The importance of keeping the criminal justice system updated with technological advancements in order to effectively combat crime cannot be overstated. It is crucial for the success of these organizations to adapt to these changes. This article will explore the use and implementation of criminal justice organizations, behavior theories, societal and organizational diversity impact, as well as the utilization of the criminal justice motivational theories matrix. The term “prevarication” refers to private entities or individuals taking on public functions that significantly impact both the criminal justice system and punishment systems. While not a new concept, it mirrors how things were done prior to the 19th century when private groups and individuals were responsible for most criminal justice functions.
According to Harvey, there is a growing dishonesty among law enforcement services, resulting in a competition between these agencies and private organizations for providing such services. It is crucial for American police to remember that their duty is to protect and serve our communities, rather than engaging in confrontations with residents (n. D.). Unfortunately, law enforcement agencies worldwide are investing significant amounts of money in obtaining military-like equipment for regular policing, mistakenly treating the neighborhoods they serve as hostile environments.
According to Ryan Grim, as mentioned in the Huffing Post, the increase in police enforcement in Ferguson, Missouri, has significant implications and has started to impact press freedom (Tim). Radar Balk, a critic from the libertarian Coat Institute, strongly opposes the expansion of police static and swat teams in the United States. While Balk believes that swat teams are appropriate for larger jurisdictions, he is hesitant about their necessity in smaller jurisdictions.
Balk adamantly opposes the improper use of SWAT teams in routine police operations, which often leads to violations of civil rights and unjust violence against innocent individuals. The presence of different viewpoints within the criminal justice system has both positive and negative effects on our communities. Regrettably, there have been cases where minority groups in our communities have experienced unethical discrimination, bias, and prejudice.
In the 21st century, multicultural societies in the United States have individuals with authority from state and federal governments, such as prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and judges, who conduct various practices. These individuals come from diverse cultural backgrounds including defendants, society members, inmates, victims, political leaders, and professionals (Barlow, 2000).
The government recognizes that cultural diversity in the United States promotes innovative thinking, policy advancements, and the creation of new ideas. It also takes into account how cultural diversity affects laws, procedures, and policies aimed at addressing both inequality and equality. Certain individuals believe that legislation protecting minority groups is directly influenced by cultural diversity, leading them to oppose these laws. While technological advancements may decrease the need for additional law enforcement officers, other factors could produce varying results.
The increase in people of color within our overall population has led to a rise in crime, necessitating law enforcement agencies to maintain their current staff levels for adequate service and protection. Despite increased accountability for their actions, law enforcement agencies must also take preemptive measures to prepare for future advancements.
