Comparison: O.J. Simpson and Tom Robinson Trials

Table of Content

“All individuals born or naturalized in the United States. and capable to the legal power thereof. are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall do or implement any jurisprudence which shall foreshorten the privileges or unsusceptibilities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any individual of life autonomy or belongings without due procedure of jurisprudence; nor deny to any individual within its legal power the equal protection of the Torahs. ” This was taken straight from the Bill of Rights ( Amendment XIV subdivision I )  and it clearly states that nil should do or implement any jurisprudence that dispossesses the unsusceptibility of the citizen on test. In the tests of Tom Robinson and Orenthal James Simpson. this amendment apparently may non hold been considered. Every adult male should be treated every bit. regardless of his race and societal position. and in these two tests that statement was non being applied.

The societal and political clime of the town in both instances was a major factor in the consequence of Robinson and Simpson’s tests. In To Kill A Mockingbird. Tom Robinson was a adult male of artlessness that was accused of colza. a offense he did non commit. Back in the 1930’s. white work forces were invariably seeking to turn out the “natural inferiority” of the African American race reprobating them as unreasonable. The jury was unable to look past race and praise the unity of Tom and typify the antonym of bias. If Tom Robinson were a white adult male. the result of the test would be wholly different.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

However. in 1994. times have shown to hold changed from the extent of racism and bias from the early 1900’s. Now. money and popularity is power despite the race of a individual. OJ Simpson was an African American who was ranked reasonably high on the societal graduated table. He was a well-known. NFL-all star with a great trade of money on his side. The jury were in favour of OJ Simpson’s artlessness from the beginning because they felt that a adult male like himself could non a offense every bit utmost as the slaying of two people. Therefore in both instances. the race and rank of the suspect detained a major place in the consequence of their tests.

In both tests. the grounds appeared to be slightly disregarded by the jury. In Tom’s test. there was no medical confirmation that he took advantage and raped Mayella Ewell. The jury could merely establish their guilty sentence of Tom on what was said by the Ewells in the courtroom. Back so. a white person’s word was automatically the truth when it was held up to the credibleness of person whom was black. At Simpson’s test. the confirmation of slaying was observed wrongfully. At the offense scene of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. blood was found in OJ ‘s auto. his socks. and a brace of his gum elastic baseball mitts. upon many other things. For some ground. the jury looked past this grounds of guilt. and that is incorrect.

Although there are many similarities present between the two tests. there are besides some differences. One difference is that there was a alteration of locale made in one instance but non the other. It was deliberated in Tom’s test but in the terminal it was determined that a alteration of locale would non be necessary due to the fact that any jury would happen a black adult male guilty in any instance. OJ ‘s instance was moved to the downtown territory alternatively of where the offense occurred to avoid racial instabilities and to suit the media clang in Los Angeles ( test was moved to Santa Monica ). This besides made it possible to alter the jury. which besides had a major consequence on the consequence of OJ ‘s test.

The concluding finding of facts of the two tests are non true. Both Tom and OJ were non treated every bit as citizens of the United States. Alternatively. they were thought of as an immorality and unreasonable black adult male and a NFL all star who would ne’er perpetrate a offense. Possibly if the jury had realized that they were handling these two people unevenly and below the belt the finding of facts of these tests would be utterly different. These tests demonstrate how race societal position. and money have an consequence on the current jurisprudence system. All people are created every bit so they shall be treated every bit in any affair

Cite this page

Comparison: O.J. Simpson and Tom Robinson Trials. (2018, Apr 04). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront