Examining The Schinkels Altes Museum Architecture Analysis

Table of Content

In the late 1790s, several influencial members of the Prussian authorities requested that a museum was to be built to house the royal aggregation that would represent a valuable part to the province ‘s cultural mission. Due to fight with Napoleon and Prussia ‘s licking in 1806 with triumph in 1813 at Leipzig, the undertaking was delayed until 1822, when Architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel took on the undertaking.

The Altes Museum was built between 1823 and 1830. It is one of the most of import plants in the architecture of Classicism. It has a limpidly ordered outside and an interior construction of great preciseness after the Ancient Greek manner, Schinkel pursued Humboldt ‘s thought of the museum as an educational establishment unfastened to the populace.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

The Altes museum was originally built to house all of Berlin ‘s art aggregations, it has accommodated the Collection of Classical Antiquities since 1904. Between 1943 and 1945 the edifice was badly damaged by fire. Reconstruction work continued up until 1966. Since 1998 the Collection of Classical Antiquities has displayed its Grecian aggregation, including the exchequer on the land floor of the Altes Museum. The Egyptian Museum has, since August 2005, shown its aggregation on the upper floor where it will stay until it moves to the Neues Museum in 2009.

Karl Friedrich Schinkel was associated with taking poets, philosophers, and solons of his twenty-four hours. Some of their treatments involved aesthetics and the intent of art, which did more than influence him passively. He sought to use such theories to his architectural work.A

The Altes Museum was intended to be merely an extension of the Royal Academy, but Schinkel insisted he wanted it to be an independent edifice sited at the northern terminal of the Lustgarten, opposite the palace.A

In order for this to happen, because of the edifice ‘s intended size, a canal had to be filled in and a figure of smaller edifices were removed to do manner for the museum.A It has been sited to confront the castle and infixing it between the River Spree and a figure of smaller edifices allowed him to suit the undertaking ‘s non so generous budget. Since merely the museum ‘s frontage needed ornamentation worthy of such an high neighbour as the castle, the Konigliches Schloss.

The museum was located on axis with the castle and was next to the cathedral and arsenal, giving it a cardinal topographic point among these three pillars of the Prussian province. It was to go a brilliant icon of it ‘s clip.

The museum ‘s dealingss with the province merely went so far, with the frontage, significantly, bore an lettering admiting the male monarch ‘s prima cultural function, although the museum was in no sense an extension of the tribunal or an look of royal power.A The frontage may hold bore the male monarch ‘s name, but the edifice ‘s inside was to belong to art and its public. ”

The Alter Museum appears a monumental chef-d’oeuvre on the exterior, but non much can be said for it ‘s interior. It is preserved by recognizing the tribunal ‘s function in the cultural life of Prussian society, while at the same time forbiding this recognition of power from impacting the museum ‘s internal logic.A

The edifice presents us with one face to the outside, while showing another on the interior, evocative to the Janus symbol of one caput with two faces, a double-edged blade, or the opposite sides of a coin.

Schinkel ‘s museum efforts to propose how art is connected to the universe socially, culturally, and morally, within the context of the “ three pillars of Prussian society, ” as symbolised by the castle, arsenal, and cathedral. In the Altes Museum, it is impossible to disregard the edifice ‘s usage of architectural signifiers traditionally reserved for spiritual buildings.A The land floor ‘s centre is called the rotunda, which is a direct mention to the Pantheon every bit good as the Museo Pio Clementino.A

Art history and Aesthetics developed at the same time over the class of the eighteenth century. These formed the hierarchy for the Altes Museum.

The land floor housed art from the ancient universe, and the 2nd floor contained pictures by period and style.A Classical art was non arranged in any peculiar order, but was presented as one entity, it was non considered as another “ period, ” although they were carefully arranged harmonizing to the modern-day principles of art history. This differentiation between classical and postclassical, assumes that classical art is dateless, ideal and foundational.

The monumental order of the 18 fluted ionic columns, the broad stretch of the atrium, and the rotunda is an expressed mention to the pantheon in Rome, and eventually the expansive stairway which are all architectural elements where up to this point, were reserved for baronial edifices.

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York

( 1956-59 )

Frank Lloyd Wright has described the design of this edifice in a figure of letters to it ‘s laminitis, Solomon R. Guggenheim, and in several statements made during the clip of it ‘s design and building. Both Wright and Guggenheim died before they could see the museum completed. This peculiar museum is in a category of it ‘s ain. Featured in a figure of celebrated Hollywood movies for it ‘s celebrated degrees of circulation in a coiling signifier.

This peculiar distinctive edifice was Frank Lloyd Wright ‘s last major work. From the street, the edifice looks about like a white thread curled into a cylindrical stack, it is somewhat wider at the top than the underside. It ‘s visual aspect is in crisp contrast to the more typically boxlike Manhattan edifices that surround it.

Internally, the sing gallery forms a soft coiling spiral from the chief degree up to the top of the edifice. Paintings are displayed along the walls of the spiral and besides in exhibition infinite found at extension degrees along the way.This museum can be described as clean beautiful surfaces throughout the edifice, all attractively proportioned to human graduated table. These surfaces are all lighted from above with natural daytime beaming down into the chief anteroom. A characteristic that many historic museums lacked in old times and failed to carry through so good.

This Museum seems to hold an ambiance of harmonious simpleness where human proportions are maintained in relation to the image or painting on show. There is a fluid quiet created by the edifice ‘s inside where the new picture will be seen for itself under it ‘s favorable conditions, non conflicting with the edifice ‘s interior doing it the centre piece of attending.

The pictures are all situated in absolutely air conditioned Chamberss, indispensable to the saving of these great pieces of art and sculptures. The walls of the Solomon R Guggenheim Museum and infinites, inside and outside, are one in substance and consequence. The walls slant gently outward organizing a elephantine spiral for a well defined purpose. One can see this as a new integrity between perceiver, picture and architecture.

The images are inclined, faced somewhat upward to the spectator and to the visible radiation in agreement with the upward expanse of the spiral, the pictures themselves are emphasised as characteristics in themselves and are non hung ‘square ‘ but gracefully give to motion as set up by these somewhat swerving monolithic walls. In a great upward expanse of motion the image is seen framed as a characteristic of architecture.

The level plane of the image detached by the curve of the wall is presented to see much as a gem set as a signet ring. Precious as itself, unique in it ‘s individuality. Slightly atilt swerving off of the walls against which the images are placed non merely presents no trouble but facilitates sing, the broad curvature of the chief walls is a positive plus to the picture.

The soft upward, or downward, expanse of the chief spiral-ramp itself serves to do visitants more comfy by their very descent along the spiral, sing the assorted exhibits. The lift is making the lifting, the visitant the drifting from bay to alcove. The diameter of the coiling additions as it ascends so that the deepness of the Chamberss is as a consequence greater at the upper degrees. The dividers between the Chamberss act as bearing walls.

Criticism of the edifice has focused on the thought or given that it overshadows the graphicss displayed within, and the evident trouble to decently hang pictures in the shallow windowless exhibition niches that surround the cardinal spiral. Despite the rotunda liberally being lit by the big fanlight, the niches are to a great extent shadowed by the paseo itself, go forthing the art to be lit mostly by unreal lighting.

The walls of these niches are neither perpendicular nor level with most being gently concave, intending that canvasses are being mounted proud of the wall ‘s surface. Limited infinite within the niches mean that sculptures are by and large relegated to plinths amid the chief spiral paseo itself. Prior to the Museum ‘s Grand Opening, 21 creative persons, including Willem de Kooning and Robert Motherwell, signed a missive protesting the show of their work in such a infinite. Although there was unfavorable judgment towards Frank Lloyd Wright ‘s design of the Museum, it was deemed controversial. There were besides fans of his design who admired and cherised the museum for what it was.

“ Wright ‘s great swansong, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum of New York, is a gift of pure architecture – or instead of sculpture. It is a uninterrupted spacial spiral, a round incline that expands as it coils vertiginously around an unobstructed well of infinite capped by a flat-ribbed glass dome. A seamless concept, the edifice evoked for Wright, the quiet unbroken moving ridge. ” Spiro Kostof. A History of Architecture, Settings and Rituals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. p740.

“ Entering into the spirit of this inside, you will detect the best possible ambiance in which to demo all right pictures or listen to music. It is this ambiance that seems to me most missing in our art galleries, museums, music halls and theatres. ” Frank Lloyd Wright. “ Frank Lloyd Wright ” , The Architectural Forum, January, 1948, Vol 88 Number 1. p89.

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum has become a cultural icon and can be seen widely throughout popular civilization. It is featured in Matthew Barney ‘s The Cremaster Cycle, Bye Bye Birdie, Men in Black, When in Rome, Downtown 81, and conspicuously in The International, where a major gunfight occurs in the museum. In fact a life size reproduction of the museum was built for this scene. The New Yorker magazine has included the museum multiple times on its screen and in assorted sketchs.

Berlin ‘s Judisches Museum ( Jewish Museum ) September 2001

In one of the universe ‘s biggest race murder ‘s of all time earlier seen in history, WWII was a dark unstable epoch. From the German Nazi cantonments to the gas Chamberss of a really inexorable universe, human existences were being cattled like animate beings from cantonment to bivouac, starved plenty to decease from hungriness due to miss of nutrient and H2O or forced into the Chamberss of decease, merely to be suffocated by the belief of a Nazi dictator, Adolf Hitler. This was the Judaic Genocide.

Berlin ‘s Judisches Museum ( Jewish Museum is housed in a singular modern edifice designed by Daniel Libeskind. The museum was opened in September 2001. Some say it was shaped a spot like the Star of David and incorporating eccentric angles to symbolize the Holocaust, the Judisches Museum is the largest and most alone Judaic museum in Europe. It takes you back in clip directing a iciness down your spinal column giving you a sense of what truly happened back so in the holocaust.

The fortunes of the museum ‘s foundation and the aggregations it is based on, the people who have directed its development can be found here every bit good as personalities of public life who are dedicated to the intercultural apprehension of the Jewish Museum ‘s and pHYPERLINK “ http: //www.jmberlin.de/main/EN/04-About-The-Museum/05-Prize-UT/00-award_ceremony.php ” rize for apprehension and tolerance.

Like in any other new construction built whether it being a church, museum, infirmary or place, legion positions and sentiments where expressed in relation to the Jewish Museum in Berlin. Visitors had seen Libeskind ‘s new edifice as either a “ dramatic ” or ” normal ” museum. It was recognised as a deconstructivist chef-d’oeuvre, a groundbreaking creative activity, with it ‘s intellectuality in the signifier of a house, or even an exhibit in its ain right. Daniel Libeskind placed great accent on people ‘s perceptual experiences of the edifice and these are formed twenty-four hours after twenty-four hours.

The museum ‘s modern architectural elements of the Libeskind edifice comprise of the zincA frontage, the Garden of Exile, the three Axes of the German-Jewish experience, and the Voids. Together these pieces form a ocular and spacial linguistic communication rich with history and symbolism. Not merely do they house the museum with it ‘s exhibits, but they besides provide visitants with their ain alone experience as they walk through the infinites, taking them back in clip about like a clip capsule, being able to understand what the museum is seeking to portray and what narrative it is seeking to state.

The new edifice of the museum is best described as Zig-zag. The design is based on two additive constructions which when combined, organize the organic structure of the edifice. The first line is a weaving one with several cricks while the 2nd line cuts through the whole edifice. At the intersections of these lines, there are empty infinites otherwise known as “ Voids ” . These nothingnesss rise vertically from the land floor of the edifice up to the roof. Daniel Libeskind imagines the continuance of both lines throughout the metropolis of Berlin and beyond. Almost like a destructive train line going through Europe non cognizing where it ‘s traveling to stop up.

“ An irrational and unseeable matrix ” ( Daniel Libeskind, 1995 )

The frontage of the Jewish museum hardly enables a decision to be drawn in respects to the edifice ‘s inside. Neither degrees nor suites become evident to the perceiver. The placement of the Windowss are chiefly narrow slits that follow a precise matrix. They are besides based on a web of connexions. During the design procedure, designer, Daniel Libeskind plotted the references of outstanding Jewish and German citizens on a map of pre-war Berlin and joined the points to organize an “ irrational and unseeable matrix ” in which he based the linguistic communication of signifier, geometry and the form of the edifice.

The New Building is coated in Zn, a stuff that has a long tradition in Berlin ‘s architectural history. It consists of untreated metal and Ti with Zn that will oxidise and alter colour through exposure to visible radiation and conditions over the old ages.

A Void “ is non truly a museum infinite. ” ( Daniel Libeskind, 1999 )

Voids represent a cardinal structural component in the New Building and organize the connexion to the Old Building. In the Old Building, there is a stairway that leads down to the cellar through a Void of bare concrete which joins the two edifices together.

Five nothingnesss run vertically through the New Building. They have walls of bare concrete, they are non heated or air-conditioned and besides barely any unreal visible radiation, they are rather separate from the remainder of the edifice. The upper degrees of the exhibition, the Voids are clearly seeable with black exterior walls.

The Museum ‘s Voids refer to “ that which can ne’er be exhibited when it comes to Judaic Berlin history: Humanity reduced to ashes. ” ( Daniel Libeskind, 2000 )

In the museum there are besides belowground passageways that link the Old Building with the Libeskind Building. These passageways have no official entryway. There is a way system as you pass by the great nothingness made of three axes symbolizing three worlds in the history of German Jews.

The first and longest of these axes is the “ Axis of Continuity. ” This axes connects the Old Building with the chief stairway otherwise known as the Sackler Staircase which leads up to the exhibition degrees. Daniel Libeskind describes the Axis of Continuity as a continuance of Berlin ‘s history, it is the linking way from which the other two axes branch off.

The Garden of Exile attempts “ to wholly disorient the visitant. It represents a shipwreck of history. ” ( Daniel Libeskind, 1999 )

The second of the axis is the “ Axis of Emigration ” which leads outside to daylight and to the Garden of Exile. On the journey to this great garden, the museum walls are somewhat slanted and near into eachother, about symbolizing a way of devastation that plagued the yesteryear of German history. The floor is uneven and ascends bit by bit. A heavy door must be opened before the important measure into the garden can be taken. Almost a portraiture in contending your manner through snake pit to acquire to heaven, doing the jouney that worth while. Or is it?

The Garden of Exile is reached after go forthing the axes. The whole garden is on a 12A° gradient and disorients visitants, giving them a sense of the entire instability and deficiency of orientation which was experienced by those who were driven out of Germany. Russian willow oak that grew on top of pillars in the garden symbolised hope.

The 3rd of axis ‘s is the “ Axis of the Holocaust ” which is fundamentally a dead terminal. This axis becomes narrower and darker and ends at the Holocaust Tower. Glass instances on the manner show paperss and personal ownerships devulging to the private and public life of their proprietors who were killed. These three resistance axes symbolise the connexion between the three worlds of Judaic life in Germany.

The new Glass Courtyard at the Jewish Museum in Berlin was built from a design titled “ Sukkah ” which is Hebrew for thatched booth, by Daniel Libeskind. This glass courtyard is the 2nd extension to the museum. The construction itself consists characteristics of the New Building with its glistening Ag frontage and the Old Building, it is a successful synthesis of old and new. This combination is strengthened by the farther add-on of the Glass Courtyard to the ensemble. The visible radiation flooded Glass Courtyard has its ain typical feel. While the Libeskind Building ‘s zigzag signifier is a metaphorical mention to devastation of German-Jewish history, theA Sukkah subject is one of societal assemblage appropriate for a courtyard.

There is besides the new glass roof that covers the U-shaped courtyard at approximately 670mA? in size. It is supported by four freestanding packages of steel pillars. It portrayed the construction of a tree which was the chief inspiration for making the back uping pillars, which extend into the roof organizing a steel web.

The integrating of the Glass Courtyard with the bing Old Building posed an architectonic challenge. This glass building does non outplay the Old Building, the landmarked Collegienhaus which was erected in 1735, in graduated table and visual aspect bases proud an independent to the new edifice.

The Glass Hall was a complex edifice undertaking, interelating the old museum with the new Jewish museum. It was deemed unconventional for both building and stuffs used. Due to the expressive and asymmetrical geometry in Libeskind ‘s design, it presented enornmous challenges to those involved in the building procedure, such as the structural applied scientists and facade contrivers involved.

Steel being used for such a undertaking was besides really unusual to them every bit good. They were used to steel that usually supported building with right-angled or curving geometry. In the Glass Courtyard it formed subdivisions and crowns. Almost like painting image out of steel.

Metal metal steel, out of all stuffs used, demonstrated one of the most unconventional utilizations of steel in modern-day architecture. Four ramifying steel packages each consisted of three steel pillars with the unsmooth estimated diameter of a tree. Their map is chiefly inactive, besides in the instance of fire, they contain media overseas telegrams within, offering some protection to the overseas telegrams. The roof girders were assembled and bolted together onsite at the edifice site at roof tallness. The weight of the pillars weighed up to six dozenss each and the roof girder subdivisions weighed up to eight dozenss each, a Crane had to be formed that withstood a bearing capacity of 200 dozenss necessary.

The Glass Courtyard now provides the museum with infinite for a assortment of events, such as educational workshops, concerts, theatrical public presentations, and responses for up to five 100 people.

It besides serves to widen the museum ‘s entryway country and thereby improves the ordinance of visitant flow and circulation.The new room is located a few stairss manner from the chief entryway and it ‘s bing substructure. It includes cloakrooms, ticket counters, and the museum eating house. To day of the month over four million people have visited the Jewish Museum. It is good cognize for it ‘s diverse cultural and educational plans. The Glass Courtyard provides a suited and architecturally appealing solution, which will enable this vivacious development of the museum to go on in the hereafter.

In decision the Altes Museum is a typical illustration of classical architecture which day of the month back from Ancient Greece and the Rome Empire. It signifies a sense of formality and power amongst the people of it ‘s clip. Royalty and size of constructions were more common in those times instead so cleverly designed constructions that could accomplish the same intent.

Such constructions such as the Guggenheim Museum in New York, although really big in graduated table, it was a edifice designed after the bend of the century, that sparked contention and incredulity that something of that graduated table and frontage could be built in a engorged metropolis environment. It was considered fantasy instead so a world. It was built and it achieved the same intent as the Altes Museum in Berlin, but it was designed better and more smartly integrating the usage of natural visible radiation throughout the whole construction and the usage of “ continuity ” in circulation, which made the design one of the universe ‘s most outstanding edifices.

Following on from such a brilliant construction in New York, we come back to Berlin, where Berlin followed a similar attack in redesigning and widening New Jewish Museum. No 1 of all time thought that something of so important in history could be reinvented in a manner where it takes people back in clip to the injury and hurting of Nazi Germany. This museum was created in such a manner that it wholly blew away the traditional attack of a museum. The edifice ‘s particular characteristics that include gyrating walls, inclining floors, a windowless Holocaust Tower, and symbolic lines of Windowss that resemble lesions. When it comes to the Holocaust, a design attack such as this one, executed absolutely, can non come up, near and personal as this singular museum. A

Cite this page

Examining The Schinkels Altes Museum Architecture Analysis. (2016, Dec 06). Retrieved from


Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront