I do not doubt that Martin Luther King Jnr played a vital role in the success of the Montgomery bus boycott; however I do not think that he should be the only individual to be credited for its phenomenal achievement.Most crucially without King as a leader the Boycotters would have had no source of inspiration, they would have become disorganised with no one to assert authority, and therefore become less of a threat to the bus companies and officials meaning that their cause would not have been taken so seriously.
Also many people would have given up more easily without, the leadership that King provided, as many felt that Non-violent protest would not be recognised or rewarded.Martin Luther King was elected by the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA) to be their president. Which is important because the fact that other influential people like E. Dixon, Ralph Abanathy, and H.
Hubbard believed he was significant and could make a difference reassured black citizens and enhanced his status, giving him vital publicity for the Boycott’s cause.
Because of his doctorate in philosophy and his eloquent speech and manner, white officials and members of government authority were more likely to listen to him even though they may not sympathise. One significant point to note about King is that he was a complete contrast to the stereotype that whites had made of blacks. He was educated, well mannered and well spoken, clean looking, and most importantly non-violent in his quest for Civil Rights.
This was ironic because the excuse that most white bureaucrats, used against blacks was that they were ignorant, foul-mouthed, ruffians and vagabonds, who were aggressive and brutal.King took the main wrath of white opposition, as he was at the forefront of the campaign, making him an obvious target that would get white racist groups lots of press publicity. He received between thirty and forty hate letters every day, and his house and car were made the target of bomb attacks endangering himself and wife Corretta Scott-King.However despite all these things Martin Luther king did not begin the Boycott himself.
Indeed it was Rosa Parks, a seamstress and former secretary for the NAACP, who sparked the idea for the protest after her brave refusal to give up her seat on the Cleveland Avenue bus on the evening of 5th December 1955. Moreover it is much easier to be part of a large group campaigning for a cause with the moral support of safety in numbers, whereas it is a lot more difficult and more courageous to stand up on your own when you have no one else supporting you, because Rosa could have easily become the victim of violent abuse.As well it was a joint effort by national organisations like CORE, the NAACP and individuals like E. Nixon, Ralph Abernathy, H.
Hubbard and A. West that the Montgomery improvement Association was formed, this was not something that MLK did alone, there was much help from others.Furthermore the boycott would not have been nearly as successful if only MLK, had persevered. It was due to the huge number of black citizens who took part and campaigned tirelessly despite the difficulties and violence that they faced.
One elderly woman in Montgomery said “My feet is tired, but my soul is rested”.1 It was partly due to the fact that the bus companies in the city were losing up to 75% of their revenue that the case got to court so quickly.In addition to this it was easier for ministers like king as he was from a more privileged background than most ordinary citizens. Meaning that he could take a car or afford to pay for a cab, whose prices had been raised from only 10cents, the same as a bus ride to 45cents per passenger, after Montgomery officials passed a law making this mandatory, as they were becoming anxious by how well the boycott was succeeding.
Not only these things but King was not the only person to face violence or abuse from opposition. Reverend Robert Graetz; a white minister who served a mainly black community in his church, had his house bombed, while other members of MIA received threatening letters. On the streets the boycott had angered some white extremists, leading to blacks having eggs or other food substances thrown at them. However some whites approved of the cause and of demonstrating though non-violent protest.
Therefore I believe it is fair to say that Martin Luther King Jnr played a significant role in the Montgomery Bus boycott, but that it would not have been the astonishing success that it was without the help of other individuals and organisations and the three thousand or more black and white citizens who kept the boycott up for 381 days.1 Pg. 40 Causes and consequences of the African American Civil Rights Movement.
Cite this How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott?
How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott?. (2017, Nov 09). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/significant-martin-luther-king-jnr-success-montgomery-bus-boycott-essay/