Details of the plan for EAP coursework:
Topic: Pros and Cons of Democracy Leadership Style
In this essay, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the democracy leadership style. Additionally, we will explain why it is considered the best way to manage firms in the contemporary business world.
1. Introduction:
In this paper, we will explore the role of leadership style in business management. Specifically, we will examine how different leadership styles impact organizational performance and employee satisfaction. Our thesis statement is that leadership style plays a crucial role in a business, and that a democratic leadership style is often considered the most efficient for management.
Content:
According to Dr. Stephen R. Covey, Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.” This quote highlights the importance of leadership in determining the direction and goals of a business. Leadership style plays a crucial role in achieving success, as it can influence employee motivation, productivity, and overall company culture.
The Variations of Leadership Style
Conclusion:
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of the democratic leadership style and explain why it is the best way to manage firms in the contemporary business world.
2. Main Body:
There are several advantages to the democratic leadership style, including improved communication and motivation.
Improved communication is one aspect of this style. By involving team members in decision-making processes, leaders can gain valuable insights and ideas from their team. This leads to better communication between leaders and team members, as well as among team members themselves.
Motivation is another important aspect of democratic leadership. When employees feel that their opinions matter and that they have a say in how things are done, they are more likely to be motivated and engaged in their work. This can lead to increased productivity, job satisfaction, and overall success for the organization.
Thesis Statement 1: Communication between employees and managers directly affects decision-making and work efficiency.
Content 1:
The task is passed down from the managers at the top of the hierarchy to the ground-level workers through communication. Problems and feedback are passed up from the bottom to the top. A democratic leadership style will allow workers to express their feelings and thoughts about their job to their managers. This can help meet employees’ needs and wants, which can increase motivation and prevent disputes between the firm and employees. Feedback from subordinates may also help managers identify potential problems in production or decision-making, enabling them to fix these issues promptly.
Thesis statement 2: Communication and leadership are non-financial factors that affect employee motivation, leading to significant impacts on productivity and efficiency.
Content 2:
- Two-way communication can help managers satisfy employees and provide guidance to help with their tasks.
- Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs can also be used as a framework for understanding the importance of communication in meeting employee needs.
Democratic leaders may assign responsibilities to their subordinates and empower them to make their own decisions in completing a task. This approach allows for flexibility, recognition of achievement, and the realization of full potential, rather than simply delegating a fixed task without any room for creativity or growth.
Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership Style:
Thesis statement: Despite all the advantages of democratic leadership style, there are some restrictions and drawbacks.
The democratic leadership style is not always feasible or effective in all situations.
For example, in order to maximize production during difficult times such as an economic crisis, a business may owe too much money to its suppliers.
Democratic leadership requires trust between managers and employees, but it may also incur some problems or even vital errors in the business due to the lack of experience. Additionally, it can be time-consuming.
Why is the democratic leadership style effective as a whole?
Thesis statement: It has been the key reason for many firms’ unparalleled success.
One example of this success can be seen in famous firms such as Microsoft and Pixar Animation Studios.
Another reason why democratic leadership style is effective is that the workforce is generally well-trained nowadays. They deserve and ask for more freedom in making adjustments and changes to their tasks.
3. Conclusion:
After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of various leadership styles, it can be concluded that democratic leadership style is the most effective in today’s business world. This style enhances communication, motivates employees, and helps them reach their full potential. However, it should be noted that this approach requires highly skilled employees and may be time-consuming.
The democratic leadership style is considered the most effective approach in today’s business world.
Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall,” said Dr. Stephen Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. He emphasized the importance of leadership in the business world. In fact, leadership style plays a crucial role in business, referring to the art of making subordinates work efficiently towards a mutual goal that benefits both the firm and its employees.
Leadership styles vary in business, but in contemporary democratic societies, it is commonly believed that a democratic leadership style is most effective for management. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of democratic leadership style and explain why it is best suited for managing firms in today’s business world.
The Democratic leadership style is based on the idea of democracy in managing employees. This approach can benefit both firms and employees in many ways, including improved communication, motivation, and efficiency of production within the business (Democratic Leadership Style, n.d.).
Firstly, communication between employees and managers directly affects decision-making and work efficiency (Stimpson and Farquharson, 2012). Tasks are passed down from managers at the top of the hierarchy to ground-level workers through communication. Problems and feedback are then passed in reverse order from the bottom to the top. Efficient communication is thus essential for business success.
The democratic leadership style allows workers to express their feelings and thoughts about their job to their managers. This two-way communication helps managers become aware of problems, expectations, and needs that must be met for employees to work contently and efficiently. Employees are less likely to be ignored under this leadership style compared to autocratic leadership where decisions are made solely by the managers. Meeting the needs and wants of employees can increase motivation and prevent disputes between the firm and employees (Kendra Cherry, 2012). Additionally, feedback from subordinates can help managers identify potential production or decision-making problems so they can be fixed appropriately.
Communication and leadership are non-financial factors that affect employee motivation, which has a great impact on productivity and efficiency (Stimpson and Farquharson, 2012). Democratic leadership that encourages two-way communication can help managers satisfy employees and provide guidance to help them with their tasks. This creates a sense of belonging for employees in the firm, as well as a friendly atmosphere in the workplace. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs, this satisfies the third level of social needs.
Moreover, democratic leaders may delegate responsibilities to subordinates and authorize them to make their own decisions in tasks instead of just delegating fixed tasks for them to finish without any flexibility. This helps employees feel responsible about their task so they will not reach full utility by just completing it but also brainstorming ideas to improve results. As a result of democratic leadership, productivity and production quality would be improved.
Furthermore, when tasks are finished based on not only manager ideas but also inputs from employees, they will feel recognition for achievement which may gradually realize their full potential nearing the top levels of Maslow’s hierarchy: esteem needs and self-actualization.
When employees’ needs are satisfied and they feel confident, their performance improves, resulting in better quality and efficiency for the business. However, despite the advantages of a democratic leadership style, there are restrictions and drawbacks. There are times when businesses need to maximize production – for example, when they need to produce output quickly or follow orders without questioning during hard times such as economic crises (Stimpson and Farquharson, 2012). In these situations where obedience is required, democratic leadership is not suitable. Additionally, enforcing democratic leadership requires trust between managers and employees; employees must be trusted with responsibility and freedom to make choices.
It is important to note that employees must be well-practiced, skillful, and familiar with their work. Otherwise, democracy may result in problems or even vital errors in the business due to decisions made without sufficient experience (Kendra Cherry, 2012). Additionally, communication between managers and employees can be time-consuming when considering the benefits or thoughts of each individual. This is especially true in businesses with a tall organizational structure where there are many levels of authority between the chief and ground-level workers. In such cases, democratic leadership may not contribute to productivity or efficiency (Kendra Cherry, 2012).
In the contemporary business world, the democratic leadership style is widely utilized and has been a key reason for many firms’ unparalleled success in their fields of business. Examples include Microsoft and Pixar Animation Studios (Adrien-Luc Sanders, 2012), despite its limitations. Another reason for the effectiveness of democratic leadership style is that today’s labor force is generally well-trained and educated with basic knowledge of their work. This makes them unlikely to make terrible mistakes that could damage the business, and they deserve more freedom in making adjustments and changes to their tasks. This increased autonomy can make them more creative and motivated.
To sum up, the democratic leadership style is the most effective leadership style in today’s business world. It improves communication, motivates employees, and helps them fulfill their potentials. However, it does have some drawbacks such as high requirements for employees and being time-consuming.
Reference:
1. Books:
Stimpson, P. and Farquarson, A. (2012). Business Studies 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Websites:
Adrien Sanders (2012) from Pixar Animation Studios was the source of this information. It was accessed on May 7, 2013, through About.com. The information is available from:
Author unknown (2012). Democratic Leadership Style.” Speedupcareer. Accessed on May 7, 2013. Available from:
Kendra Cherry, a writer for About.com, explains the concept of Democratic Leadership. Her article is accessible through the website and was last accessed on May 7th, 2013.
