Multiculturalism was a function of different variety of culture together with languages, principles, customs and other practices inside the structure of social equity, harmony and diplomacy and sustainability. In the midst of change, prejudice and narrow-mindedness which frequently build a multicultural society. Mrs. Markandaya’s The Golden Honeycomb explored the various cultural diversity that applied to the demographic framework of a specific location, normally at the extent of institutions such as school, trade, neighbourhood, city or nation.
From this background, Multiculturalism was supporting the social order that widen impartial status to specific ethnic and religious factions, with no particular ethnical or spiritual tradition considered as a solitary rule to which everyone has to stick on to. Many researchers investigated the theory of Multiculturalism specifically in academia and the media remained conversial cultural measures.
As designated by numerous researchers, India is the most socially, phonetically and hereditarily differing geographical element after the Asian continent. India’s independent republic is prefaced on a national confidence in pluralism, not the standard patriot incantation of a mutual history, a solitary language and an assimilationist culture. State limits in India are generally drawn on linguistic line.In fact, this multiculturalism was the most essential component of the awareness of every educated Indian. But the character Rabi played the most striking in the novel was the fact that multiculturalism forms the matrix of her vision.
Rabi achieved the irrigation project, understanding that his own predetermination lied in his duty and administration to his kin; “Rabi tent is also contrived with some skill to take cognizance of his irregu status without undue emphasis. A standard flies, but the device is decorative and without significance. The furnishings are rich, but devoid of ciphers and symbols. Sentries are present, and spring to attention, but do not present arms. If Rabi is entranced by his quarters it is less to do with them than the manner in which they match his pure imaginings. How nice it would be, he continues dreamily, if all one’s wishes came true”.(178 &179)
Britishers guided our country for hundreds of years and during their rule, they urbanized our country rationally and tecnologically. Science sophisticated and materialistic chat were given citizens to carry on with an pleasurable life. The Britishers were basically intense on extending their field. They shaped the new technique for it and made the Indian leaders appliance in their prepared diversion of expansion of their territory.
Mrs.Markandaya has delineated in her present novel this issue between the Britishers and the Indians sensibly performing it, exhibiting it in an anecdotal frame. ‘The Golden Huneycontb’ affirms A.V. Krishna Rao, ‘clearly and decisively establishes Kamala Markandaya’s reputation as a most leading novelist in English today.
This novel is not only her best imaginative effort to project the development of national consciousness, but also her most ambitious and brilliant work of art of multicuralism. It reveals at once her extraordinary sense of conscious realism and historicity, unmatched in Indo-English fiction, and only rarely evident in contemporary British fiction’.’
Rabi’s part helps the reader of the resolute soul who constantly expanded their ethical and fabric support to Mahatma Gandhi for the freedom of the our land from the holds of strangers. His nationalistic desire makes an enlightening among the people.As the result of new age, Rabi is overpowered with the spirit of arousing and emancipation. It is his youthful enthusiasm that is well-directed towards determining the national fate. Through the character of Rabi, the writer demonstrates how they shaped individual lives and national reason with a more noteworthy affectability, mindfulness and feeling of responsibility.
“Bawajiraj has declared it a disaster, but the son is becoming cagey where his father is concerned. He does not answer, because he is being asked for a judgement, he suspects, before he is in possession of facts that are in reality beyond him. Although they exit, he is convinced, only there is this impediment. Exactly what, he does not know, but is driven to incriminate his own unfurled innocence. It is an uncomfortable position to be in.”(127)
In analysis of the above lines, it was initiated that Markandaya’s imaginary extent is extremely prejudiced with Multicultural activities. Civilizing dualism is her dependent situation, her individual dilemma and it is also the stable shaping spirit of her version. An encounter of two traditions is a very powerful incident. It has remote added influential outcome than atomic fission. It altered the attitude of life, the hub of our viewpoint of life.
The consequence of the encounter can be speckled. To delineate it in particular terms, it has been of three considerable kinds: acculturation, deculturation and ambivalence or transculturation. These aspects which come as an outcome of Multiculturalism can be easily identified in her work The Golden Honeycomb.
At the end, changing the present contented of the school program is not an sufficient and enough model for consequential prospectus reform in the area of race relations in schooling. A critical multicultural education system needed to look at the restriction and barriers to teacher inspiration and modernism in the institutional society of schools, in the educational prior concerns set by district offices, and especially in teacher education programs in colleges and universities.
Conclusion
The preceding argument reveals the point that true free will lies in obligation and sincerity; service and sacrifice, not in egotism and servility and enjoying noble soothes. It does not mean to mischief the alien as well as the local rulers, but to brawl against the disvalues and insufficiencies of the system that rejects an individual right to exist a evocative life. It is a united and diligent effort to free the people from exploitation, poverty, and suppression. The way the public under the name of control of Rabi gross a campaign against the domineering system exemplifies the fact that true liberty can be reached without violence and brutality.
Finally, hard work redefined the program in the name of multiculturalism must grow beyond the narrow prescription of incremental addition and substitution. A serious approach to multicultural improvement must make outstanding link between information and authority. Such an approach would fetch the whole variety of cultural and modern arrangements within schools, and between schools and societies, into hub for re-assessment with a analysis toward renovation.
