Void and Voidable Contracts in Nepal

Table of Content

A void contract is an agreement that is not recognized by the law. A contract will be deemed void under the following circumstances as per the Contract Act, 2056 (2000), Clause No. 13:

  1. A contract that restricts anyone from engaging in any occupation, trade, public facilities, etc. that is not prohibited by the law. However, the contract shall not be considered void under certain exceptions. When a contract is among partners in a partnership firm, it may contain certain restrictions on activities that may prevent any of the partners involved in the firm from engaging in any trade or business that is similar to the partnership firm. A contract can also prevent the seller from getting into a profession or trade of buying and/or selling the goodwill of any trade. If a concluded contract among the partners prevents engaging in trade or business under the partnership firm for a certain specific time and place after separation from the partnership, then it is still a valid contract.
  2. When a contract restricts marriage, other than that prohibited by the established law.

3. A contract that prevents anyone from enjoying the facilities already being enjoyed by the general public.
4. A contract seeking to prevent the legal right of any person from being enforced by any government office or court.
5. A contract that has been concluded which is contrary to and/or restricted by existing law.
6. A contract that is concluded against public morality or public interest serving immoral purpose.
7. A contract which cannot be performed as the contracting parties are not fully aware regarding the matters concluded in the contract.
8. A contract which is considered impossible to comply with at the allocated time.
9. Vague contracts providing no reasonable meaning.
10. A contract concluded by an incompetent minor person.
11. A contract concluded with an unlawful consideration and/or objective.
Voidable Contract
A voidable contract remains valid until and unless the court decides its invalidity. One of the contracting parties must request the court to invalidate the contract and must present the necessary proof to invalidate it. The contract will be called a voidable contract and may be void under the following circumstances as per the Contract Act, 2056 (2000), Clause No. 14:
1. Coercion: A contract is concluded through coercion when one party compels the other to accept the contract.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

2. Undue Influence: A contract is concluded under undue influence when one party accepts the contract after the other party exercises influence for personal benefit. A person will be deemed submissive to his or her personal interest if they live under the guardianship, protection, and custody of another person, and if they cannot take care of themselves due to old age, sickness, or physical and/or mental weakness.

3. Fraud: A contract is concluded through fraud when one party concludes the contract after being intentionally led on by the other party with false information.

4. Misrepresentation: If a contract is concluded by misrepresenting information that misleads any parties to injustice, then it is known as a voidable contract. In other words, it is a contract that can be legally canceled or voided by the innocent party.

Contract concluded through deceit.

This sentence is grammatically correct and readable within the HTML tags.


A void contract is of no legal effect because it is not recognized by law. A void contract is not known as a ‘contract’ legally. A void contract is treated as “void ab initio” by law, meaning to be treated as invalid from the outset. It is merely a promise/agreement producing without any legal bindings. Thus, neither party can sue each other on the basis of the contract.

A voidable contract is legally binding until it is invalidated by the court in the interest of one of the contracting parties. As a voidable contract means the contract has not been concluded under free consent, the burden of proof of innocence shall rest in the party who claims that such a contract is not concluded under undue influence. In Nepal, such a voidable contract may not be avoidable if the right to avoid such a contract is not exercised within 35 days.

Legal Remedies to Void and Voidable Contracts
Following are the legal remedies for void and voidable contracts:

  1. Arbitration: It is a formal, private, and binding process where disputes are resolved by a final award made by one or more independent arbitrators. The process of arbitration is a faster, simpler, and less expensive alternative to litigation. The parties involved in a dispute must consent to arbitration, and the arbitrators to be used must be agreed upon by the parties.

2. Restitution: The basic purpose of restitution is to achieve fairness and prevent unjust enrichment of a party. Restitution is used in contractual situations where one party has conferred a benefit on another party but cannot collect payment because the contract is defective or no contract exists.

3. Rescission for judicial proceedings: Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. It can be termed as invalidating a contract between parties and is imposed mutually upon both sides of a contract. In Nepal, such a voidable contract may not be avoidable if the right to avoid such a contract is not exercised within 35 days.

4. Damage recovery/compensation: Damage recovery/compensation is the process of recovering losses. Here, actual damage (such damages which can be measured in terms of financial units according to market value) is considered. The damages can be actual damage, prescribed damage, and anticipated damage, and it should be measurable.

5. Injunction: A court order by which an individual is required to perform or is restrained from performing a particular act. It is a legal document framed according to the circumstances of the individual case. An injunction is an order for negative stipulation to relieve the aggrieved party from further damage.

6. Specific Performance: Here, compensation is not possible in monetary units. It is applicable only in the personal nature of the contract.

7. Quantum Meruits: This measure is used only in the case of an implied contract. This implies paying for the reasonable value of services for the settlement of disputes of the contract.



The grammar and readability of this text are correct within the HTML tags. It is a simple paragraph tag with the content 1.2.” which appears to be a numbered list item.

Contract Act 2056 (2000). (2000, June 17).
Mann, R. A., and Roberts, B. S. (2012). Smith and Roberson’s Business Law (15th Edition).


The grammar and readability of this text are already correct within the HTML tags.

Southwestern Cengage Learning.

Cite this page

Void and Voidable Contracts in Nepal. (2016, Jun 29). Retrieved from


Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront