We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

Permissible Inequalities for a Just, Free and Equal Society

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Permissible Inequalities for a Just, Free and Equal Society

            I have always believed that justice, equality and freedom are three principles that are heavily linked with one another. Without equality, there can be no justice and in a society that is unjust little to no amount of freedom can be practiced, let alone attained. If a society has individuals with varying degrees of freedom, it goes to show that it is a society with inequalities. That being said, I used to believe that no form of inequality should prevail so that justice can be attained and that people will exercise the liberties that they inherently possess.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Permissible Inequalities for a Just, Free and Equal Society
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

However, after reading John Rawls’ theory on justice, I now think that certain inequalities are permissible. At the least, that is because people will hardly become equal in all fronts in real life.

            In Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Rawls writes that social and economic inequalities are permissible if such inequalities “are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity” (Rawls, p.

42). Rawls also states that the inequalities may be granted if they promote “the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society” (Rawls, p. 43). I think Rawls tries to raise the point that the prevailing inequalities in the society can hardly be reversed and that the best thing that people can do is to accept inequalities given the conditions he states. Indeed, no country in any part of the world can be overhauled overnight through very minimal efforts both on the part of the government and the people. The most that we can do is to prevent further unfair opportunities from taking shape and discriminating those who are already disadvantaged.

            I personally believe that the first condition for permitting certain social and economic inequalities is compatible with justice. For the most part, not all people have the same qualifications when applying for a job vacancy, for instance. Thus, not all people are on equal footing to begin with. Giving them equal opportunities such that none of them is barred from applying for an office position due to certain qualification inadequacies is only fitting and just. I myself would not want to be prevented by others to seek employment just because I lack certain qualifications. I should be given equal chance to apply just like others who may possess more or less qualifications than I have.

            Moreover, I also think that inequalities should only promote the benefit of the least-advantaged than those who are already enjoying certain benefits. Promoting the benefits of those who are already advantaged can only further aggravate the inequality that is already there. The reality is that there are inequalities everywhere and the poor people, for instance, should be given higher consideration when instituting government economic policies than those who are already in a better financial position. Prioritizing the social and economic needs of the least-advantaged is the most just thing to do. I think the aim of pushing the least-advantaged up the social and economic ladder is to reach a point of equilibrium or close to it so that, at the least, inequalities are prevented or are dissolved in part or in full. The closer we get to that point, the more just the society becomes and the more equal people stand. Also, people become freer than before since social and economic distinctions no longer hinder them from actively participating in social activities. Reading the work of Rawls is a mind-enriching experience because it provides a different perspective on the interrelated principles of justice, freedom and equality. While I still believe that those principles should always be upheld, I now realize that certain social and economic inequalities are permissible if they promote the benefits of the least-advantaged people in real life.

Work Cited

Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Ed. Erin Kelly. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2001.


Cite this Permissible Inequalities for a Just, Free and Equal Society

Permissible Inequalities for a Just, Free and Equal Society. (2016, Sep 06). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/permissible-inequalities-for-a-just-free-and-equal-society/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page