Get help now

Conventional versus Integrative Thinking

  • Pages 3
  • Words 588
  • Views 161
  • dovnload

    Download

    Cite

  • Pages 3
  • Words 588
  • Views 161
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Conventional versus Integrative Thinking

    Problem

                Poor interpersonal relations and conflict of interests among employees has been a longstanding problem in our company. Such are mainly caused by perceived discriminative attitude against some employees to company privileges and promotion.

    Conventional thinking

    ·         Determining Salience

    Relevant features could include race, performance, gender, and experience in the company factors and how they are reflected on in the company’s awarding of privileges and promotions to employees. Here only the question of discriminative practices at workplace is put into consideration (Martin, 2007).

    ·         Analyzing Causality

    Here the author could consider the performance of the workforce in the current situation and how such could change if the company engages to demoting and promoting other employees in favor of the employees. The aim here is to find a direct relationship between claims of discrimination and commitment of employees in promoting the goals and objectives of organization (Martin, 2007).

    ·         Envisioning the Decision Architecture

    To solve the problem, the author could seek to resolve the potential cause separately (Martin, 2007). For example, consideration of performance could be given priority over experience in awarding promotions. Due to its serious impact to company reputation, racial discrimination is next addressed. This could be followed by developing a policy of gender equality as a factor for consideration in promotion decisions.

    ·         Achieving Resolution

    Going to the employees to inquire of their grievances is instrumental at this stage (Martin, 2007). This is because it gives the thinker an opportunity to appreciate the major employee concern leading to the conflict. In this case, racial discrimination might be chosen as the best resolution over performance, thus going for affirmative action practices.

    Integrative thinking

    ·         Determining Salience

    As an integrative thinker, although the conflict at workplace is due to discriminative employment practices other potential causes should be considered (Martin, 2007). Such include; lack of an effective code of conduct, poor employee engagement practices, and a weak corporate culture in the organization.

    ·         Analyzing Causality

    Discriminative practices at workplace negate the principles of effective employee engagement practices in the organization. Conflict among employees is much more a direct result of lack of a strong positive corporate culture which promotes respect among employees. All these might be causing problems due to lack of a strong code of conduct in the organization which serves to ensure commitment of individuals or teams to their duties.

    ·         Envisioning the Decision Architecture

    Therefore, the problem causing employee conflict should be a direct result of the company’s governance structure (Martin, 2007). By encouraging equal employment opportunity without employee engagement practices, commitment of employee to work as a team remains a challenge. This is further complicated by the failure to define and enforce and effective code of conduct to dictate the behavior of individual employees and managers in conducting their duties.

    ·         Achieving Resolution

    By identifying the relationship between company structures and employee conflict, the decision will be made reflecting actual and potential causes to the problem (Martin, 2007). In such a situation reviewing of the company’s corporate culture policies remains the best resolution to the problem. The new culture should encompass equal employment policy, clearly defined employee code of conduct, and a policy on employee engagement practices.

    Conclusion

                Though both approaches might address the situation, integrative thinking gives a long-term solution (Martin, 2007) which serves to redefine the corporate culture of the organization to reflect the social, economic and psychological expectations of the workforce. This is important in promoting commitment and teamwork towards realization of the goals and objectives of the organization.

    Work cited

    Roger Martin, “How Successful Leaders Think,” Harvard Business Review. June 2007.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Conventional versus Integrative Thinking. (2016, Aug 19). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/conventional-versus-integrative-thinking/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper