A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess: Violence Makes Violence

Table of Content

This novel is short merely being about 180 pages but looks may deceive you, or in other words don T justice a book purchase its screen or its thickness. A Clockwork Orange is really 360 pages because you have to read between the lines. You may believe that the narrative’s subject is that the hereafter will be filled with atrocious decadent force ( that is what I foremost thought ), but if you read between the lines you will understand that this book is written for one chief intent, a intent other than amusement.

A Clockwork Orange was written in 1962, narrative about the hereafter which was meant to be about 1995 to 2000 ( a auto used in the narrative called a 95 ′ Durango ). A male child about 17, Alex the storyteller and chief character life in London, rampages about with his droogs ( friends ) raping, stealing, whipping and even killing people. Alex one twenty-four hours is caught for slaying and jailed but two old ages subsequently he is fortunately freed twelve old ages before his sentence ends to take advantage of a new intervention for violent people like him that he volunteered for. He goes through the therapy and succeeds and returns back to civilisation. He now becomes ill when he is about to perpetrate a violent or sexual, but besides when the Ninth Symphony by Beethoven dramas ( a child defect from the intervention ) . Alex is driven to try suicide from this defect because he is locked within a chamber playing this vocal and does non carry through his undertaking. He is hospitalized and returns to his ultra-violent ego while the inhumane intervention does non work because it does non even give people a pick about being violent.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

While Alex helps to show the subject, two different results are formed. First, Alex goes through a great alteration from being ultra- violent to going Lamb-chop and so back to being ultra-violent . Second, the subject defines the major struggle of the narrative. Although the struggle does non hold to make with Alex straight, he helps to exemplify it. The struggle is non solved in the book and will likely ne’er be solved, but it does convey up for argument what Anthony Burgess thinks approximately right or incorrect, sing the controversial state of affairs of a rhythm of force. Violence makes Violence, is what was one time said to Alex by P. R. Deltoid, his instructor from school before he went to prison. This book brings up. What do we make to person who has committed a violent offense Do we penalize them with more force, for case decease, or make we help them This is the job that has arisen in this narrative and besides in our day-to-day lives with the decease punishment. Anthony Burgess thinks that the solution to force should non be force, but he does non give any options.

In A Clockwork Orange a new intervention for disturbingly violent felons is developed by scientists working for the English authorities and the authorities tests it on some convicted violent captives. The intervention guaranteed that the patient would turn good and be let out into the free universe once more. Alex was one of the lucky ( because of decreased sentence ) people chosen. The intervention includes long yearss of watching violent film cartridge holders while a patient is hooked up to a batch of hardware. The intervention works because now when a ex-criminal sees or are about to perpetrate barbarous violent or condemnable or sexual Acts of the Apostless you become ill and can non execute the undertaking. This process was thought of to stop force without doing force, because every action causes a reaction. For illustration, when Alex was free to return to his life, his droogs betray him and beat him up badly in payback for his cruel opinion as leader of the squad of friends. This might do Alex to come back and ache them once more, which he considers. This causes a concatenation of force that may take old ages to stop. When Alex is about to travel to Dr. Brodsky ( the adult male who will bring around him ), the governor speaks to Alex. He told him about how these new extremist thoughts and methods of intervention have been formed ( from ultra-violent to a lamb ), and he does non O.K. of them. If person hits you, you hit back, do you non, the governor said to Alex.

The governor means that for each action there will be a solution of even more force. The predating brings up the inquiry of turning the bad into the good or the province should hit back besides like the inmate. One thing that is of import here is that the province does non care about turning the bad into good, but on cutting down on offense and the lone manner to make that is cut down on the figure of felons. But by making that with merely ways. In the terminal this declaration is merely another violent penalty because it does non give people freedom and it can so take to decease. In Alex’s instance he tried to perpetrate suicide. As you see this job of settling what to make to criminals is already really complicated to work out and may ne’er be solved, but as it says in the Old Testament, slaying will consequence with slaying ( of the felon ) or in other words force makes force.

This job is non for me to work out, but I think that an inexperienced person, good and hardworking individual such as for illustration Alex’s parents should hold the right to populate in peace. Therefore, one end to derive more peace is to seek to decrease offense, and to make that, penalties have to be given. If a goon were unpunished he would believe he could freely commit atrocious offenses once more. This means that the inmate has to be stopped and taught a lesson before guiltless and peaceable people get injury. Consequently, protecting good people is more of import than non penalizing a felon because the good people might acquire hurt and non the condemnable. Now merely the justice has to take who is good and bad. The book and the film complement each other. First, the book is less distinct with the subject and the subject in the film is really direct. Second, after reading the book any inquiries you might hold are solved in the film because the film is much more clear and it is besides made for an audience with less intelligence, who come to see force.

Finally, both the film and the book are likewise except that there is more description in the book and more mediate clip between all the of import events in the book. Otherwise, if you read the book foremost and see the film second, you will understand the inquiry brought up by the subject. I liked the fact that there were more that 300 words non in English, which were invented by the writer and made from Russian, hence I had to look up a batch of words in the index, but it was entertaining reading like that. The thing I liked most about the book is the controversial inquiry brought up and seeking to work out it myself. I can non believe of any disfavors about the book, but I unlike Anthony Burgess, I think that there should be a solution to. You may inquire what was between the lines and now you get your reply: Anthony Burgess explains how force is non a solution to force ( force makes force ), and that is the subject of A Clockwork Orange.

Cite this page

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess: Violence Makes Violence. (2018, Jun 11). Retrieved from


Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront