Today we take for granted our citizenship in the United States. Equally long as we were born here. we’re a citizen. It wasn’t ever like this in the universe. Athinais and Rome both had certain systems of citizenship they followed. It wasn’t about every bit easy as it is today. A large inquiry. though. is which system was the best. I believe that both Athens and Rome had their strengths and failings in their systems. As to which I think is better. I can’t choose. The Roman Republic was more tolerant of whom they allowed to be citizens. but that’s non ever a good thing. Athens had a better manner of election. but was random. Both had good thoughts about the judgement of citizens. but in both person could take advantage of their power.
The Roman Republic was more generous in allowing citizenship than Athinais. They allowed free. native-born grownup males. every bit long as their parents were married in certain countries of the Roman Empire. They allowed free. native-born grownup females. but with limited rights. Both female and male kids were considered citizens every bit long as their parents were citizens. Besides boies of freed slaves could entree citizenship. The lone 1s that were granted citizenship in Athens were free. native-born grownup males. Rome’s system was more equal. but in the terminal could do jobs with struggles between everyone. seeking to acquire what they want.
Apart from who they allowed to be citizens. their ways of election were besides different. In Athens. they had election by lottery significance that every individual had an equal opportunity. This was fairer than Rome’s heritage of their place in the Senate. but it was wholly random. and the most ineligible individual could be chosen. In order to do of import determinations like Torahs or banishments. at that place needed to be a lower limit of six 1000. Rome merely needed three hundred to organize the senate.
Another thing was their judgement of citizens. In Athens. they would execute an banishment in which the citizens would compose the name of the individual whom in their sentiment had the most power to destruct the authorities. The individual with the most ostraka would be exiled for 10 old ages. Rome. on the other manus. would rank the citizens into different categories harmonizing on their wealth. heritage. matrimonial position. physical and moral fittingness. ECT. This determined what they got to make. how much they had to pay. and other things like that. If they didn’t run into the criterions. they weren’t given as many privileges. Both could be taken advantage of if person of higher position was intimated by another or in other similar state of affairss. All they had to make was ballot and acquire a big figure of others to seek and expatriate him in Athens or lie about the criterions person has to run into in order for them to be demoted in Rome.
As you see. both Athens and Rome had really flawed systems that could do struggle. That might even be the ground for their autumn.
