We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Death Penalty, negative side a practicability speaker

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Practicability As the third speaker of the Negative team, I strongly oppose to this resolution, Resolved, That Death Penalty Be Restored in the Philippines. Why? Because Death Penalty deprives people the right to life. In Article II, Sectional of the 1987 Philippine Constitution states: “The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights”. The Commission on Human Rights has opposed the enactment of any law re-imposing the death penalty law In the

Philippines on the ground that It offends the diligently of human person and human rights.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Death Penalty, negative side a practicability speaker
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

The abolition of the death penalty by the 1987 Constitution was a very big step towards a practical recognition of the dignity of every human being created to the image and likeness of God, and of the value of human life from its conception to its natural end. Every human being has the inherent right to life and this right must be protected by law. However, this right is not as sacrosanct and Inviolable as it sounds.

The mall principle In human rights law Is that no-one shall be arbitrarily deprived of life. Amnesty International (www. Misinterpretation_org_ retrieved January 18, 2013) states, “The death penalty violates the right to life. ” Capital punishment contradicts our moral beliefs and claims of a fair and just government. This makes the death penalty our most fundamental human rights violation. It is the denial of the most basic human rights. The Illinois Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty www. Cad. Org retrieved January 15, 2013) states, “We don’t cut off the hands of thieves to protect property; we do not stone adulterers to stop adultery. We consider that barbaric. Yet we continue to take life as a means of protecting life. ” No person, government-affiliated or not, has the right to decide if another human is worthy or unworthy of life. Our natural rights as humans, which cannot be taken away by the government, include the right to life….

Cite this Death Penalty, negative side a practicability speaker

Death Penalty, negative side a practicability speaker. (2018, Jan 31). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/death-penalty-negative-side-a-practicability-speaker/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page