In ‘Here’s Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense’ , Alex Newhouse, a attorney who resides in the country of Sunnyside, Washington addresses the controversial issue of the legalisation of hemp. The exclusive intent of Newhouse’s article is to carry readers and electors that marihuanas should be legalized. Throughout his article, Newhouse focuses on the usage of ethos and Sons, while besides somewhat concentrating on the usage of poignancy, to assist carry his audience. The incorporation of such rhetoric schemes allows Newhouse to alter the sentiments of persons with positions opposing the sentiments he, himself, holds. Alex Newhouse starts out his article with a really strong statement: “No one has of all time died from merely utilizing marijuana” ( 1 ) . By opening his work with this statement, Newhouse automatically incorporates poignancy, a really powerful rhetorical schemes, into his piece.
Although it is simple, Newhouse’s statement can arouse feelings such as amazement, incredulity, felicity, and wonder. Readers may experience a mix of really different emotions from Newhouse’s statement, but the mere aggravation of even one emotional response is adequate to catch the readers’ involvement and to get down carrying them to parallel their positions with those of the writer. Towards the terminal of his article, Newhouse once more incorporates poignancy. He does so by stating, “Regulating marihuana would besides protect our children” ( 1 ) . The usage of this sentence allows Newhouse to appeal to the emotions of his audience. It is evident that the sentence is aimed towards parents.
Hence, when a parent reads such a sentence, his or her inherent aptitude to protect his or her kids goes away, therefore doing the parent feel protective, funny, and perchance even reassured and/or composure. As a consequence of reading the above sentence, many parents would automatically take Newhouse’s sentiments into great consideration, since his sentence implies that Newhouse cares about his readers’ kids. Besides, by utilizing the word “our” in that sentence, Newhouse uses ethos, entreaty to credibleness, as a rhetorical scheme. The usage of the word “our” implies that Newhouse is a parent himself and understands what it’s like to raise kids while seeking to protect them from unsafe ( for young person ) substances, such as marihuanas.
Not merely is Newhouse’s opening statement, “No 1 has of all time died from merely utilizing marijuana” an incorporation of poignancy, but it is besides an incorporation of Son, another really powerful rhetorical scheme ( 1 ) . In his statement, he implies that of the many people who have used marihuanas, non one individual has died. Newhouse’s opening statement is elusive and appears to be countless, but it is a statistic nonetheless. Throughout his article, Newhouse makes mentions to many different statistics, all mentioning to marijuana. Another manner in which Newhouse incorporates the usage of Son in his article is by doing statements such as, “According to the White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy, over 100 million Americans have tried or utilize marihuana, ” and “…the U.S. has spent about a trillion dollars and 100,000 lives on a drug war that could be reined in well with marihuanas legalization” ( 1 ) . By utilizing such statistics, Newhouse entreaties to the logic of his audience. The usage of statistics in any article or column entreaties to the audience’s logic, which benefits the writer by assisting carry his or her readers. Although Newhouse focuses on the incorporation of Son, he besides focuses on the incorporation of ethos about instantly.
In his gap paragraph, Newhouse refers to person of higher authorization, saying, “In 1872, then-President Richard Nixon appointed the Shafer Commission to analyze the nation’s lifting drug job. It reported the followers: ‘Neither the marijuana [ sic ] user nor the drug itself can be said to represent a danger to public safety” ( 1 ) . By doing a mention to Richard Nixon and the Shafer Commission, Newhouse entreaties to credibleness, since they were well-known people of power during the clip of that quotation mark. The usage of ethos, particularly in the beginning of a piece of literature, automatically lets the reader ( s ) know that the author’s credibleness can be trusted. This technique can assist open the heads of readers who are in resistance of the author’s statement. In “Here’s Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense” , Alex Newhouse presents a well-supported statement on the legalisation of marihuana.
Throughout the piece, Newhouse uses three chief rhetorical schemes to carry his readers: ethos, poignancy, and Sons. For illustration, Newhouse makes a mention to his life and a mention to beginnings that had been written by people who have/had authorization on the topic of marihuana legalisation. He besides used rather a few statistics to carry his audience. By repeatedly integrating one rhetorical scheme after another, Newhouse is able to construct a strong-standing statement to endorse up his beliefs on the legalisation of hemp. From his introductory sentence to his shutting sentence, the writer, Alex Newhouse, used a smattering of rhetorical schemes to his advantage.
Work CitedNewhouse, Alex. “Here’s Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense.” Yakima Herald-Republic. 13 Aug. 2011. Web. 30 Jan. 2012. .
Part 2: Legalization of Marijuana
Over the past few old ages, the issue of the legalisation of marihuana has become a really controversial subject. When confronted with the issue, it feels about natural to experience as though marihuana should everlastingly be illegal. However, when the issue is truly dissected and thought approximately, it becomes evident that there are more pros than there are cons for the legalisation of marihuana. Cannabis should be legalized under rigorous conditions ( refering who can utilize the substance, and how much can be used in a certain period of clip ) because it can increase overall satisfaction of life for malignant neoplastic disease patients, there are no recorded deceases caused by marijuana use, it can be taxed, it can diminish offense rates, increase province grosss, and lessening revenue enhancements. Legalizing marihuana would straight profit malignant neoplastic disease patients who undergo chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy frequently makes patients experience side effects such as hurting, loss of appetency, sickness, and purging. Many malignant neoplastic disease patients being treated with chemotherapy Begin to look ill, pale, and frail. Often times, they’re hospitalized for yearss. During those yearss, they look as though every ounce of felicity and satisfaction is being drained from their lives. All they can make is trust they’ll do it another twenty-four hours, and that tomorrow will be a better twenty-four hours. Possibly if they were allowed a little sum of marihuana, their felicity and satisfaction with their lives would increase drastically. The usage of marihuanas can alleviate chemotherapy side effects such as hurting, loss of appetency, sickness, and emesis, therefore leting a patient to populate a higher-quality life. Not merely would legalising marijuana benefit malignant neoplastic disease patients, but it would besides profit the population as a whole. There have been no reported deceases caused by the usage of marihuana. On the contrary, dronabinol, a man-made version and isomer of THC, the primary isomer and psychotropic drug in hemp, has caused a figure of deceases. If marihuanas were legalized, there would be no demand for Marinol, the prescription drug of dronabinol.
Therefore, people would non hold to worry every bit much about losing a loved one because of the usage of man-made THC. Another ground why marihuana should be legalized is that if it is legalized, it would be able to be taxed. Although taxing marihuanas would non be a marvelous economic system encouragement that would acquire the United States out of its debt, it would increase province grosss by one million millions of dollars per twelvemonth. California has already made one million millions of dollars from the partial legalisation of the drug ; research has shown that complete legalisation would gain the province one million millions of dollars more in gross per twelvemonth. Regulating and taxing marihuanas would take to a lessening in offense rates. The ordinance and taxing of marihuana would automatically diminish the figure of drug traders in the United States, since the drug traders selling marihuana would lose all of their clients to shops.
This would take to a lessening in drug-related offenses. The lessening in drug traders could besides intend less people being sent to imprison for nonviolent drug-related offenses. Since parts of peoples’ revenue enhancements go towards gaols, this could finally diminish revenue enhancements, excessively. When thought approximately merely, the legalisation of marihuana may look like a awful thought. The idea of it spurs a terrific image of a lazy, munchies-crazed society, simply lying back as the remainder of the universe moves frontward. However, when thought approximately in more deepness, it is obvious that marihuana should be legalized because it would be greatly good in many different ways, for it can increase overall satisfaction of life for malignant neoplastic disease patients, there are no recorded deceases caused by marijuana use, be taxed, lessening offense rates, increase province grosss, and lessening revenue enhancements.
