Conventional and Strategic Planning

Read Summary
Summary

Strategic planning is a necessary process for any organization to succeed, and it differs from conventional planning in that it requires an outside-in mindset, an understanding of the nature of the issue, and finding appropriate responses. Strategic planning is not limited to businesses but is also relevant to educational and religious organizations. The strategic intent is predicated on involvement of key participants and involves a more qualitative approach that allows for flexibility in adjusting the plan based on current market conditions. Skills-based strategic planning makes resources available for employees to gain necessary training and additional tools to reach maximum potential in their job productivity.

Table of Content

Strategic Planning Question A One of the major differences between conventional planning and strategic planning is that “conventional planning tends to be oriented toward looking at problems based on current understanding, or an inside-out mind set. Strategic planning requires an understanding of the nature of the issue, and then finding of an appropriate response, or an outside- in mind set” . Strategic Planning is a necessary process that must occur for any organization to thrive and prosper.

Strategic planning is not just limited to businesses, but educational and religious organizations as well. Strategic planning provides a roadmap for the organization to follow in achieving its goals. Conventional strategic plans does not account for change or learning new things. In this type of planning change becomes the enemy. This could cause problems for a business or eventually failure of a business. Strategic intent “is predicated on involvement” of key participants. “To think strategically,  hey must be active, involved, connected, committed, alert, stimulated. It is “the calculated chaos” of their work that drives their thinking, enabling them to build reflection on action as an interactive process. ” “Such thinking must not only be informed by the moving details of action, but be driven by the very presence of that action” (Mintzberg, 1994, p. 291). Strategic thinking involves a more qualitative approach as opposed to quantitative (Hamel and Prahalad, 2005).

Strategic intent allows for individuals to use their creativity and expertise to determine what is good for the organization. This allows for some flexibility in the plan to adjust for the here-and-now based on current market conditions. Skills based strategic planning makes resources available for employees to gain the necessary training and additional tools to reach maximum potential in their job productivity (Schulz and Hofer, 1999).

References

  1. Hamel, G. , & Prahalad, C. 2005, July). Strategic Intent. (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 148-161. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from Business Source Premier database. Mintzberg, H. , (1994).
  2. The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press. Rowley, D. , (1997).
  3. Strategic Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Schulz, W. C. , & Hofer, C. W. (1999). [Preface]. In Creating value through skill-based strategy & entrepreneurial strategy. London: Pergamon.

Cite this page

Conventional and Strategic Planning. (2018, Mar 01). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/conventional-and-strategic-planning-essay/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront