that it is not murder if the child is unborn. Abortion is murder

    since the foetus being destroyed is living, breathing and moving. Why is it that if an

    infant is destroyed a month before the birth, there is no problem, but if killed a month

    after birth, this is inhumane murder?

    It is morally and strategically foolish, because we lose the middle when we talk about

    reproductive rights without reference to a larger moral and spiritual dimension, and we

    are unwilling to use language like transgression and redemption, or right and wrong.

    The main purpose abortions are immoral is how they are so viciously done. Everyday,

    innocent, harmless foetuses that could soon be laughing children are being brutally

    destroyed. One form of abortion is to cut the foetus into pieces with serrated forceps

    before being removed, piece by piece from the uterus by suction with a vacuum

    aspirator. Another form consists of bringing the foetus feet first into the birth canal,

    puncturing its skull with a sharp instrument and sucking out the brain tissue. The body

    parts, such as the head, are given letters, rather than refer to the parts as what they

    are. In my opinion this is for the doctors who cannot face the reality of what they are

    doing. The remains of the foetus or embryo, as the case may be, are put into

    everyday, plastic buckets and then sent to a dumpster where these precious bones

    and limbs are disposed. However, how and when an abortion takes place are matters of

    little importance to pro- abortionists and other defenders. Even former abortion

    practitioners from varying backgrounds and religions have a new view on abortion.

    These changes of heart were caused by psychological, religious and scientific reasons.

    One doctor, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, performed 60,000 abortions and supervised 10,000,

    before scientific evidence and the use of an ultrasound, convinced him he was

    promoting and participating what he now calls “the most atrocious holocaust in the

    history of the United States.” Other doctors refuse to perform legal abortions, saying

    they should save lives rather than destroy them.

    Many argue is it the women’s or the foetus’ rights and values that are being trampled

    on? “Pro-choice movements sometimes fall back on an abortion rhetoric that seems to

    dehumanize and trivialize the death of a foetus as a way to humanize and make

    important the reproductive rights of women.” (Wolf p54) “Women can treat an

    unwanted foetus as a violation of her civil rights and is therefor justified tin using force

    to expel it” (McMillan pA12) The decision is not up to the mother because she is not

    God. Only God, the ultimate creator has the right to choose who may live and who shall

    die. Humans do not have the right or the power to control the quality of life and to

    avoid suffering. “The issue of abortion is not just life, but how life is created and the

    extent to which human intention and control the process, both before and after birth.

    All humans inventions and interventions may give us a world to regret.” (Clark p3) With

    abortion, we humans give ourselves dominion over a large part of God’s plans and our

    Abortion becomes especially evil when the bond between mother and child is broken

    and it is being used as an alternative birth control when humans cannot control their

    irresponsible sexual hungers. If beings are responsible enough to be sexually active,

    they should also be responsible enough to accept consequences, and if that means

    becoming pregnant and creating a life, then that life should have the opportunity to

    live. There should be a bond or relationship between a mother and child, whether born

    Mothers and her children form a bond unlike any other felling of love; when a child is

    aborted, before given the right to grow in the bond, does the mother feel the

    connection with her child or is it just uterine material. Abortion is never about just

    abortion. It is about questions like whether the society at large, or individual pieces of

    it, regards the fact of women’s fertility as burden or gift, and how they treat it, and

    what are the incentives ad disincentives they provide? How the rearing of children is

    regarded – benefit or burden, or sometimes a balance of those, and who is responsible

    for that? And then one of the deepest things, at the core of what abortion is about, is

    what is our understanding of freedom? Is freedom something like will: the ability to

    choose something in anyway you choose, freedom without regard to truth, to what

    some would call natural law? Freedom without regard to the common good?”

    Many women do feel this bond and also feel a great loss and emptiness in their lives.

    Several women have confided in one author, Naomi Wolf. They have come to her in

    grief. One woman shared that each year she lights a candle for the foetus that she

    aborted, and that she feels like there is no room within the organized reproductive

    rights institutions or within mainstream feminism to articulate that grief and make it

    “All humans have the same right to live compared to other humans; whether rich, poor,

    majority or minority this being deserves the same chance we were all given.” (Clark p3)

    The Vatican teaches that all humans have a right to life, from the moment of

    conception until the natural ordained moment of death. According to the Catholic

    church, a person is living when as young as an embryo, which refers to an organism at

    its early stage of development, through the foetus stage, which is from the end of the

    eighth week until birth and when considered a baby, until the last second of life before

    death. It is also selfish to abort an unborn child. This aborted child could have been

    destined to create world peace, make the invention of the century, find a cure foe

    AIDS or other diseases or maybe have children of his or her own and continue our

    Pro-choice defenders feel that the Roman Catholic Church’s opinion leaves no room for

    human reason as it instead tries to unrealistically legislate an uncompromising pro-life

    policy. There is no excuse for having an abortion. Pro-choice followers recommend

    abortion if the child is a result of rape, a painful reminder, may be born defected or the

    female is too young and not ready to raise a child of her own and be a parent. If these

    are the cases, adoption agencies are found nationwide and willingly accept unwanted

    children giving them the opportunity to live with another family.

    There are many different viewpoints on abortion in the United States of America. Where

    most Americans do not feel that abortion is necessarily ‘good,’ they do believe it is a

    ‘right.’ Others have similar opinions. They embrace contradictory opinions and consider

    abortion a form of murder and yet still feel it should be legal for the truly desperate.

    However, most Americans think abortions are morally troubling. A recent study by

    George Hunt shows that neither age nor gender appears to have any effect on people’s

    Today, teenagers are getting mixed messages from parents, peers, and media. This is

    the reason for the increased birth rate. Abortion is being used as a method of birth

    control in this case which shows in a study in The Lancet magazine that 24.1% of

    teenagers aged seventeen through nineteen have undergone induced abortion.

    As the world grows with the new times we must look at these such important issues

    that will dramatically effect us soon enough in the future. Sixty million abortions are

    done yearly, and that number only increases as more and more countries legalize this

    brutal destroying of innocent children who could be successful world leaders.

    “What does it mean to choose life? Who chooses life? Where should the focus be on

    choosing life?” (Wilson p54) To choose life not only means to speak out against

    unnecessary death of humans but also to take care of one’s self, support the good

    mannerisms of all and to see good in all. The only being who has a say of life is God

    Almighty himself. However, we all have the opportunity and power to choose to live.

    The focus on choosing life should be on being happy. A complete life is a fulfilling and

    very satisfying life. It is up to us only to decide and teach others of these brutal acts

    done daily out of the laziness, irresponsibility, and ignorance of humans in attempt to

    escape from real life. Human life can not run forever and eventually, they will learn that

    destroying the innocent is wrong. “Pro- life movement will win, because when you hold

    up a picture of a six month old foetus being stabbed in the neck and all you say is

    ‘choice, choice, choice’ you are going to loose.” (Wolf p54)

    Alvare, Helen, Wilson, Marle, Wolf, Naomi. “Abortion: Whose Values? Whose Rights?”

    Tikkun January-February 1997: pp54-60

    Clark, Thomas. “Thou Shalt Not Play God” The Humanist July-August 1995: p3

    Hunt, George W.. “Of Many Things” America 31 January 1998: p2

    Lavelle, Marianne. “When Abortion Comes Late In Pregnancy, Though Rare, Most

    Aren’t For Medical Reasons” U.S. News and World Reports 19 January 1998: p31-32

    Lefevere, Patricia. “Ex-abortion Providers; Conversation Tales” National Catholic

    Merril, Ted. “Abortion; Extreme Views Ignore Reality” Medical Economics 15 July 1996:

    McMillan, Jeff. “Focusing On a Woman’s Right To Self Defense” The Chronicle of Higher

    “No Easy Quick Fix Solutions To Abortion Issues” National Catholic Reporter 8

    “Reproductive Tract Infections and Abortion Among Adolescent Girls In Rural Nigeria”

    Thomas, Judy. “Pro-life Turns Deadly” Newsweek 26 January 1998: p64

    Wallace, Bruce. “When One Fetus Lives and One Dies” Maclean’s 19 August 1996:

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Abortion: Take an Innocent Human Life. (2018, Jun 17). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy