There is a current debate about animal rights as they are not working correctly and no clear cause or solution can be identified. Both sides, advocates and opponents of animal rights, have a strong understanding of their viewpoints. What makes this discussion interesting is that supporters of animal rights have a stronger voice and more support. Nevertheless, the importance of animal rights remains unaffected.
Effective implementation of animal rights faces obstacles due to varying approaches and interpretations. It is crucial for individuals to reconsider their treatment of animals, recognizing the existence of both correct and incorrect methods. This acknowledgment highlights the challenge in fully embracing animal rights when they are understood differently. While numerous activists work towards preventing cruelty towards animals, there are also proponents advocating for more comprehensive measures in this domain.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) argues that inflicting harm on animals is inhumane due to their ability to feel pain. However, since humans are omnivorous, it is considered natural for us to consume animals as a source of sustenance. This conflicting stance poses challenges in forming a foundation for advocating animal rights.
Thesis: Animal rights are normative rules for animals. This paper presents an advanced solution to the pros and cons surrounding animal rights. To prevent people from being uninformed, suggestions are provided to address these pros and cons and offer a win-win solution for animal rights. Additionally, this paper proposes a better solution that benefits both animals and humans.
