Atlantic Computer Case Study

Atlantic Computer developed a merchandise.

the “Atlantic Bundle” . to run into an emerging basic waiter market. The Atlantic Bundle is a Tronn waiter coupled with the Performance Enhancing Server Accelerator package tool “PESA” . Atlantic Computer must make up one’s mind on the pricing scheme.

Academic anxiety?
Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task
Get your paper price

124 experts online

Situational AnalysisThe external analysis is as follows:•Customers: The first client identified has a primary demand to host web sites. “Web Server” client. The 2nd client identified has a primary demand for file waiters that help layout interior decorators portion in writing. text.

and layouts. “File Sharing” client. Customers in these sections appear to be the 1s that will profit the most from the PESA tool.•Competition: The primary competition in the market is Ontario who claims 50 % of gross market portion with the balance of market comprised of many smaller sellers ( external menace.

Appendix A ) . Ontario’s concern theoretical account focuses on driving out non-value added costs and viing mostly on monetary value ( value pricing ) . Its merchandises are sold chiefly through the cyberspace.•Collaborators: The waiter division relies upon a high-touch direct gross revenues channel at a higher cost than that of on-line gross revenues.

Gross saless reps receive 70 % salary and 30 % committee. •Context: The largest section of the waiter industry is the high public presentation waiter section. The section is expected to demand about 200. 000 units next twelvemonth and is expected to turn at about 3 % yearly over the undermentioned two old ages.

The basic waiter section is a newer section with strong forecasted growing of 36 % ( external chance. Appendix A ) . The section will consist about 20 % of entire units sold following twelvemonth at 50. 000 units.

By the 3rd twelvemonth of the prognosis. the basic waiter market will do up about 30 % of entire units sold.The internal analysis is as follows:•Company state of affairs: Atlantic is a well-established company with over 30 old ages of experience in the waiter market. The company is known for supplying top-notch.

extremely dependable merchandises and high quality. antiphonal post-sales aid ( internal strength. Appendix A ) . Atlantic has focused on selling high-end public presentation waiters to big endeavor clients.

The “Atlantic Bundle” was developed to help the company in emerging into the basic waiter section. The merchandise was created to bring forth a basic waiter without making a utility merchandise to the high public presentation waiters. However. the logic seems flawed as clients would non hold viewed the basic waiter as a replacement to the high-performance waiters ( internal failing.

Appendix A ) . In the yesteryear. Atlantic’s gross revenues force gave off package tools.•Relative market/competitive place: Ontario’s Zink waiter performs at about the same degree as Atlantic’s Tronn.

Even without the constitutional PESA R ; D costs the Tronn was priced higher comparative to the Zink. Hence. the mark market was narrowed to include clients that require more than one waiter. PESA allows the Tronn to execute up to four times faster than its standard velocity.

The “Atlantic Bundle” will let companies to cut down the figure of basic waiters they must buy and cut down operating disbursals such as electricity charges and package licence fees. Mr. Matzer indicated the “Atlantic Bundle” is the sale they want.•Results: The additions to clients from the PESA package tool were examined and it was found that the Web Server and File Sharing application sections will profit the most from the tool.

The decision was based on the benefit to clients of being able to buy fewer waiters and the resulting nest eggs ( internal strength. Appendix A ) .•Challenges: The primary challenge will be to turn to whether Atlantic will be successful using its commissioned gross revenues force instead than on-line gross revenues. Another job arises in how to actuate the gross revenues force and the preparation required to sell the “Atlantic Bundle” .

Finally. package has historically been given away which appears to be the industry norm. Charging for package may estrange clients ( internal failing. Appendix A ) .

Alternate Courses of ActionFree PESA Software with Purchase. Rather than sing the PESA R ; A ; D as a sunk cost. I chose to administer the costs to every waiter. The monetary value under this path was determined to be $ 2.

122 ( see Appendix B ) . The primary drawback is that a client who would hold usually purchased the Tronn without the package would be charged a higher monetary value ( $ 2. 122 vs. $ 2.

000 ).Continuing with the tradition and norm of free package. staff would non hold to be retrained and clients will non experience anomic. Furthermore.

the one-bundle monetary value could easy be transitioned to online gross revenues. and the low monetary value will increase market portion. The “free” package could make an semblance of low perceived value. Finally.

the lower monetary value will ensue in lower net income borders. and it does non take into consideration the value advantage received by the client.Competition Based Pricing. The monetary value under this path was determined to be $ 3.

400 ( see Appendix C ) . Under this path. the company will gain more net income per package sold. Additionally.

minimum attempt is required to find the monetary value. However. the competition based pricing creates indifference between the “Atlantic Bundle” and its competition. The higher monetary value will besides cut down market portion and could stir a pricing war.

Cost-plus.The monetary value under this path was determined to be $ 2. 245 ( see Appendix D ). Atlantic would derive market portion under this path as the monetary value is low comparative to the benefits the client receives.

Additionally. the pricing will stay the same for the following three old ages. This attack does non take into consideration the value advantage received by the client. Besides.

it consequences in lower net income borders per package sold. Value-In-Use.The monetary value under this path was determined to be $ 3. 200 ( see Appendix E ) .

The primary benefit is that the attack is client focused. The monetary value is justified and the client will comprehend higher value for the monetary value. Higher borders will besides be earned. However.

Atlantic will lose market portion under this path at the higher monetary value. Additionally. staff would hold to be extensively re-trained and motivated. Customers who chiefly purchase online may be loath to sit through “We can salvage you money! ” gross revenues pitches.

RecommendationThe company should continue with the free PESA package path. The primary benefit is that the company will be able to originate online gross revenues which will cut down preparation costs. wages. and committees and will do up for the lower net income borders earned.

One primary drawback is a client will be charged a higher monetary value even if they do non necessitate the PESA tool. However. the mark market has been narrowed to include clients that require more than one waiter. because it is improbable that a client who requires merely one waiter will buy the Tronn over the Zink.

The most likely response from Ontario is to take down the monetary value of the Zink to stay competitory. At the low monetary value of $ 2. 122. Ontario would hold to take down Zink’s monetary value to less than half of the monetary value of the Tronn to contend for market portion from the mark market.

Finally. the lower monetary value provenders into the market-penetration scheme to maximise market portion. The issue of perceived low quality can be disregarded as clients have proven the low-priced scheme utilized by Ontario has non affected their sentiments on quality.DecisionThe free PESA package will let the company to vie on the same degree as Ontario through monetary value and on-line gross revenues without holding to retrain employees.

stray from the general regulation of supplying free package. or presenting gross revenues pitches to clients who will probably be loath to take portion. The low. competitory monetary value will back up market incursion and favour Atlantic should Ontario cut down its monetary values.

This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

Order custom paper Without paying upfront

Atlantic Computer Case Study. (2016, Nov 18). Retrieved from