Should the Death Penalty Be Mandatory for People That Killed Other People?

Capital punishment is a controversial issue, with many countries and individuals. Arguments for and against capital punishment are based on moral, practical, religious, and emotional grounds. The most severe form of corporal punishment as it is requires the law to kill the offender. It has been banned in many countries, in the United States, an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reinstated and more and more states are using capital punishment for serious offenses such as murder.

People that are pro-death penalty argue that it scares criminals not to commit a capital crime; it improves the community by making sure that convicted criminals do not offend again, provides closure to surviving victims or loved ones, and is a just penalty for their crime. I believe that the death penalty is a great form of punishment, and should be used for all people that commit murder. Though, there are many people that do not grasp this punishment as a form of good. Many say that it is unjust, cheapens human life, and puts the government on the same level as the criminals themselves.

Academic anxiety?
Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task
Get your paper price

124 experts online

Capital punishment for any people is very shocking and hard to see that it is just because of certain reasons that many think makes the country seem barbaric and inhumane. If you look at history, the death penalty has been around for centuries. The bible even says that killing someone for killing someone is just. The death penalty is used in many other countries as well as the U. S. , like China, Iran, North Korea, and many more. I see the death penalty more like an eye for an eye form of punishment.

Like the bible says about the death penalty; you steal your hand is removed, and if you kill someone you lose your life. You take what has been taken from you; in this case it is life. That is not at any point putting the government on the same level as the criminals themselves. It is enforcing the criminal the same fashion as his or hers crime. Is it so inhumane for punishing someone the same as their crime they did in fact commit? It is our duty to get rid of murderers. I believe that in the U. S. most people do not see it that way; they see it as killing a person instead of punishing them.

Like killing them is avoiding the problem, instead of doing something about it. Although, killing a person for killing another person is more like getting rid of the problem all together. A murderer does not acknowledge the victim’s constitutional rights and they spit at the rights of the victim but we allow the murderer to hide behind the rights he spit at. In doing the death penalty you are protecting innocent people from murderers; instead of letting them live because of his rights that he does not own anymore.

A murderer does not have any rights. He takes the rights away from the person they kill, so we take his rights away. Studies have shown that with the temporary hold on executions, murder rates have risen. With the death penalty, murders go down. Most criminals would think twice before committing murder if they knew their own lives were at stake. The death penalty as intended by the law could actually reduce the number of violent murders by taking care of the repeat offenders as well as first count offenders.

Instead of letting a murderer live off the government, free of any bills. Do not have to worry bout food or shelter; the death penalty will help the debt of the U. S. The government spends a grand total of money on the prisons and jails across the country; on clothes for the inmate, food for the inmate, and maintenance for the jails and prisons. The prisons are filling up in such a rate that the U. S. cannot keep up. Instead of building more and more prisons that would take up space that we could use for buildings for businesses, and for more homes.

The death penalty will slow the rate of inmates in two ways: by killing them off, it will give more room for other inmates that are not on death row, and scare others to not perform a capital crime, by hearing and seeing others being punished by taking their live. In doing this, taxes that you pay everyday will be used for more productive things, than for food and shelter for a man or woman that killed someone else. Is it good or bad; Right or wrong? The way I see it in my eyes, it is helping America. Getting rid of sick people and making the U. S. a better place. Should someone be put to death for killing someone else? Absolutely.

This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

Order custom paper Without paying upfront

Should the Death Penalty Be Mandatory for People That Killed Other People?. (2018, Feb 26). Retrieved from