Many states in the Eastern Hemisphere unrecorded really good and have high incomes. They have strong industries and skilled workers and are rich in resources. The authorities of these states take attention of the unemployed, the old, the sick and the hapless. They provide wellness attention, holidaies and kid attention. Education is strongly respected and engineering is high.
But, so in the continents of Asia and Africa you have merely the opposite. There is poorness, dearth, and illness. Population is high and resources are hapless. Most people are husband mans and farm hardly plenty to feed themselves and their household. Industries are scarce and fundamentally home-based. Transportation system is non good developed except for waterways. These states have hapless agribusiness and a hapless educational system. Illiteracy is high. So, we can see that the states of the Eastern Hemisphere have a wide scope of different criterions of life. This is so unjust and imbalanced. I think that there is no economic justness in the Eastern Hemisphere today because there is such a difference in the criterion of life between the states of Europe, Africa, and Asia.
We can measure the criterion of life by looking at many different factors. Are the resources that are available scarce or plentiful? Are the resources renewable or non-renewable? Is the economic system traditional, socialist, communist, bid or capitalist? How large is the state and how big is the population ( population denseness ) , and how fast does it turn? How long is the life anticipation? What is the literacy rate ( how many people can read and compose ) ? What is the gross domestic merchandise ( GDP ) or the value of all goods and services.
What is the per capita income ( GDP divided by population ) ? Does the state develop and have new engineering? Does the authorities take attention of its people? Is there wellness attention, kid attention, and elder attention? Is there a transit system?
In the more developed state like Sweden and England in Europe or Japan in Asia, the factors that we look at to measure the criterion of life shows that there’s a high literacy rate, high per capita income, high life anticipation, high engineering, low population growing, and a by and large high rate of quality of life ( human development index or HDI ) .
In a less developed state such as India, China, and Bangladesh in Asia, Russia in Europe, and Nigeria and Somalia in Africa, the factors that we look at to measure the criterion of life shows that there’s a low life anticipation, a low literacy rate, a turning population, a low per capita income, a high population denseness, and a by and large low HDI. The economic system of a less developed state is normally a traditional economic system. New engineering is scarce. Transportation system systems are hapless. The authorities doesn’t do much to assist their people.
In decision, I feel that since so much of the land country of the Eastern Hemisphere is taken up by hapless states like China, Russia, Africa, India and Bangladesh, who all have a reasonably low criterion of life, that there is an unfairness in that hemisphere. Because, on the other manus you have states like England, Sweden, Japan and Australia who have a high criterion of life. It seems so unjust that so much land and so many people don’t have the resources and engineering to better their criterion of life. There decidedly is economic unfairness in the Eastern Hemisphere.
